The Potemkin Chancellor might be found out now that he is Prime Minister
George Osborne may very well be next to drink from this chalice. He is mindful that oppositions do not always benefit from economic malaise (witness Neil Kinnock in 1992) and until recently David Cameron suspected the same would be true for the Conservatives. One of Mr Brown’s infuriating accomplishments was to be perceived by the public as the man one would trust in an economic downturn. The Tories could swear and spit, but in the summer the polls were unequivocal: Mr Brown’s reward for sending the economy south would be re-election so that he could fix it.
Those days are over. For the first sustained period since Black Wednesday, Labour has lost its lead over the Conservatives for economic competence — a measure which is normally key to winning an election. Yet the Tory leader’s strategy has been to match Mr Brown’s spending plans, and to offer the electorate the same ideas without Mr Brown himself. The question facing Mr Cameron this Christmas recess is whether this is wise — given that Mr Brown’s policies are manifestly failing.
Mr Osborne’s instincts remain to stress ‘stability’ rather than tax cuts (this is in order of emphasis — he has, at long last, given up pretending there is a contradiction between the two). For now, his priority is winning over the business world and persuading the City that the Northern Rock debacle would not have happened under the Tories. He is betting that events will continue to conspire against Mr Brown’s reputation as the custodian of ‘stability’, and that the Tories’ best chance is to pose as the safer bet.
Mr Osborne believes that Mr Brown’s hardy perennial line — ‘Tory cuts’ versus ‘Labour investment’ — will lose its potency this time. Yet the shadow Chancellor is not minded to amend his proposal to outspend Labour on the public services. This would, at any rate, put rocket boosters under Tory education policy — enabling the Cameroons to offer £6,000 per pupil to any body that would open up a new school in the state sector. As for defence, it is likely to have an even smaller slice of the Conservative pie than its ever-shrinking share of Mr Brown’s budgets.
All Tory roads lead towards a May 2010 election (the date which is now becoming orthodox in Westminster). Mr Cameron’s plan is to spend next year wooing business, and look at personal tax only in 2009. This underscores the safety-first approach to Tory policy (save for radical education and welfare plans, to be outlined next month). The guiding principle is to look mature and ready for government, and do nothing that would help Mr Brown portray the Tories as a risk.
For most of his time in No. 11, Mr Brown regurgitated the joke that there are two types of Chancellors: those who fail, and those who get out in time. Yet he has hardly escaped by moving next door to No. 10 Downing Street: there is no one else to blame for a Britain which today suffers the highest inflation and worst deficit in western Europe. Mr Cameron and Mr Osborne calculate that this is not their battle. That if the roof does indeed fall in on the British economy next year, it will be a personal matter between Mr Brown and the British public — and that the best thing the Tories can do is stand well back.
More articles from: Fraser Nelson | this section
Post this entry to: del.icio.us | Digg | Newsvine | NowPublic | Reddit
Advertisement
It wasn’t meant to be this way. The Tories used…
David Cameron is a sunny-side-up politician. At his first party…
The year has begun with the British political class obsessing…
Westminster used to think that 2012 would be the year…
Downing Street’s negotiating team returned from Berlin last Friday afternoon…
1,700 Unusual Christmas Presents Request Catalogue 01935 815 195 Quote SPEC10 for 10% discount www.presentfinder.co.uk
Pimilco based Florist with online ordering Web: www.olivebranch.net Tel: 020 7630 1868 Fax: 020 7233 8844
62 Shore Road, Warsash, Southampton, SO31 9FT Telephone: 01489 578867 Web site: www.ruffs.co.uk
Apollo Magazine | Corporate | Advertising | Privacy | Terms
Spectator, 22 Old Queen Street, London, SW1H 9HP
All Articles and Content Copyright ©2012 by The Spectator | All Rights Reserved
mike
December 14th, 2007 1:35am Report this commentInteresting article Mr Fraser; I notice in your penultimate paragraph you use the expression 'a May 2010 election'; indeed as you suggest there will be no General election at that time, as we have already had the last one we will be allowed in this country. The next 'election' will be to send regional representatives to the new soviet style euro-parliament. Our British Parliament and our British democracy is now finished. The betrayal is now nearly complete. What surprises me is how few people seem to realise this.
salvatore
December 14th, 2007 8:07am Report this commentYes, I agree, but will someone please ask and then continually repeat a simple question to Brown Balls Smith Cooper and Harman etc, whenever things seem to have gone wrong.
Who is accountable, and what transparent measures or targets were put in place to ensure their accountability.
The more frequently the question is asked, and evaded, the more the governments incompetence will become apparent.
Its repetition could become the drumbeat of serious political change.
Herbert Thornton
December 16th, 2007 5:14pm Report this commentA thoughtful article, but I have difficulty with the statement that the flow of immigrants has "patched over many problems".
The first 'problem' that he lists - that "without immigrants this year would be the first in recorded British history during which most children were born outside marriage" is hardly a phenomenon that can be called a problem. Without the immigrants the little bastards would at least all be British, and surely that would not be a problem, but rather the opposite?
In the same way, whatever would be wrong with London's birth rate being half what it now is? Britain is over-populated and a halving of the birth rate would be a very good thing too.
As for the absence of immigrants making Brown's record on job creation worse than Thatcher's - so what?
R Mason
December 17th, 2007 9:12pm Report this commentTax cuts are important but there is a lot that can be acheived by tax simplification. Whilst I do not expect a flat tax straight off working towards one is a very good idea. Measures could include: Increasing the personal allowance to a rate that enabled the abolition of the 10% rate. The idea being that able bodied people should get their income from work rather than benefits. Abolish NI. Give a pension for all, non-means tested but added to income for tax purposes paid for by abolishing tax relief over 22% but reducing the top rate of tax if necessary to compensate. All income, earned, savings and dividends to be taxed at the same rate. That'll do for now.
Dennis Ambler
December 18th, 2007 8:23pm Report this commentMeasures could include: Increasing the personal allowance to a rate that enabled the abolition of the 10% rate. Didn't Gordon, (sorry, Alistair), already do that?
ybin
December 28th, 2007 3:50pm Report this commentI hope this does not sound too frivolous. But Mr. Nelson, i think you are hot!!!!
Adam Hierionimous Smith
January 4th, 2008 8:26pm Report this commentHerb-you are the man!Mr Fraser's article really fails to challenge the current shibolleths in regard to the purported benefits of immigration and is much the poorer for failing to do so.
London Liberal
January 6th, 2008 7:40pm Report this commentIntriguing article Fraser.Well done,but open to the charge of articulating some obvious pounts.Did you sound any warnings about the excessive growth of credit or spiralling house prices around 2002-2005? Did any politicians sound these warnings or are we all wise after the event?.Hindsight is wonderful.
Back to top