He’s saying that Boris is someone who, through charm, is capable of getting people to do lots of work for him for little obvious reward.
How is this a bad thing for the ratepayers of London?
A good thing
Yesterday's Telegraph contained an astonishing ad hominem attack by Simon Heffer on Boris Johnson. This is perhaps the least of it:
In his superb biography of him, my colleague Andrew Gimson outlines the practice that has allowed Mr Johnson to get so far in life: he has used his charm, to which only a few more seasoned hands are immune, to enlist at every stage what Mr Gimson calls "stooges" to help him advance.But there's a wonderful comment left on Tim Worstall's site:There were stooges when Mr Johnson was en route to be president of the Oxford Union. He has had stooges all through journalism, who did significant parts of his various jobs for him, usually with little thanks or reward. And now there are stooges in politics.
Let me get this straight…