Spectator readers respond to recent articles
The Afghan toll
Sir: Jonathan Foreman’s article (‘Britain’s forgotten casualties’, 22 August) highlights how the focus on the death toll in Afghanistan eclipses a much wider human and economic cost arising from those many seriously injured soldiers who will require help for the rest of their lives. If you include those who are subsequently affected, often long after their service, by mental health problems arising from what they have endured, the human and economic costs are even greater.
However, while it is clear that the government needs to ensure that it responds effectively to this legacy arising from the Iraq and Afghanistan conflicts, it should not be assumed that those soldiers are abandoned at the point where state provision ends.
In addition to the great work done by Help for Heroes and the other military charities, the regiments and corps of the army play an active role in supporting individual soldiers and their dependents who need help. Indeed many who work in this area would argue that some functions are more efficiently carried out by the charity sector and by those who know the individuals and their circumstances better.
As a former Welsh Guards officer who closely follows the fortunes of my regiment as they serve with such distinction in Afghanistan, I know that the regiment treats each and every soldier as a member of a close family, and therefore takes its responsibilities to serving or former Welsh Guardsmen and their dependents very seriously. Like many other regiments, we are planning ahead to ensure that we can do everything possible to care for those affected directly or indirectly by current operations. In the long term this will require considerable funds, so we have founded the Welsh Guards Afghanistan Appeal (see www.welshguardsappeal.com) due to launch on 7 September, in order to bear our responsibilities effectively. All contributions will be very gratefully received.
Harry Wynne-Williams
London SW12
More articles from: | this section
Post this entry to: del.icio.us | Digg | Newsvine | NowPublic | Reddit
Advertisement
When David Cameron and George Osborne move between their suite…
It is not often that David Cameron lavishes praise on…
There is something wonderfully self-perpetuating about mutiny in politics. Any…
Prediction is very difficult, especially about the future‚ as the…
David Cameron is only taking a week off this Christmas.…
1 The phosphorus cloud over Ha'aretz - Melanie Phillips
2 Another blow for the climate change lobby: Prince Charles
3 By the waters of denial they sit and weep... - Melanie Phillips
4 Amnesty International, Moazzam Begg and the Bravery of Gita Sahgal - Martin Bright
5 American tea-party dishes hopey-changey thing - Melanie Phillips
1 Another blow for the climate change lobby: Prince Charles (61)
2 American tea-party dishes hopey-changey thing - Melanie Phillips (41)
3 Why give money to charity when they shaft what they purport to defend? - Rod Liddle (35)
4 Dying for new roads? - Melanie Phillips (22)
5 More news from the un-level playing field - Susan Hill (20)
WELCOME TO LOVE GENERATIONS Online dating for the over 50s An online dating site for single men and women in
GASCONY, SW France, near Condom-en-Armagnac 13th Century stone house, 21st Century luxury for 12 in 5 en-suites. 50 acres +
BOSC LEBAT, SW France. Only 45 minutes from Toulouse Airport with daily flights from most provincial airports avoiding the horrors
Spectator Business | Apollo Magazine
Corporate | Advertising | Privacy | Terms
Spectator, 22 Old Queen Street, London, SW1H 9HP
All Articles and Content Copyright ©2010 by The Spectator | All Rights Reserved
David Keen
August 30th, 2009 8:01pm Report this commentSad to see Taki forgetting his remit is High Life; he is back on his subtle anti-Jewish theme, namimg Sugar, Green, Abramovich and Madoff exclusively. This is no coincidence. Much of his previous writings follow this theme. Nowhere is High Life relevant to its title. Perhaps it is time to retire the ancient Greek. (I am not even part-Jewish, but recognise this type of bias.Among others. Editorial checks seem non-existent as regards this foolish old contributor)
Back to top