The Afghan ‘mineral strike’ is just spin

19 June 2010

John C. Hulsman and Jaakko Kooroshy explain that what looks like good news in Afghanistan is in fact just part of a propaganda war between Obama and Petraeus

This week, just as things were looking at their bleakest in Afghanistan — growing casualties and the damning report on the links between Taleban leaders and the Pakistani secret service — the Pentagon pulled a rare piece of good news out of the hat: Afghanistan, it turns out, is not only a poppy-growing paradise but also a mining El Dorado. Around $1 trillion worth of minerals has been discovered (says the US Geological Survey) and according to enthusiastic US and Afghan officials, this stunning potential could make mining the future backbone of the Afghan economy.

Well, hooray, then let’s not pull out so hastily, people have begun to say. Perhaps all those lives weren’t wasted; perhaps with the help of this newfound wealth, Kabul can secure democracy and keep the Taleban at bay.

But before we all get too excited, we should ask: is this really such an exciting discovery? Upon closer inspection, in fact, it tells us far more about the politically exhausted state of the American home front than it does about Afghanistan. It’s less a discovery than a desperate tactic: the hawks’ last roll of the dice in their bid to stop Obama pulling out.

Although much of the media on both sides of the Atlantic has taken the hawks’ bait, a little scrutiny shows there’s far less to the mineral strike than meets the eye. The US Department of Defense briefing claims that $908 billion worth of reserves of copper, iron, cobalt, gold and lithium (used to make cellphone batteries) are lying in the ground in Afghanistan, as if they’re just waiting to be exploited. But that’s not how it works. Mining is a difficult business, requiring four key conditions to succeed. Afghanistan, which has no mining tradition, fails on all four counts.

1 | 2 | 3 | 4 Next page

More articles from: John C. Hulsman and Jaakko Kooroshy | this section

Print this article | Email to a friend | Permalink | Comments (1)

Post this entry to: del.icio.us | Digg | Newsvine | NowPublic | Reddit

Post comment

David Bouvier

June 17th, 2010 10:07am Report this comment

I think the sub-editor should have put on the headline "West insufficiently totalitarian and brutal to development Afghan mining; Chinese involvement seems likely. Liberty and democracy unlikely to benefit.""

Post comment