The Will of the People does not exist. It is the abominable snowman of politics

22 May 2010

Matthew Parris offers Another Voice

I shall now attempt something in which I fully expect to fail. My pessimism is not unfounded. I’ve been trying to put across this case for 30 years, without ever seeing in my hearers’ eyes that glint of recognition that signals the successful communication of an idea.

Failure to convey an argument that I’m sure is important and right has been frustrating. But this is the fate of advocates of theories that challenge the very terms of a debate. The same difficulty is encountered by advocates for atheism; may well be encountered if the Hadron Collider in Geneva fails to verify the existence of the Higgs-Boson sub-atomic particle; and was among the reasons the miasma theory of the transmission of diseases lingered so stubbornly in the face of counterfactual evidence.

Advocacy struggles when central to its logic is the submission that something we take for granted, and around which a great web of related reasoning has been built, simply doesn’t exist. Even if forced to accept that the missing entity has not been usefully described, let alone proved, people will resist the conclusion that it doesn’t exist, preferring to protest that, though we all suspect it’s there, and though it surely must be there if there’s a perfectly good English word for it, it’s proving difficult to tie down.

And so to the current argument about changes (or ‘reforms’) to Britain’s voting system. My submission is this: that the Will Of The People (WOTP) does not exist. There is no such thing. The WOTP is a fiction, a mirage, a conceptual void, a construction as fanciful as the creation of ploughs, scorpions and huntsmen out of the random dots of stars in the night sky. Once we accept that there is no such animal as the WOTP, the secondary debate about how most accurately to represent it simply falls away; and we become able to ask more practical questions about the right relationship between the many and often conflicting wishes and opinions of many people, and the structures of their governance.

1 | 2 | 3 | 4 Next page

More articles from: Matthew Parris | this section

Print this article | Email to a friend | Permalink | Comments (2)

Post this entry to: del.icio.us | Digg | Newsvine | NowPublic | Reddit

Post comment

Tim Hedges

May 24th, 2010 3:52pm Report this comment

I think one thing can be said: that the policies of a prospective government should be on show before we vote. On the continent (PR) there are lots of little parties and after the vote they get together, rather like what we have now.

Usually in Britain it is the parties that are the coalition, esch having a left & right, authoritarian & libertarian. At least, though, we get to see the nature and policies of the coalition before we vote.

Whatever the WOTP may or may not be, the will of the political class is something different.

TGF UKIP

May 25th, 2010 5:50pm Report this comment

Wouldn't matter if WOTP did have an existence capable of voice, the London village establishment, of which Matthew Parris is very much part, would simply ignore it. If it ain't green, politically correct and social democrat it would be simply dismissed as the ignorant ravings of the provincial little people.

We really do need a new non-London political party.

Post comment