I couldn't agree more with Daniel Finkelstein:
But I just have to ask - why does Heather Mills get £24 million for being married to McCartney for four years?Did she play a role in making the money? No, he earned his fortune before he met her.
Did she sacrifice her earnings or earning power while standin' by her man? No, she is certainly more marketable now than before she met McCartney. And any deterioration that has taken place in the last year has been as a result of her behaviour since the divorce.
Does she need £600,000 a year? No, nobody needs £600,000 a year. There might have been a case of her having become accustomed to it during their marriage, except for this - she was only married to him for a very short time.
Isn't it for the child? There is a separate sum - £35,000 plus nanny and school fees - for the child.
The question has nothing to do with Ms Mills seeming to be a spectacularly unpleasant woman. Even if she had been a veritable saint, it seems ridiculous that she - or anyone else - should be handed such a sum for four years of marriage to a man whose success and fortune had nothing whatsoever to do with their marriage.
One might suggest that it is Sir Paul who deserved compensation for four years of marriage to Heather Mills. But that would be ungallant, so best not.
Blogs: Clive Davis | Melanie Phillips | Americano | Coffee House | Trading Floor
Actions: Print this article | Email to a friend | Permalink | Comments (6)
Post this entry to: del.icio.us | Digg | Newsvine | NowPublic | Reddit
Advertisement
Oliver Kamm
Politics, economics and culture from the master. Unmissable.
Daniel Finkelstein's Times Comment Central
A daily must-read.
Tim Worstall
Lots of interesting nibbles - and a ruthless swatter of economic gibberish.
Marginal Revolution
Tyler Cowen's riveting economic blog.
Harry's Place
Must-read left of centre blog from writers who understand the threat to the West.
Thought Experiments
The peerless Bryan Appleyard's blog.
Opera Chic
An American in Milan, on opera.
Intermezzo
A London-based classical music enthusiast.
Jessica Duchen's classical music blog
Does what it says on the tin.
Samizdata
Libertarian blog, packed every day.
Norm's blog
The thoroughly sensible thoughts of renowned left-wing academic Norman Geras, Professor of Government at Manchester. And cricket, too.
Public Interest
Peter Briffa's inimitable take on The Yazzmonster and other assorted demons.
Reform
The public sector reform group; their website is an invaluable source of data and ideas.
Centre for the New Europe
The leading European public policy think tank.
Build your own Sky package online. Sky TV, Broadband & Talk only £16.
Sky TV & free broadband packages available from £16 a month. Choose from a standard free sky box, sky plus or sky hd.
Exclusive web deals and latest ship reviews.
Build your own Sky package online. Sky TV, Broadband & Talk only £16.
Sky TV & free broadband packages available from £16 a month. Choose from a standard free sky box, sky plus...
PORTA METRONIA, ROME Standing high on the top of one of the seven hills of Rome- the Coelian- this unique
ROME and PARIS: over 350 holiday rentals apartments listed: visit www.romanreference.com and www.parisreference.com or call +39 0648 903612.
Goldsmiths by Design Welcome to Ruffs! You have found a company of Goldsmiths that specialises in the manufacture, amongst other
Spectator Business | Apollo Magazine
Corporate | Advertising | Privacy | Terms
Spectator, 22 Old Queen Street, London, SW1H 9HP
All Articles and Content Copyright ©2008 by The Spectator | All Rights Reserved
Jennie
March 17th, 2008 6:40pmThe average length of marriage at divorce is less than 12 years, so McCartney and Mills were married for about a third of the average. So, not so long, but not so short either. And I'd say that four years is plenty of time to have become accustomed to a life of luxury.
Water
March 17th, 2008 7:10pmYour hitting them out of the park today Pollard.
Verity
March 17th, 2008 7:37pmThat's OK. Girls can be ungallant. McCartney was probably only too glad to be scraping her off the bottom of his shoe, and thought the price was worth it. Far from helping him develop his long and spectacularly successful career, she has done nothing but embarrass him for the last couple of years, so she should actually be in a negative position.
Joshua
March 17th, 2008 11:29pm"No, nobody needs £600,000 a year." -- Finkelstein needs to get out more.
THX1138
March 18th, 2008 12:29pmTo Quote Dorothy Parker. " If you want to know what God thinks of money,just look at the people he gave it to"
patricia
March 18th, 2008 3:00pmMaybe Spectator readers should be compensated for having to put up with offensive bloggers like you and Melanie Phillips?