I have a piece in today's Times on Vaughan Williams. Here it is:
Do the names Alexander Goehr or Nicholas Maw mean anything to you? Here are two slightly better known names from the same profession: Sir Peter Maxwell Davies and Sir Harrison Birtwistle.
Still no idea? This one's the giveaway: Ralph Vaughan Williams.
They are all, as the last name will have told you, English composers. But while Vaughan Williams was and remains a household name, the other composers are known only to the coterie that now listens to contemporary music. Sir Peter is Master of the Queen's Music (the musical equivalent of Poet Laureate) and Sir Harrison is regarded by those who care about such things as the leading composer of his generation. Yet I doubt if anyone but a few people have listened to their works.
Vaughan Williams died 50 years ago tomorrow. He had a good innings - he died at 85 - but his death was symbolic of another death: that of contemporary classical music as a mainstream cultural activity.
In Vaughan Williams's day, the premiere of a new work of music was a significant event. No one would be considered culturally aware unless they were au fait with the new Vaughan Williams symphony. Today, any averagely informed person has read the latest fiction and seen the buzz films and theatre. But new music - serious rather than pop or rock - is a cult pursuit among a tiny proportion of the already small minority who are interested in culture.
Classical music took a wrong turn in the period after the death of Vaughan Williams. The ruination of music as part of mainstream culture came largely because of subsidy. Composers stopped writing for their public and wrote instead for the small clique that was responsible for commissioning pieces. The cultural commissars were obsessed with theories of music that held that melody was no longer a legitimate tool and only atonal music was appropriate to the age. Their dominance of the subsidy racket meant that not only were composers freed from any obligation to secure an audience for their music, but they were pilloried and starved of funds also if they did attempt to do that.
Vaughan Williams was the last composer to speak directly to a wide audience, with music that could be appreciated by listeners who did not have degrees in musical theory. One reason was basic: he wrote tonal music. But another was that there was something very English in his music. It wasn't just his use of folk music themes or the stories and places on which he based so much of his work - pieces such as A London Symphony, In the Fen Country, Norfolk Rhapsody, Five Tudor Portraits, Sir John in Love, A Pilgrim's Progress, the Fantasia on Greensleeves, and the Fantasia on a Theme of Thomas Tallis. It was the sound itself. His most frequently played piece, The Lark Ascending, captures the lyrical essence of the still, quiet idealised English countryside. And there is a similar, if indefinable, Englishness about almost everything he wrote.
But just as in so many areas of our lives the English often conceal passion under a calm exterior, so Vaughan Williams's music had far more to it than the lyricism of The Lark Ascending. His Symphony No. 6, for instance, which was premiered in 1948, has violent thrusts and agonised harmonies, and many of his other pieces have dark undercurrents.
The only contemporary composer who had anything close to Vaughan Williams's recognition was Benjamin Britten. Despite his avowed attempt to excise from his work what he regarded as the stultifying parochialism of the English musical scene, he too was a recognisably English composer. His breakthrough came with Peter Grimes, an opera set in a village that could easily have been his home town, Aldeburgh. And his lover and musical partner, the tenor Peter Pears, sounded as English as the Queen.
After decades in which contemporary music lived in a ghetto, a new generation of composers started to emerge in the 1990s. As the older generation lost its grip on the purse strings, so younger composers have started to write music that wider audiences can enjoy. James MacMillan, a Scottish composer, is as intellectually rigorous as any of his predecessors but has the priceless gift of connecting with audiences. The norm for performances of contemporary music was a premiere and perhaps one or two further subsidised repeats, then deserved obscurity. MacMillan's music has entered the mainstream repertoire because audiences want to hear it.
The leading young English composer is Thomas Adès, whose opera Powder Her Face won rave reviews in 1995 and has since been repeatedly performed around the world. He has been commissioned by the likes of the Royal Opera House and the Berlin Philharmonic and has produced pieces that have won instant audience acclaim.
Adès may be English but, unlike Vaughan Williams, there is almost nothing in his music to show that. Vaughan Williams may no longer be the last to write serious music for general audiences but, as a recognisably English composer, he was indeed the last of his kind.
Blogs: Clive Davis | Melanie Phillips | Americano | Coffee House | Trading Floor
Actions: Print this article | Email to a friend | Permalink | Comments (6)
Post this entry to: del.icio.us | Digg | Newsvine | NowPublic | Reddit
Advertisement
Oliver Kamm
Politics, economics and culture from the master. Unmissable.
Daniel Finkelstein's Times Comment Central
A daily must-read.
Tim Worstall
Lots of interesting nibbles - and a ruthless swatter of economic gibberish.
Marginal Revolution
Tyler Cowen's riveting economic blog.
Harry's Place
Must-read left of centre blog from writers who understand the threat to the West.
Thought Experiments
The peerless Bryan Appleyard's blog.
Opera Chic
An American in Milan, on opera.
Intermezzo
A London-based classical music enthusiast.
Jessica Duchen's classical music blog
Does what it says on the tin.
Samizdata
Libertarian blog, packed every day.
Norm's blog
The thoroughly sensible thoughts of renowned left-wing academic Norman Geras, Professor of Government at Manchester. And cricket, too.
Public Interest
Peter Briffa's inimitable take on The Yazzmonster and other assorted demons.
Reform
The public sector reform group; their website is an invaluable source of data and ideas.
Centre for the New Europe
The leading European public policy think tank.
Take advantage of unbeatable Nissan value. Book a test drive today.
Luxury all inclusive travel to remote and exotic destinations.
Take advantage of unbeatable Nissan value. Book a test drive today.
Luxury all inclusive travel to remote and exotic destinations.
PORTA METRONIA, ROME Standing high on the top of one of the seven hills of Rome- the Coelian- this unique
ROME and PARIS: over 350 holiday rentals apartments listed: visit www.romanreference.com and www.parisreference.com or call +39 0648 903612.
Goldsmiths by Design Welcome to Ruffs! You have found a company of Goldsmiths that specialises in the manufacture, amongst other
Spectator Business | Apollo Magazine
Corporate | Advertising | Privacy | Terms
Spectator, 22 Old Queen Street, London, SW1H 9HP
All Articles and Content Copyright ©2008 by The Spectator | All Rights Reserved
Nick Biskinis
August 25th, 2008 8:32pmWhat about Carl Jenkins; you might find him too populist, but surely he does compose striking music that is both a continuation and innovator of classical intrumental music?
paul p
August 26th, 2008 2:42amWould I be right in thinking Birtwhistle et al will be delighted?
Fran Waddams
August 26th, 2008 12:31pmPopulist again, but what about John Rutter whose music in the golden English choral tradition delights those who sing and listen to it. (although his Christmas carol about the little donkey is a true donkey.)
John
August 26th, 2008 8:27pmI think you are both overstating and understating the case. This is not a specifically English thing at all. You can see the same effect across the whole Western world. How many people know of Carter, one of the giants of American classical music, who at 100 (!) is still writing music?
It is all part of the general dumbing down of education and culture in the west.
Neil Ferguson
August 29th, 2008 4:00amApril Fools? No, you wouldn't know about that. However. I listened to a few selections of MacMillan and Ades on youtube. None would have been out of place in a "contemporary" music concert of 1930. The subsidies continue, and so does the bilge.
If any music of the latter 20th century is played 100 years from now it will be from the likes of (unsubsidized) Miklos Rozsa and Bernard Hermann, Gershwin, even Bernstein.
Marcus Cotswell
August 29th, 2008 9:39amYou do make me laugh, Stephen. "Today, any averagely informed person has read the latest fiction and seen the buzz films and theatre". Really?! The averagely informed luvvie maybe!
I'd say that someone who was "averagely" informed hardly ever reads a book, and visits the theatre rather less often, with musicals and Christmas panto the (occasional) exceptions. If by "the latest buzz films" you mean Hollywood blockbusters, then that part, at least, is probably true.
I read a lot of books (many more, I would hazard, than the "average") but I can't remember the last time I picked up a contemporary work of fiction, and I generally find theatre overpriced and uncomfortable (I'm a fairly large 6'2" with long legs) so I don't go much.
But I did cram myself in to the Albert Hall last night to enjoy the première of a rather interesting piece of contemporary music, followed by some glorious Gershwin (Piano Concerto in F major) and stunning Stravinsky (the incomparable Rite of Spring).