Our poll shows that the public is way ahead of Cameron in seeing the need for cuts
For the last 15 years, a four-letter word has terrified and paralysed the Conservative leadership: cuts. When it has been deployed by Gordon Brown on the electoral battlefield, the Tories have had no defence. Even after they surrendered and signed up to Labour’s spending plans, Mr Brown still accused them of planning ‘deep and painful cuts’. It is, as it happens, a charge entirely without foundation. Even now, the only people openly saying that state spending is too high are a bunch of supposed oddballs: Norman Tebbit, John Redwood — and 72 per cent of the British public.
The last group has crept up almost entirely undetected upon Westminster — which is so often the last place to realise which direction the rest of the country has taken. An old orthodoxy still reigns in SW1: that it is cruel and heartless to want cuts, and that higher state spending is the non-negotiable priority of modern, compassionate Britain. Yet outside the Westminster village, the public is growing increasingly incensed about the way ministers are spending as if the party will never end — from the expenses claimed by Jacqui Smith to cover her husband’s cinematic tastes to the NHS supercomputer.
As no party formally proposes spending cuts, the issue tends not to be raised in opinion polls — so The Spectator decided to make its own inquiries. Snapshot surveys often give a deceptive answer to such questions, as people’s minds change in the course of an election campaign as they are subjected to the case for and against. So we commissioned PoliticsHome to use its new technique: so-called deliberative polling. This involved asking a carefully balanced group of 1,406 people various questions, then asking them to consider the arguments — then asking the question again.
More articles from: Fraser Nelson | this section
Post this entry to: del.icio.us | Digg | Newsvine | NowPublic | Reddit
Advertisement
It wasn’t meant to be this way. The Tories used…
David Cameron is a sunny-side-up politician. At his first party…
The year has begun with the British political class obsessing…
Westminster used to think that 2012 would be the year…
Downing Street’s negotiating team returned from Berlin last Friday afternoon…
1,700 Unusual Christmas Presents Request Catalogue 01935 815 195 Quote SPEC10 for 10% discount www.presentfinder.co.uk
Pimilco based Florist with online ordering Web: www.olivebranch.net Tel: 020 7630 1868 Fax: 020 7233 8844
62 Shore Road, Warsash, Southampton, SO31 9FT Telephone: 01489 578867 Web site: www.ruffs.co.uk
Apollo Magazine | Corporate | Advertising | Privacy | Terms
Spectator, 22 Old Queen Street, London, SW1H 9HP
All Articles and Content Copyright ©2012 by The Spectator | All Rights Reserved
Rob Slack
April 3rd, 2009 3:21pm Report this commentWhy is it wrong to pass on debt to future generations? If the value of the assets we pass on (roads, schools, hospitals, human capital we paid for etc.) exceeds the value of the debt, we are leaving a surplus. Much of the carp about the debt burden we leave to our children is sentimental twaddle...political spin. We would better turn our minds to spending wisely; useful education, instead of Blair's tish about HE for the masses, would be a start. A ban on H&FE college courses for "nail technicians" (those people who charge £80.00 to stick guitar picks on women's fingers, fashion, snake oil healers and Chinese medicine (Middx. Uni.--5 years) would also be helpful.
johnc
April 4th, 2009 1:59am Report this commentYeah, screw the kids...
Michelle
April 4th, 2009 2:28am Report this commentThere are two types of insolvency: 1) if total liabilities are greater than assets, you're balance sheet insolvent; 2) if you can't pay off debts as they are due, you're cash flow insolvent. Even if the the nation has a net positive in assets (and would you trust the government's valuations?), she's still bankrupt if we can't pay the bills. That's the big worry.
BaiDaLong
April 4th, 2009 2:44am Report this comment'This involved asking a carefully balanced group of 1,406 people various questions, then asking them to consider the arguments — then asking the question again.'
So who says we haven't learned anything from the EU. Isn't this how they do their referenda? Take Ireland, for example. Please.
Clive
April 10th, 2009 8:08am Report this commentWhat the Conservatives fail to realise is that while cuts in Public SERVICES may be a sensitive issue, cutting WASTE in Public spending is not. There can be few outside the Political spectrum who would disagree with this and if carried out properly, the effective cuts in Public Sector spending would be hugely significant without ANY detriment to Public Services at all !
Rob Slack
April 10th, 2009 6:15pm Report this commentjonhc said
"..screw the kids".
No John; if we screw ourselves badly we shall leave a bigger mess. If we leave debt we leave it to those who must pay and those to whom it will be paid...all people who will be alive in the next generation. It is only foreign debt that is a net burden. if we waste less we should leave less of that.
John Doe
June 11th, 2009 1:33am Report this commentJohn Redwood is an oddball! He sometimes slips in and out of Welsh, without even realising it at the time!
Back to top