The Spectator on Gordon Brown's dishonesty over public spending
Mr Darling, the still-Chancellor, concedes that economies are on the way. ‘I have always been clear,’ he told the Financial Times on 12 June, ‘that, just as we support the economy now, in the medium term we have got to live within our means and I set out a clear commitment to halve the deficit over a five-year period.’ But the PM and Ed Balls — the man Brown wanted to supplant Darling at the Treasury — persist with the Lie Direct. Labour ‘invests’, the Tories ‘cut’. That was the message that won the 2001 and 2005 elections, they believe: why should it not bring victory again in 2010? Like the Bourbons, the Brownites have learned nothing and forgotten nothing.
It was an article of faith for the Tory modernisers when David Cameron became leader in 2005 that the party would stick to Labour spending plans — initially, at least. That pledge was a necessary part of the so-called ‘decontamination’ process: Mr Cameron’s highly successful strategy to persuade swing voters that Conservative motives are benign. But there are good reasons, post-crash, to pursue a quite different approach — as the shadow chancellor is indeed doing.
First, it is authentically Conservative. As Dr Johnson rightly said, ‘a Tory does not wish to give more real power to government’. So a Conservative administration should always have a predisposition to rein in public spending rather than to increase it.
Second, it is honest. The voters know that the country is horribly in debt, and they do not like it. That is not to say that the public is clamouring for spending cuts. But — since there must be belt-tightening — it is self-evidently preferable that the work be done by honest policy-makers rather than dishonest propagandists. The coming election will be about competence, but it will also be about character. Cameron and Osborne are right to treat the voters as adults — and Brown and Balls are wrong to think that Labour will not pay a price this time for treating us all as fools.
More articles from: | this section
Post this entry to: del.icio.us | Digg | Newsvine | NowPublic | Reddit
Advertisement
It wasn’t meant to be this way. The Tories used…
David Cameron is a sunny-side-up politician. At his first party…
The year has begun with the British political class obsessing…
Westminster used to think that 2012 would be the year…
Downing Street’s negotiating team returned from Berlin last Friday afternoon…
1,700 Unusual Christmas Presents Request Catalogue 01935 815 195 Quote SPEC10 for 10% discount www.presentfinder.co.uk
Pimilco based Florist with online ordering Web: www.olivebranch.net Tel: 020 7630 1868 Fax: 020 7233 8844
62 Shore Road, Warsash, Southampton, SO31 9FT Telephone: 01489 578867 Web site: www.ruffs.co.uk
Apollo Magazine | Corporate | Advertising | Privacy | Terms
Spectator, 22 Old Queen Street, London, SW1H 9HP
All Articles and Content Copyright ©2012 by The Spectator | All Rights Reserved
Christopher Chantrill
June 18th, 2009 6:55pm Report this commentPresumably the "Tory cuts" line will help Labour with the voters that are straying off to the BNP.
But for the Tories, the question is: what will the "precious people" think, the Lib-Dem voters they have so devotedly love-bombed for the last three years?
I'd say that if you are an enlightened, progressive sort of person, in 2009 you are ready to see an enlightened, progressive rationalization of public services. Nothing as nasty as "cuts," you understand.
Back to top