Oliver Letwin’s enemies thought they had seen the last of him at Blackpool. His idea of laying out a policy smorgasbord had almost sunk the party, they argued. Yes, there were some good ideas (mainly from Iain Duncan Smith) but having multi-millionaires like Zac Goldsmith proposing a Happy Planet Index and telling the shoppers not to use supermarket car parks was disastrous. Presenting contradictory policies to the public did not make the party look open-minded, it was argued, but downright schizophrenic.
Once David Cameron fought his way out by deciding hard-headed policies for himself and announcing them at the Blackpool party conference, it was assumed he had learnt his lesson and would leave Mr Letwin to terrorise Rothschilds with his talk of ‘aroma’. But those attending the policy meetings of the 1922 Committee this week, where the leadership lays out its stall to backbenchers, have found a cheery Mr Letwin turning up to introduce the sessions. He is back as policy chief, released from Tamzin Lightwater’s ‘Tranquillity Room’, helping decide which ideas the party will pick.
More articles from: Fraser Nelson | this section
Post this entry to: del.icio.us | Digg | Newsvine | NowPublic | Reddit
Advertisement
After a good meal, Tory MPs like to play a…
To step into the House of Commons nowadays is like…
When William Hague put on his masterful performance at the…
There is a reason why Tory excitement about returning to…
Mud sticks. In politics everyone remembers the charge and not…
GASCONY, SW France, near Condom-en-Armagnac 13th Century stone house, 21st Century luxury for 12 in 5 en-suites. 50 acres +
IF YOU ARE PLANNING A CHAMPAGNE RECEPTION and looking for some light entertainment, you can now hire London's busiest steel
BOSC LEBAT, SW France. Only 45 minutes from Toulouse Airport with daily flights from most provincial airports avoiding the horrors
Spectator Business | Apollo Magazine
Corporate | Advertising | Privacy | Terms
Spectator, 22 Old Queen Street, London, SW1H 9HP
All Articles and Content Copyright ©2009 by The Spectator | All Rights Reserved
Kirsty, Merseyside
November 14th, 2007 8:49pm Report this commentWould anyone really care if Dominic Grieve resigned, it would be no great loss to the shadow cabinet in my opinion. On the issue of the human rights agenda it seems to be increasingly obvious that it is not europe (as we have previously been led to believe)that is causing all these problems regarding deportations and bizarre rulings, that seem to go against national interest and common sense, but the judiciary in this country and their peverse interpretation of EU law. This seems to be becoming increasingly obvious as we see Italy doing something that would be absolutley impossibe in Britain because of the judges. I agree with the Tory policy of elected police chiefs but I think they should go a step further and have an elected judiciary as well, this would be far more radical.
Everyone Muddles 'Em Up
November 15th, 2007 8:03am Report this commentThose European Courts explained: European Court Of Human Rights: based in Strasbourg; nothing to do with the EU, it is a body of the unrelated Council Of Europe. European Court Of Justice: based in Luxembourg; the supreme court of all EU members; it serves to enforce EU law (not including the 'Human Rights Act', which is a construct of the Council Of Europe - see above) such as that covering the free movement of peoples in the EU27, which Italy is currently ignoring. International Court Of Justice: based in The Hague; a UN body.
tim duckworth
November 15th, 2007 1:23pm Report this commentAny shadow Minister - a person by definition being currently without responsibility - who threatens to resign should be displaced immediately. We do not have time for people who wish to throw their teddy out of the pram. Either achieve acceptance of ideas or leave. Threats are always the mark of the weak in such situations.
John Bull
November 15th, 2007 1:57pm Report this commentOliver Letwin & Dominic Grieve are doing us all a favour by exposing the barely concealed irrational thinking still dominating the "Conservatives". Cameron needs to decide whether he is prepared to prove he can be trusted ( not at all likely ) or get back into bed with his green labourites. If the Cameron machine cannot yet detect the crass failings of their blowing-in-the-wind policies by now, then it's high time they were all sacked and the money spent on Oxfam. What happened to the "real" 1922 Committee ?
John Corfield
November 16th, 2007 6:02pm Report this commentLove your articles,you are such a pellucid writer but when you appear on TV what language do you speak in ? I cannot understand a word you say, are you a Balt or a Slav?
Janice Small
November 17th, 2007 11:14am Report this commentNick Herbert is absolutely right and will have the backing of the majority of the grass roots membership and I believe the majority of the public. I have been holding Pro Referendum Action Days across the south east. Around 70% of the public who signed our petitions want a referendum on In or Out, not just on the Reform Treaty. The majority of our 2005 intake are believers in direct democracy or localism as it is often known as. Cameron is adopting many of their proposals and is known as the most EU sceptic leader we have had. I don't understand the argument that Grieve puts forward. What is wrong with re-negotiating our position? Were we not against Labour signing away our judicial rights in 1997? We should listen to the people.
Keith McBurney
November 18th, 2007 12:13pm Report this commentThe key is recognising that it is the people - individually and severally - who are sovereign and not parliaments where our sovereignty should be upheld and returned undeminished from the Union and EU. The state we are in is because of the State we are in - an unrepresentative dictatorship of, by and for parties not people. Along with declining membership, no party polled more than 20% of the total electorate at the last General Election in 2005. Does no to a General Election, no to the EU Constitution Treaty Referendum and no to completing PR nationally and locally sound like listening, let alone the scant real progress on long overdue constitutional reform. Party power or people power? Top down or bottom up? Toppling over or standing firm? What would get your vote?
W thompson
November 19th, 2007 4:45pm Report this commentOportunistic and shallow, it seems to me,sums up the current tory leadership.Europe is a huge unpalatable issue that continues to haunt the present and and any future leadership contenders. The Diversionary tactics currently being pursued by the current leadership will count for nought in a future general election.
John Farthing
November 20th, 2007 5:36am Report this commentI agree with the previous comment. The central issue is the EU, always has been and always will be while it erodes our ability to control our politics and politicians, and it won't go away. We need to resecure our borders and get back the primacy of our law courts as a first step. This has to go back to ECA 1972 and wholesale modification of our terms of engagement, or whether we need to be engaged at all. If the Tories have finally realised that that's a vote winner then it's time to hang out the flags and bin the UKIP dalliance - but this must be real and very plain for all to see. It's been a long time coming and if they don't do something soon I predict violence on the streets as protest goes underground. They have got to tap into that huge feeling of discontent out there and reconnect with an electorate sick to the back teeth of government by political elites who have no common sense or historical perspective. Yes old stuff, but it is central to building a new centre-right concensus. and I agree with doing things Green - but this has to come first.
Back to top