Who would you like to see succeed Gordon Brown as leader of the Labour Party? Still deluded by the continuation of power and the hopeless yearning that it all might come right next summer, Labour has been strangely united at its conference. Certainly compared to those conferences I well remember in 1979, 1983 and even 1987. The issue scarcely arose. I realize that asking many of you who you would prefer to lead the party, Mandelson, Straw or Harman is akin to asking you to choose between smallpox, diphtheria and bilharzia. But hell, have a heart, indulge me for a few moments. And remember that while Cameron and his ideologically ectoplasmic public school monkeys will win next year, they may not have very long to exercise whatever vague authority it is they possess. Probably about as long as each of them had in the Bullingdon Club, minus the coke. (I mean the soft drink, obviously).
I would be happiest with Jon Cruddas – I think I might even rejoin the party - but it would have to be a fabulous rout for him to succeed. The election of Harperson might ensure that the party does what Anatole Kaletsky suggests it might and sort of evaporates overnight; so for those confirmed Conservatives among you, she might be your choice. I have to confess that try though I might I have not yet come to love Peter Mandelson, although clearly he thinks we lefties all love him now as representing the only possible deliverance from eviction at the polls. You think Brown alienates the voters? Wait until the sinuous, serpentine Mandelson starts smirking from behind a microphone. Straw I would take, because he seems to me likeable enough and with sufficient connection to Old Labour to realise that, from time to time, the party should make the occasional nod in the direction of the working class. I also suspect he was not quite so gung-ho for the Iraq war as most of the rest, but I may be deluding myself in this. Clarke and Milburn are still prowling around, outside the tent; both, at least, are clever people (compared to Harman, I mean). I think I would be happy-ish with Clarke. And then there’s the postie. None, apart from Cruddas and maybe Straw, fill me with enormous enthusiasm.
Blogs: Martin Bright | Susan Hill | Alex Massie | Melanie Phillips | Coffee House | Faith Based
Actions: Print this article | Email to a friend | Permalink | Comments (28)
Post this entry to: del.icio.us | Digg | Newsvine | NowPublic | Reddit
Advertisement
1 Yes campaign launch will cause problems — for the independence movement - Ysenda Maxtone Graham
2 Obama vs Balls - edited by Graham Storey, Margaret Brown and Kathle
3 Cameron's attack on Balls is strangely endearing - Lloyd Evans
4 Susie Squire to take over as Tory press chief - James Forsyth
5 What Farage's offer means for David Cameron - James Forsyth
1,700 Unusual Christmas Presents Request Catalogue 01935 815 195 Quote SPEC10 for 10% discount www.presentfinder.co.uk
Pimilco based Florist with online ordering Web: www.olivebranch.net Tel: 020 7630 1868 Fax: 020 7233 8844
62 Shore Road, Warsash, Southampton, SO31 9FT Telephone: 01489 578867 Web site: www.ruffs.co.uk
Apollo Magazine | Corporate | Advertising | Privacy | Terms
Spectator, 22 Old Queen Street, London, SW1H 9HP
All Articles and Content Copyright ©2012 by The Spectator | All Rights Reserved
Lupus Lungfish
September 30th, 2009 3:00pmHow about Arthur Scargill?
Lupus Lungfish
September 30th, 2009 3:23pmEverything that has a beginning has an ending. Make your peace with that and all will be well
Gwydir
September 30th, 2009 3:26pm"...only Cruddas fills me with enthusiasm."
My dear chap, you left out the part where you explain why. Would you, please? Or else what exactly was the point of this non-post?
Bunnykins
September 30th, 2009 3:58pmIs that chap in the pic Fred Pike? He'd make quite a good choice.
Hawkeye
September 30th, 2009 4:15pmI would much prefer it if Gordon Brown was the last ever leader of the Labour party.
If there had to be another Labour leader then I would choose Hattie to ensure that Labour stayed unelectable.
Sorry Rod - I don't want them back in. Ever.
Having said that, it is obvious that at some point in the future the tories will become tired and need time to reconsider their positions and policies so some form of opposition is necessary. One party states are good for no one.
The Labour party in its current form is simply too incompetent and dangerous to re-elect.
Hawkeye
September 30th, 2009 4:27pmO/T
Actually, a question springs to mind - one for Rod given his previous job as an editor on the Today programme.
Having watched Gordon's inglorious interviews and the attacks on the media earlier today, what is the journalists perspective from here on in? How will the news rooms react? If you where still in the R4 newsroom and Gordon had treated a Today presenter like he treated Adam Boulton, what would be the tone of subsequent interviews?
Would stories be slanted more against Labour than otherwise?
GaryO
September 30th, 2009 4:28pmGet ready for the "Toffs Parade" that will be the Tory government - scolding and berating us for at least the next four years.
How about Andy Burnham though? The man seems to know his business and is articulate, presentable and middle of the road. However, this is purely academic, as I will not be voting at the next general election. Name me a party that promises to keep Turkey out of EU, gives us a referendum on the Lisbon Treaty; curtails, nay stops, further immigration until we reach near full employment (yes, I know the business about matching skills and jobs, but still, you know what I mean) and promises to close all faith schools and I will vote for them with my eyes closed.
Fergus Pickering
September 30th, 2009 5:22pmWe lefties! Considering your views on immigrant muslims, with which I heartily concur, on feminism, on, hell on almost anything, I doubt if the Labour Party would accept you naked on a platter with a punch of Rosemary in your mouth. Hell, Rod, get real. You haven't been a leftuie since God knows when. You are, like me, a philosophical anarchist wedded to the stirring up of confusion and mayhem among the chattering classes. And go to it! Cruddas? Who's Cruddas.
startledcod
September 30th, 2009 5:47pmHe doesn’t appear in any polls, he isn’t even in the running but maybe, just maybe, Alistair Darling is the man to replace GB. He’s calm, he’s sensible, he’s realistic, he appears honest. We know that he has been way ahead of GB in being (a little bit) honest about the s**t.
Cometh the hour, cometh the man.
Alistair Darling for PM.
In2minds
September 30th, 2009 6:00pmNulabour nu leader? People laughed when Ed Balls gave us - Post neoclassical endogenous growth theory
Well the title Cuddas's Ph.D is -
An analysis of value theory, the sphere of production and contemporary approaches to the re-organisation of workplace relations
Funny or what?
James Delingpole
September 30th, 2009 7:00pmRod, I find your comments regarding bilharzia highly offensive. I myself have suffered from bilharzia - or schistosomiasis, as we hypochondriacs also lovingly call it - and though it can indeed involve unpleasant symptoms like bleeding in the urine, lethargy, pain and general internal rotting, plus a diagnostic test which involves having a metal, willy-like object shoved up your bottom to take a tissue sample via "rectal snip", I can assure it isn't half as unpleasant as any of the contenders for the Labour leadership.
John RH
September 30th, 2009 7:30pmRod - I'm bemused. I love a maverick - and since Bron's untimely demise you have helped fill the gap. Yet your views are decidedly rightish/ libertarian/ small state. You do not fit easily into the "bossy" "from above", "Statist", "Vote For me And I'll Spend Your Money" Labour Party. Perhaps one day you will explain to those ex Comrades why it is you still see yourself as a lefty. I understand your dismay at Cameron et al - but at least they seem to be firing on more than one cylinder and have substantially more intellectual BHP than the equivalent 1 cylinder, side valve, with a cracked block, and severly high maintenance inefficient, Labour party. I like your blog by the way.
Simon Denis
September 30th, 2009 8:45pmJust to second John RH's point, come off it - you're no more left wing than Nigel Lawson - and all the better for that. The one lonely strand of leftery to which you seem to cling is an opposition to that picturesque form of pest control known as fox hunting, a cause in which Anne Widdecomb - hardly Rosa Luxemburg - would join you. In your Sunday Times evisceration of Batty Hatty Selfharm's equality agenda, you gave an impeccably classical liberal analysis of the so-called "pay gap". For ages, you've been suggesting that mass immigration keeps wages unpalatably low. Are you seriously suggesting that Cruddas or Burnham would sympathise with this very fair point? Would they hell! At most, you strike me as an old Dickensian radical - a noisy, impudent, ingenious, free booting, hedonist with a sentimental streak and a suspicion of flummery. In my book, for what it's worth, that makes you a sort of Liberal on the right. Why not admit it?
Simon Stephenson
September 30th, 2009 8:48pmWell I think it's important that we have a functioning party of the left, because politics is about choice, about allocation of scarce resources, and society benefits from the full consideration of the arguments of talented people from all parts of the political spectrum.
That having been said, what I think is also important is that political debate is conducted with scrupulous intellectual honesty, so that acceptable rhetoric and hyperbole are clearly distinguished from unacceptable misrepresentation and deceit.
So for the next Labour leader, I would be looking for someone within the ranks who also believes that intellectual honesty is paramount. And in a party whose maxim seems to have been "Never tell the truth, because a lie is always better" it's quite difficult to find someone who fits the bill. In fact, no one springs to mind at all.
Thomas Cussans
September 30th, 2009 10:18pmRod!
They are all, without exception, cretinous, clod-like and loathesome.
There is nothing more to be said.
rod seacole liddle
September 30th, 2009 11:33pmHave to say I have thoroughly enjoyed these responses, especially from my friend James and Mr Cussans.
"About as left wing as Nigel Lawson" - terrific.
simon s
September 30th, 2009 11:44pmCrappas has a nice flat in the 'Golden Crescent' which we've paid for. And his son attends a posh Catholic 'grammar school by other means' in the Crescent. Even though he believes that schools in Daghenham should support 'working class values'. Crapass is a smug joker.
Gauloise Smoker
October 1st, 2009 4:05amLupus - I was going to say the same thing - surely Arthur Scargill/Cruddas would be a dream ticket.
Good old trendy Rod. Let me entertain you whilst we take the non partisan social road.
Hell, I listen to the Rolling Stones and drink beer and wear a bit of eyeliner and worrying about how to bring the proles up to my level is a mark of my caring, common sense outlook.
Come on people, Love me!! Be like me!! It's much easier and people like you as you are always nice and sociable.
Paul.
October 1st, 2009 8:39amGaryO- Perhaps move to Buckingham?
Lupus
October 1st, 2009 10:04amGauloise Smoker- Sounds like you've had a long night loafing around the bars of the Quartier Pigalle!
rod seacole-liddle
October 1st, 2009 10:08amGauloise - aside from the gauloise, are you on some form of medication?
Ed P
October 1st, 2009 2:01pmConsider Ed Milliband (obviously not "banana" David)
Maggie
October 1st, 2009 2:34pmSince you recommended him I've been paying close attention to the lacklustre performances of Jon Cruddas. As far as I can see he's a charisma-free zone but his pedestrian views and leaden delivery might appeal if you find Gordon Brown too exhilaratingly whizzy.
workie ticket
October 1st, 2009 2:57pmHarman is right. She should lead labour into the next election accompanied with quality acts like Estelle morris and Margaret Becket (is Margaret Hodge still alive?). They would be such a match for Cameron and Osbourne those doughty, principled men of steel. What a battle that would be and what a great feeling to know that, whoever won, the country would be in such great hands.
daniel maris
October 1st, 2009 10:51pmStraw? You mean the bloke who let the Iranians get started on their nuclear bomb project while he engaged in fruitless mock "negotiations" with the wily Persians? Hardly leadership stuff.
Cruddas is a soundbite merchant. Hasn't got an idea in his head.
Harman's head is full of nonsense, dangerous nonsense.
Charles Clarke I think is about the only one I would run with. Mandelson is a very smooth operator.
My problem with Labour overall is that they have built a constituency based on mass immigration and welfare dependency - two trends which have the potential to damage or even destroy our society.
Iceman
October 2nd, 2009 5:52pmI reckon Labour ought to go for Ken Dodd. The country would remain in the mess they got us into, but we would laugh alot.
Peter Arctic
October 3rd, 2009 12:19amI agree. At least Cruddas seems to stand for something vaguely left of centre.
But it won't really matter. The Tories are nailed on for at least two terms, probably three, maybe four.
Liddle blog historian.
December 10th, 2009 7:57pmClassic thread this one!