Michael Gove reviews the week in politics
It’s not just on education, however, that Brown’s approach is a rejection of Blair’s own pattern of modernisation. In the fight against extremism, Blair also evolved a stronger position over time. The events of 9/11 and 7/7 prompted Blair to examine the Islamist ideology behind the terror threat. In March 2006 Blair was explicit in locating the threat we faced in ‘an ideology exported around the world’ which could be traced to ‘offshoots of the Muslim Brotherhood, supported by Wahabi extremists’.
But where Blair was explicit, and right, Brown has been opaque and weak. He has deliberately avoided making any reference to the ideological roots of the threat we face. Only a couple of weeks ago the Guardian reported how Brown had effectively censored his own government in this struggle, banning ministers from identifying the specific dangers in Islamism.
These retreats that Brown has authorised — in education and the fight against extremism — are not marginal adjustments. They are reversals on two of the central issues which defined Blairism, particularly in its high modernising phase after 2001.
Alongside these retreats must be counted the failure to press ahead properly with more diverse provision in the NHS, as Blair’s own reform guru Professor Julian Le Grand has lamented, and the junking of plans to devolve real power over policing to local communities.
What Blair came to recognise, and what Brown still rejects, is that reform requires a constant application of pressure to the accelerator. The sheer power of inertia, the accumulated strength of special interests, the resistance from producer forces and trade union voices, all mean that to coast or slow down on reform is to lose the momentum necessary to effect change. Under Blair, opponents of reform came to know his velocity. Under Brown, they know they won’t be challenged by the Man Who Came to Dither.
More articles from: Michael Gove | this section
Post this entry to: del.icio.us | Digg | Newsvine | NowPublic | Reddit
Advertisement
After a good meal, Tory MPs like to play a…
To step into the House of Commons nowadays is like…
When William Hague put on his masterful performance at the…
There is a reason why Tory excitement about returning to…
Mud sticks. In politics everyone remembers the charge and not…
GASCONY, SW France, near Condom-en-Armagnac 13th Century stone house, 21st Century luxury for 12 in 5 en-suites. 50 acres +
IF YOU ARE PLANNING A CHAMPAGNE RECEPTION and looking for some light entertainment, you can now hire London's busiest steel
BOSC LEBAT, SW France. Only 45 minutes from Toulouse Airport with daily flights from most provincial airports avoiding the horrors
Spectator Business | Apollo Magazine
Corporate | Advertising | Privacy | Terms
Spectator, 22 Old Queen Street, London, SW1H 9HP
All Articles and Content Copyright ©2009 by The Spectator | All Rights Reserved
Peter Holttum
February 21st, 2008 6:14pm Report this commentGreat - Michael Gove still thinks Mr Blair was Mr Wonderful. No wonder I have a problem voting conservative. History will show Mr Blair to have been a spin addicted disaster. To the NuLab her may have seemed like a rabid reformer, but the record shows no such achievement. Indeed he spent his career in government trying to battle against a momentum he had in fact himself created in opposition. What on earth are Conservatives to make of Michael Goves nonsense.
bill
February 21st, 2008 8:56pm Report this commentHave to agree with the previous poster. No wonder the Tories have been out of power so long. They gave Blair a standing ovation for God's sake. I cannot find it in my heart to give them my vote.
Alexandra Taylor
February 22nd, 2008 3:05am Report this commentAll that can be said in response is, thank God for that.
"dave" cameron
February 22nd, 2008 1:01pm Report this commentpoor little oikey gove - he really doesn't get it. All that oiling up to anyone and everyone has clearly gone to what passes for his head. do us all a favour and don't publish any more drivel like this.
Ben Philips
February 22nd, 2008 1:50pm Report this commentWhat planet, Michael? I'm with the others on this. Can't you see what a disingenous, vacuous, irresponsible twirp our former prime minister really is? He's as shallow as the froth on a capaccino. Yet you and Dave seem to worship the very ground he walks on. Haven't you noticed that it's been Gordon Brown controlling all aspects of domestic policy these last 10 years? That's why no progress has been made in the areas you mention?? Blair was merely the figure-head, designed to assuage the fears of middle England with his nice smile and faux sincerity. He himself must have known this all along which makes his role in the deception even more contemptible. Get it into your head, Michael - Mr Blair was not and is not 'the answer'. He's a travesty, a liar, a cheat and a coward and he's now been found out.
L Gresham
February 22nd, 2008 3:40pm Report this commentAnyone who can actually admire Tony Blair .... sorry, I'm speechless.
David Lindsay
February 22nd, 2008 5:47pm Report this commentAs Joe Liberman was kissed on the forehead by George Bush, so Michael Gove kisses the feet of Tony Blair, who should now nominate him for Vice-President of the EU. This is the Tories' strategy: "Weren't things so much better under dear old Tony Blair?" If you don't think that things were very good at all under dear old Tony Blair, then you cannot possibly vote Tory. Gove also refers to the man he allegedly shadows as "Ed", and expresses, not just the Political Class's pathological hatred of local government generally (full of ghastly provincial people with those vulgar things called jobs), but its specific hostility to municipal involvement in education, because without that involvement there can never again be a functioning bipartite or tripartite secondary school system. So long as there are LEAs, there might once again be grammar schools instead of selection by parental income. And that would never do. Would it?
Chris Harrison
February 24th, 2008 10:31am Report this commentIt's sad, I read the comments on the Spec and NS websites - and both reveal their readers to be far less intelligent and devoid of capacity for nuance than one might hope. Autoleft balls there, autoright balls here. Pity.
Geoff Key
February 25th, 2008 10:26pm Report this commentReads like the fevered ranting of a delirious revolutionary. The large or small ’C/c’ is irrelevant – what we need is a touch of conservatism. There is, still, a lot worth conserving.
Mark Musoke
February 26th, 2008 5:59pm Report this commentGove speaks in hyperbole however I strongly agree with Chris Harrison. Wake up people, don't be so predictable! Blair was smooth, crafty and hypocritical but he was not the first and will not be the last. It was terribly offensive to sentient beings for Cameron and his acolytes to give him a standing ovation but that is what he deserved. He is a great actor, period! He was also clearly bonkers. We say that he lacked integrity but at least he had some talent. Which is significantly more than you can say for the majority of the cabinet let alone the back benches. The sooner intelligent, educated people learn to articulate themselves to the masses as well as the "intelligentsia" the quicker this country can stop the rot and turn itself around....
Madasafish
February 26th, 2008 8:03pm Report this comment"But where Blair was explicit, and right," Like where? Name me the Blair reforms which have successfully raised standards and productivity. Simple there are none. Education? Nope. NHS? 10% decline in productivity, MRSA deaths. Welfare reform? None. Crime? Immigration? Brown is worse than Blair: he cannot fool journalists.
ian skidmore
February 27th, 2008 6:00pm Report this commentI think a lot of us reaalised that it was standards no structures. For you to claim it as a pit stop on the road to Dmascus is laughable. But it was ever thus. Critisicsm is usually followed by canonisation. When everyone else has exhausted the subject, the friends have the platform. He ws still a prat.
Mal Tucker
March 7th, 2008 7:22pm Report this commentThis kind of grotesque fetish that Gove and his ilk have for the worst Prime Minister of the past 100 years explains exactly why they have little or no chance of returning to power at the next election. Blair was a con artist the electorate rumbled a long time ago, and only tolerated for so long because the alternative was so unappealing. It is utterly dismal for anyone who wants a proper Tory party to seize the moment that Gove's best critique of the current PM is that he loved the preposterous popinjay who 'acted' as our leader for (can you believe it?) a whole decade.
Jason Dack
March 7th, 2008 10:39pm Report this commentMichael Gove is like a rather camp schoolboy trying to impress one of the older boys - in this case, Blair. Gove, of course, is madly in love with the former PM. He has also reminded me why I won't be voting Conservative at the next election.
Back to top