During the feisty game between Swindon and Millwall on Saturday, there was a bit of a bust up between Swindon’s Kevin Amankwaah and Millwall’s veteran striker, Neil “Bomber” Harris. I cannot recall seeing Harris so infuriated in ten years of watching him play. Afterwards, all became clear. Harris fought a long and well-reported battle against testicular cancer several years ago. He told a local newspaper that Amankwaah had sneered at him because of this, making a reference to the fact he possessed only one testicle. Amankwaah, by way of response, lied – he denied saying any such thing. But something happened at Swindon; maybe Amankwaah’s colleagues rounded on him. Because a day later the defender apologized for saying a very nasty thing which had been said “in the heat of the moment, emotions running high”. It was a bit of a mealy-mouthed apology and did not placate even Swindon’s supporters, who bombarded their local newspaper with condemnatory blogs. So, what did Amankwaah say next? Come on, you can guess. It used to be patriotism that was the last refuge of a scoundrel – not any more.
Yes - Amankwaah claimed that he had been racially abused and implied it had been by Harris. I dunno what Bomber said to him out there on the pitch – maybe, when the ball went out of play, he approached Amankwaah and whispered in his ear that he thought Mary Seacole was a useless nurse and wasn’t even black. Certainly Harris denies outright any form of racial abuse, and he has never been accused of such a thing in the past. But an allegation of racism changes everything – and remember, according to British law now, if someone makes an allegation of racism then it is de facto true, rather than the last recourse of some lying thug.
Blogs: Martin Bright | Susan Hill | Alex Massie | Melanie Phillips | Coffee House | Faith Based
Actions: Print this article | Email to a friend | Permalink | Comments (41)
Post this entry to: del.icio.us | Digg | Newsvine | NowPublic | Reddit
Advertisement
1 Yes campaign launch will cause problems — for the independence movement - Ysenda Maxtone Graham
2 Obama vs Balls - edited by Graham Storey, Margaret Brown and Kathle
3 Cameron's attack on Balls is strangely endearing - Lloyd Evans
4 Susie Squire to take over as Tory press chief - James Forsyth
5 What Farage's offer means for David Cameron - James Forsyth
1,700 Unusual Christmas Presents Request Catalogue 01935 815 195 Quote SPEC10 for 10% discount www.presentfinder.co.uk
Pimilco based Florist with online ordering Web: www.olivebranch.net Tel: 020 7630 1868 Fax: 020 7233 8844
62 Shore Road, Warsash, Southampton, SO31 9FT Telephone: 01489 578867 Web site: www.ruffs.co.uk
Apollo Magazine | Corporate | Advertising | Privacy | Terms
Spectator, 22 Old Queen Street, London, SW1H 9HP
All Articles and Content Copyright ©2012 by The Spectator | All Rights Reserved
Hawkeye
October 14th, 2009 11:28am"... according to British law now, if someone makes an allegation of racism then it is de facto true ..."
Another piece of loony legislation that the tories will have to expunge from the statute book.
The cry of "Racist" gets bandied around so freely that I no longer pay any attention to it. Particularly on leftie forums, when someone is losing an argument, out comes the chant "racist". Play the man, not the ball...
Like all such epithets, it is now used so frequently that it is losing its effect, which means that when it really is needed it will no longer work.
David Ossitt
October 14th, 2009 11:45am"and remember, according to British law now, if someone makes an allegation of racism then it is de facto true"
And people wonder at the rise of the BNP!
Bill Flack
October 14th, 2009 11:47amA gentlemen would have apologised and left it at that - I leave you to draw your own conclusions on Mr Amankwaah
Lupus Lungfish
October 14th, 2009 11:47amI'm sure the poets on the Millwall terraces won't have too much trouble coming up with a suitable chant when 'Amankwaah' comes to play in East London.
MNC
October 14th, 2009 11:52amPlaying the race card is outrageous when not true. It takes away from real cases. It's almost like crying rape: There is a massive public outcry at the alleged perpetrator when totally unjustified.
Cheerfulboss
October 14th, 2009 11:57amIam a wanker is just digging himself a bigger hole. Why did he not mention it at the time? Because it didn't happen. He came close to redeeming himself then snatched it back. Look forward to seeing him at The Den unless he is "injured".
Hugh
October 14th, 2009 12:09pmRod, a couple of posts back on this blog your immediate response to the Goldstone report was to accuse newspapers that reported his findings of being 'racist'.
I don't see any difference in your use of the racism tag than either this Swindon Town footballer's or Mary Seacole's PC advocates. It's the useful way of silencing opponents when you don't want to hear what they have to say.
Tiberius
October 14th, 2009 12:12pmThe heading of this thread is probably correct, but let us be in no doubt that if it is, the penultimate refuge of the scoundrel is to cry "Disability Discrimination Act" when his employer finally tires of his uselessness at his job.
Jez
October 14th, 2009 12:19pmThis is old b*llocks Rod.
That 'Froggy, Frog, Frog' Cantona (my opinion only) expelled any rational approach to this back when he 'Katate chopped' a fan he'd taken a dislike to. In broad daylight. In front off 35,000 people. On prime time TV.
And then blamed it on racism?
The liberal media sniggered and let it go- in fact they actually promoted this, as they saw yet another chance to demonise the ones they really don't like- the general public.
The whole mantra of 'racism' (or any liberal left designated '-ism') is a one way street designed to render the host population defencless in regard to our planned / eventual sell-out.
It sucks pal.
Hugh Flange
October 14th, 2009 12:30pmIs this man related to Carlton Cole or Dioff?, these false accusations of racism are becomming very tiresome nowadays, i'd deport the lot of 'em!!
Austin Barry
October 14th, 2009 12:58pmThe truth, rarely admitted, is that we are all empirical racists. For example: a South London street late at night. Ahead of you on one side of the street are some four or five young Chinese blokes, on the other a similar number of young Afro-Caribbeans. On which side will you choose to continue your walk? I suspect that merely positing this issue makes me a racist pedestrian who should be greeted with howls of execration and a suitable term of imprisonment.
rod seacole liddle
October 14th, 2009 1:09pmHugh: what a bizarre comment. My point re Goldstone was that the newspaper reports scarcely mentioned Hamas atrocities because they were biased against Israel.
rod seacole liddle
October 14th, 2009 1:44pmare the Chinese people carrying machetes, Austin?
toby fu manchu forward
October 14th, 2009 1:48pmAustin Barry, you should walk on the side of the Afro-Carribeans, the heirs of Martin Luther King Junior and Maya Angelou. Stay away from my side of the street or you will learn to fear the terror of the tongs.
Dixon
October 14th, 2009 1:55pmI think sir, tis all in Kevins name. For tis it not true he is A mankwer?
Dixon
October 14th, 2009 2:01pmHawkeye and David Osset appear to think Rods every word is the literal truth.
When he said "according to British law now, if someone makes an allegation of racism then it is de facto true" these chaps seem to have taken that as literally a statement of legislative fact, one of them even saying: "thats one more law to be repealed".
West Upper
October 14th, 2009 2:01pmI would have to say that it is similar to Carlton Cole's claim that he was racially abused during the West Ham v Millwall game and Diouf claims recently. It seems that if you are ethnic you can behave badly and then pull out the race card. What can white poeple do?
michael
October 14th, 2009 2:07pmSome nair do well has written 'PAKIS RULE' on my next door neighbours warehouse wall.
Being the local 'GORRAH'(white boy)
begets me six months for such defamatory vocab.
Dixon
October 14th, 2009 2:11pm"Austin Barry
October 14th, 2009 12:58pm
The truth, rarely admitted, is that we are all empirical racists. For example: a South London street late at night. Ahead of you on one side of the street are some four or five young Chinese blokes, on the other a similar number of young Afro-Caribbeans. On which side will you choose to continue your walk? I suspect that merely positing this issue makes me a racist pedestrian who should be greeted with howls of execration and a suitable term of imprisonment."
Actually this is scientifically true. Its called "default assumption" and is the brains way of categorising things according to probability based on prior information. Although it applies to vastly more than race and is almost always unconscious. Experiments show how people tend to quite literally "see" what they expect to see as determined by enculturation. So in a way its nonsense to single out any one person for doing this and calling it "racism".
Real "racism" is a conscious, deliberate choice to treat everyone of one category the same and unfaiurly irrespective of the individual.
And in heated moments, we are all inclined to refer to those who offend us in terms of some obvious feature: "Speccie sod", "Beardie bastard", "Shirt lifter" Etc. Most occasions of people using "racist" language are, I suspect, of that type. The phrase used may often bear no reflection of the person using the phrase.
Anyone else here had the amusing experience of being dubbed a "gringo"?
Immanuel Seacole Kant
October 14th, 2009 2:21pmThe racial equality industry is the recognition of all our duties as divine commands.
Lupus Lungfish
October 14th, 2009 2:28pmAustin- take a taxi if I were you, you don't stand a chance!
Donald F Arting
October 14th, 2009 2:41pmI expect Amankwaah contacted The Voice to seek their responce to such alligations from Harris, maybe it took two days to come back with the answer used by Amankwaah.
Carl Gordon-Brown
October 14th, 2009 2:45pmI'm surprised that nobody has commented on the comic value of Mr Amawankaah's name.
Jez
October 14th, 2009 3:11pmAustin barry;
"The truth, rarely admitted, is that we are all empirical racists. For example: a South London street late at night. Ahead of you on one side of the street are some four or five young Chinese blokes, on the other a similar number of young Afro-Caribbeans."
Good question Austin. Good Question.
Which side of the South London road would i head for?
Personally it'd depend whether i was feeling like scoring some Crack or purchasing some pirate DVD porn.
That's what you mean't isn't it?
;)
hiro
October 14th, 2009 3:21pmHow about if Harris was whispering in his ear all match - "you dirty n word"? Would you snap? More facts I think are needed without stirring up more screaming, hysterical race "debates".
R Mitchum
October 14th, 2009 3:26pmA 70 year old neighbour in West London was accused of racism by a young woman who "had it in for him". He was immediately charged and then dragged through the magistrates courts for over a year before it was decided he should go "without a stain on his character". The experience nearly killed him and this former servicemen left for Spain. Like him I now feel no allegiance to this country.
Wilhelm
October 14th, 2009 3:33pmRod Liddle
The '' racist'' word is now meaningless, its like the 17 century when if you didnt go along with the puritan way of life you were denouced as a '' witch ''.
Today if you arent fussy with the multiculty way of life and prefer a monoculture, you are denouced as a racist, ho hum.
John Lea
October 14th, 2009 3:33pmSimilar thing happened with that idiot Al-Hadji Diouf. I remember that he spat at some opposition fans once for patting him on the head. Afterwards he claimed that patting a black person on the head was racist! He subsequently went on to spit at other people - on and off the pitch (it sort of became his trademark - and I can only assume that they, too, were racists.
Wilhelm
October 14th, 2009 3:50pmRemember when Jamican Darcus Howe and Joan Rivers was on a Radio 4 programme.
Old Darcus had done a tedious Channel 4 programme about how he doesnt get along with
his son. Joan Rivers chipped in and said '' well you've got 7 kids from 4 different woman, its chaos.''
Darcus knew he was in the wrong but played the racist card and squeeeeeeled RACIST at Joan Rivers but Joan was having none of it and screeeeeeemed back at him and put Darcus in his place.
It was all over the papers.
David Ossitt
October 14th, 2009 4:44pmDixon
"Hawkeye and David Osset appear to think Rods every word is the literal truth"
Who is this David Osset? never heard of him.
Rod only ever tells the truth; unless of course he is lying and even then I would still prefer to believe him.
N
October 14th, 2009 6:36pmAh, what a great role model for the kids who look up to him. "Hey kids, being responsible for your own actions is stupid. Be an a-hole! If someone calls you on it, simply twist the situation so THEY are the bad guys! Yeah!"
This is sad on so many levels.
Noa Zrk
October 14th, 2009 6:37pmRod. I see what is now happening as an opportunity for forward thinking teams, rather than an expose of a weakness in the definition of an criminal officence; although one generally expects the criminal to have the intention to commit a crime and not the 'victim'. But football, or any other sports teams, now have the ability to never loose a game on the basis of discrimination. You racist ref, that was never a goal! Is it coz I is black? All in all teams should now ensure they contain a heathy majority of feign and ethnic players. Oh, I forgot. The successful ones do already.
Luddite
October 14th, 2009 8:20pmSticks and stones? but this is not about name calling is it, this is about political addventage and addvensment. The Labour's party has opened a pandora box race and racism will be big in election year and Labour will be the loser.
Stephanie Tohill
October 15th, 2009 8:44amAustin Barry,
It would depend on how they were dressed and how they were acting. If the black guys were dressed in the 'nerd' fashion or suits I wouldn't care. Baggy jeans and hoods and maybe I'd be more nervous. Same for the East Asian. It's not as simple as black/white/asian etc as far as I'm concerned.
Although that said I've been in South London many a time and have yet to feel threatened by seeing a group of black guys. I'm always around such a diverse set of people it's hard for me to form set impressions.
Nicholas
October 15th, 2009 9:42amN "Be an a-hole! If someone calls you on it, simply twist the situation so THEY are the bad guys!"
That seems to me a perfect description of the creed of the Left. They manipulate the language of the debate rather than address the substance of it in order to prevail, resorting to the dog-whistle and the tried and tested diversion when it looks like the plain truth might be exposed.
I have been witness to it for more than 50 years but the ever-more inventive dishonesty and hypocrisy of the Left still astounds me.
Hugh
October 15th, 2009 10:46amRod, thanks for your reply. The only thing that’s bizarre is your failure to recognise the similarities between your use of the racist tag and the rest of the examples mentioned in the thread. In your post on Goldstone you acknowledged that you hadn’t read it but you immediately cried “racist” at the newspapers reporting on it. Neither your claims of racism nor I suspect any of the others mentioned here are supported by any evidence – so what’s the difference between you and them? One of degree maybe but the underlying knee-jerk approach is pretty similar.
Also, I can’t help but notice that in your reply to me you’re not repeating your racist allegation re these newspapers and instead describing these papers as merely “biased”. I can sympathise given the title of this post, but as the scoundrel's last refuge is to cry “racist” how about going all the way and retracting that post you did accusing the newspapers of being racist?
rod seacole liddle
October 15th, 2009 11:28amHugh - I repeat. You clearly do not understand the point. I am not, in the above, attempting to say that racism does not exist.
hiro
October 15th, 2009 12:31pmRacist maybe an over used word, but racism is still a massive part of our society. You just have to look at the structures of power in this country to understand that.
rod seacole liddle
October 15th, 2009 1:10pmOh, Hiro, get a grip, mate.
The REAL Mary Seacole
October 15th, 2009 2:23pmI used to work for the London Probation Service. Playing the 'race card' was a routine last refuge for black 'scoundrels'. I remember one black Trainee PO who was 'discontinued' (a Probation term) because she failed to complete the requirements of the programme (e.g. not submitting essays, failing to be available to be observed in practice (in other words, not coming to work), etc). This was, I understand, because she was unable to organise her work commitments around her family responsibilities as a single mother. Fair enough.
Inevitably (regrettably) she put in a grievance on the basis of racial discrimination (with absolutely no supporting evidence). Her case (equally inevitably) failed. However, the thoroughness of the investigation (and, frankly, the fact that it was even considered in the first place) was a reminder (if one were needed) that, in this particular sector of the, erm, public sector, paler-faced staff members are presumed to be guilty of racism unless proved otherwise.
Broucek Minibean
October 16th, 2009 11:26amIf you believe that prejudices of whatever form (racial, class, status etc) can ever be eradicated from any society you may as well join the Flat Earth Appreciation Society.