Home > Politics > All

Monday 9 November 2009

Jobs at Telegraph

I admired Tony Blair. I knew Tony Blair. Prime Minister, you are no Tony Blair

Wednesday, 20th February 2008

Michael Gove reviews the week in politics

What marked Blair out as a genuine moderniser was that, unlike Brown, he changed his positions as the world changed around him. He changed his position on public sector reform, perhaps most crucially on education, because he saw the limitations in government of trying to improve results by simply providing more resources and ever more assertive central control, the formula by which Brown still swears.

As Blair explained in November 2006, ‘I have also learnt from experience. At first, we put a lot of faith in centrally driven improvements in performance.... But over time, I shifted from saying “It’s standards not structures” to realising that school structures could affect standards.’

And on the back of that realisation came the drive to introduce greater choice, competition and contestability in education. The preface Blair wrote to the 2005 education White Paper praised the school choice reforms of Sweden and Florida, and enraged the Labour backbenches, including Ed Balls, in the process. Ed gave an interview in the New Statesman pouring scorn on the Blair approach and asking to get back to ‘clear dividing lines’ with the Right on education. But Blair wasn’t interested in sowing division, he was determined to entrench progress.

As Anthony Seldon records in his book Blair Unbound, ‘Blair and Adonis wanted autonomous schools everywhere. Neither wanted local authorities to have any real control.’ The White Paper preface confirmed that local authorities were to play a humbler role. Blair believed that the only way education would improve is if the existing local authority structures were forced to raise their game by the presence of new, wholly autonomous providers showing them up in their locality.

But that’s a model the Brownites still reject. On their watch, the autonomy of academies has been progressively eroded in every area from the curriculum to who they can hire as builders. Far from local authorities being challenged to improve by academies, many councils have been allowed to reject them. Other local authorities have effectively neutered the capacity of new entrants to provide competition by setting up their own academies, answerable to town hall bureaucrats, not parents. It is directly contrary to the path Blair envisaged.

More articles from: Michael Gove | this section

Post this entry to:   del.icio.us | Digg | Newsvine | NowPublic | Reddit

Comments Post comment

Peter Holttum

February 21st, 2008 6:14pm Report this comment

Great - Michael Gove still thinks Mr Blair was Mr Wonderful. No wonder I have a problem voting conservative. History will show Mr Blair to have been a spin addicted disaster. To the NuLab her may have seemed like a rabid reformer, but the record shows no such achievement. Indeed he spent his career in government trying to battle against a momentum he had in fact himself created in opposition. What on earth are Conservatives to make of Michael Goves nonsense.

bill

February 21st, 2008 8:56pm Report this comment

Have to agree with the previous poster. No wonder the Tories have been out of power so long. They gave Blair a standing ovation for God's sake. I cannot find it in my heart to give them my vote.

Alexandra Taylor

February 22nd, 2008 3:05am Report this comment

All that can be said in response is, thank God for that.

"dave" cameron

February 22nd, 2008 1:01pm Report this comment

poor little oikey gove - he really doesn't get it. All that oiling up to anyone and everyone has clearly gone to what passes for his head. do us all a favour and don't publish any more drivel like this.

Ben Philips

February 22nd, 2008 1:50pm Report this comment

What planet, Michael? I'm with the others on this. Can't you see what a disingenous, vacuous, irresponsible twirp our former prime minister really is? He's as shallow as the froth on a capaccino. Yet you and Dave seem to worship the very ground he walks on. Haven't you noticed that it's been Gordon Brown controlling all aspects of domestic policy these last 10 years? That's why no progress has been made in the areas you mention?? Blair was merely the figure-head, designed to assuage the fears of middle England with his nice smile and faux sincerity. He himself must have known this all along which makes his role in the deception even more contemptible. Get it into your head, Michael - Mr Blair was not and is not 'the answer'. He's a travesty, a liar, a cheat and a coward and he's now been found out.

L Gresham

February 22nd, 2008 3:40pm Report this comment

Anyone who can actually admire Tony Blair .... sorry, I'm speechless.

David Lindsay

February 22nd, 2008 5:47pm Report this comment

As Joe Liberman was kissed on the forehead by George Bush, so Michael Gove kisses the feet of Tony Blair, who should now nominate him for Vice-President of the EU. This is the Tories' strategy: "Weren't things so much better under dear old Tony Blair?" If you don't think that things were very good at all under dear old Tony Blair, then you cannot possibly vote Tory. Gove also refers to the man he allegedly shadows as "Ed", and expresses, not just the Political Class's pathological hatred of local government generally (full of ghastly provincial people with those vulgar things called jobs), but its specific hostility to municipal involvement in education, because without that involvement there can never again be a functioning bipartite or tripartite secondary school system. So long as there are LEAs, there might once again be grammar schools instead of selection by parental income. And that would never do. Would it?

Chris Harrison

February 24th, 2008 10:31am Report this comment

It's sad, I read the comments on the Spec and NS websites - and both reveal their readers to be far less intelligent and devoid of capacity for nuance than one might hope. Autoleft balls there, autoright balls here. Pity.

Geoff Key

February 25th, 2008 10:26pm Report this comment

Reads like the fevered ranting of a delirious revolutionary. The large or small ’C/c’ is irrelevant – what we need is a touch of conservatism. There is, still, a lot worth conserving.

Mark Musoke

February 26th, 2008 5:59pm Report this comment

Gove speaks in hyperbole however I strongly agree with Chris Harrison. Wake up people, don't be so predictable! Blair was smooth, crafty and hypocritical but he was not the first and will not be the last. It was terribly offensive to sentient beings for Cameron and his acolytes to give him a standing ovation but that is what he deserved. He is a great actor, period! He was also clearly bonkers. We say that he lacked integrity but at least he had some talent. Which is significantly more than you can say for the majority of the cabinet let alone the back benches. The sooner intelligent, educated people learn to articulate themselves to the masses as well as the "intelligentsia" the quicker this country can stop the rot and turn itself around....

Madasafish

February 26th, 2008 8:03pm Report this comment

"But where Blair was explicit, and right," Like where? Name me the Blair reforms which have successfully raised standards and productivity. Simple there are none. Education? Nope. NHS? 10% decline in productivity, MRSA deaths. Welfare reform? None. Crime? Immigration? Brown is worse than Blair: he cannot fool journalists.

ian skidmore

February 27th, 2008 6:00pm Report this comment

I think a lot of us reaalised that it was standards no structures. For you to claim it as a pit stop on the road to Dmascus is laughable. But it was ever thus. Critisicsm is usually followed by canonisation. When everyone else has exhausted the subject, the friends have the platform. He ws still a prat.

Mal Tucker

March 7th, 2008 7:22pm Report this comment

This kind of grotesque fetish that Gove and his ilk have for the worst Prime Minister of the past 100 years explains exactly why they have little or no chance of returning to power at the next election. Blair was a con artist the electorate rumbled a long time ago, and only tolerated for so long because the alternative was so unappealing. It is utterly dismal for anyone who wants a proper Tory party to seize the moment that Gove's best critique of the current PM is that he loved the preposterous popinjay who 'acted' as our leader for (can you believe it?) a whole decade.

Jason Dack

March 7th, 2008 10:39pm Report this comment

Michael Gove is like a rather camp schoolboy trying to impress one of the older boys - in this case, Blair. Gove, of course, is madly in love with the former PM. He has also reminded me why I won't be voting Conservative at the next election.

Post comment

Back to top

In this section

7 November 2009

To step into the House of Commons nowadays is like…

31 October 2009

When William Hague put on his masterful performance at the…

24 October 2009

There is a reason why Tory excitement about returning to…

17 October 2009

Mud sticks. In politics everyone remembers the charge and not…

10 October 2009

It was as if the banks were taunting the Conservatives…

sponsored links

Spectator recommends

Spectator classifieds

      GASCONY

GASCONY, SW France, near Condom-en-Armagnac 13th Century stone house, 21st Century luxury for 12 in 5 en-suites. 50 acres +

BIG SAND STEEL BAND

IF YOU ARE PLANNING A CHAMPAGNE RECEPTION and looking for some light entertainment, you can now hire London's busiest steel

BOSC LEBAT, Tarn et Garonne.

BOSC LEBAT, SW France. Only 45 minutes from Toulouse Airport with daily flights from most provincial airports avoiding the horrors