The Spectator on Joanna Lumley's campaign for Gurkha rights
The Prime Minister’s epic catalogue of early summer mishaps, mistakes and misjudgments lengthens by the day: if he is not making a fool of himself on YouTube, he is misreading the mood of the Commons on MPs’ expenses, or posing in front of swastikas. But, as wretched as they are, these incidents pale into insignificance compared to one truly monstrous strategic error: Number 10’s failure to acknowledge Joanna Lumley’s requests for a private meeting with the PM.
Part of New Labour’s political genius in its early years was to hoist a Big Tent, a welcoming canvas which stretched over everyone with influence. Sometimes, this ‘inclusiveness’ was absurd and desperate: in his first year, Tony Blair seemed ready to govern in coalition with rock stars and luvvies. But Ms Lumley does not fall into this category. She is a national treasure, symbolic of much that is good and true in British life, not only in the arts, but in her strong convictions, respect for tradition and sense of honour. Small wonder that a member of the royal family has backed Ms Lumley’s campaign against the government’s treatment of the Gurkhas.
Any PM can make a miscalculation about a Commons vote. Every politician is sooner or later caught gurning on camera. No party leader escapes speculation about a prospective challenge. But ignore Joanna Lumley? What were you thinking, Gordon?
More articles from: | this section
Post this entry to: del.icio.us | Digg | Newsvine | NowPublic | Reddit
Advertisement
It wasn’t meant to be this way. The Tories used…
David Cameron is a sunny-side-up politician. At his first party…
The year has begun with the British political class obsessing…
Westminster used to think that 2012 would be the year…
Downing Street’s negotiating team returned from Berlin last Friday afternoon…
1 Terry shouldn’t be captain, but that should be Capello’s decision to make - Rod Liddle
2 Snow? What snow? - Rod Liddle
3 JFK: The Nastiest President of the Twentieth Century? - Alex Massie
4 Do we really need to know more about Gary Speed’s death? - Rod Liddle
5 Scottish Labour Embrace the Logic of Independence - Alex Massie
1,700 Unusual Christmas Presents Request Catalogue 01935 815 195 Quote SPEC10 for 10% discount www.presentfinder.co.uk
Pimilco based Florist with online ordering Web: www.olivebranch.net Tel: 020 7630 1868 Fax: 020 7233 8844
62 Shore Road, Warsash, Southampton, SO31 9FT Telephone: 01489 578867 Web site: www.ruffs.co.uk
Apollo Magazine | Corporate | Advertising | Privacy | Terms
Spectator, 22 Old Queen Street, London, SW1H 9HP
All Articles and Content Copyright ©2012 by The Spectator | All Rights Reserved
euSSR GO HOME
May 8th, 2009 3:53am Report this commentThis 'government' is the ironclad arm of a totalitarian regime from another country. This 'government' does not have to think. This 'government' does not have to respect the citizens of this country, or its friends and allies. This 'government' certainly does not have to respect the royalty in this country.
The British People have never experienced anything like this 'government' before - and no, that wasn't the way they ran their empire.
This 'government' and the euSSR behind it should, pace Dot Wordsworth, be aware: the British People will find a way to deal with you once we've sufficiently analysed how you work. Then, you'll wonder what hit you.
Back to top