What killed Sally Clark’s child?

Wednesday, 16th May 2007

Neville Hodgkinson asks why the jury in the Sally Clark trial was told to discount the DTP jab given to her second child, Harry, just five hours before he was found dead

Sally Clark spent three and a half years in jail wrongly convicted of murdering two of her babies after a jury was assured there was no other explanation for their sudden deaths than that she had deliberately smothered them. Yet five hours before her second child, Harry, was found lifeless in his baby chair, he had been injected with a combined vaccine with a long history of serious adverse reactions.

Harry was eight weeks old, the regulation age for the first of three injections against diphtheria, tetanus, pertussis (DTP) and Hib (a bacterial infection that can cause meningitis). He was also given an oral polio vaccine. His biological age was five weeks, as he had been born three weeks premature. Because of the previous sudden death of his brother, Christopher, his breathing was being monitored. He was uncharacteristically dozy from the time of his jabs to the time he died.

1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 Next page

More articles from: Neville Hodgkinson | this section

Print this article | Email to a friend | Permalink | Comments (4)

Post this entry to: del.icio.us | Digg | Newsvine | NowPublic | Reddit

Post comment

carol jewell

March 16th, 2009 8:43am Report this comment

Sally and her family deserve justice for her and her family. To cover up the fact the little baby had had a combination of chemicals pumped into it's body should have those involved in administering this lethal cocktail in the High Court. There is a link between the condition of the little baby and the administering of the injections. The baby was said to have been sniffeling before the injections were given. This was a sign all was not well and to then inject the baby with these chemicals was an appalling act of medical irresponsibility. The all too freely of flooding synthetic chemicals into the body just has to be vigorously opposed. In the case of babies who are showing signs and symptoms ( as Sally's little boy did ) of a weakness in the pituitary gland, the chemicals would have a further devastating effect on this gland and major organ failure would result. The most common cause of the symtoms the baby was showing would be the presence of the viruses Measles; Mumps; Chicken-pox; Rubella in the central nervous system..

Jack Humphries

July 31st, 2009 7:34pm Report this comment

It is probable that the person who vaccinated the child killed the child, complicit with the person who instructed that the child be vaccinated, and the parent/s of the child who consented for the child to be vaccinated.

Nick Hewes

August 3rd, 2009 10:51pm Report this comment

"No lesson seems to be so deeply inculcated by the experience of life as that you should never trust experts"

Lord Salsbury, (letter to Lord Lytton), 1877

Lisa Blakemore-Brown

December 3rd, 2009 6:21pm Report this comment

It may be of interest to readers of this article that Sir Roy Meadow has now mysteriously removed himself from the General Medical Council Register. Read about it in the following article I have just written:

http://www.theoneclickgroup.co.uk/news.php?start=3100&end=3120&view=yes&id=4111#newspost

Post comment