I have a piece in today's Times on the dyslexic medical student who is suing the GMC. Here it is:
Here's my problem: I love flying. I get a huge thrill at that moment when an aircraft accelerates on the runway and starts to take off. And so, since I've been a child, I've wanted to learn to fly.But I can't. I have an unusual eye problem, one of the effects of which is that I do not have 3-D vision. So I'll never be allowed to fly an aircraft, because under Civil Aviation Authority rules my eye condition bars me from getting a pilot's licence.
I've always reasoned that although it's unfortunate that fate has determined that I will never wear a pilot's wings, the CAA must know what is and isn't necessary to fly safely, and if 3-D vision is needed, it's clearly sensible that it bans people like me from piloting aircraft. So instead of flying jumbo jets I do what my body will allow me to do and write for The Times. I've managed to live with the disappointment.
But a 21-year-old medical student, Naomi Gadian, takes a different view. Ms Gadian is dyslexic and is suing the General Medical Council because it uses multiple-choice tests as part of its qualification procedures. As a dyslexic, she finds them difficult. And she says that this means she is being discriminated against.
Forgive me, Ms Gadian, but you're missing the point. You're not being discriminated against. You're being weeded out. It's quite deliberate. If you can't read or write sufficiently well to pass a multiple-choice test, you shouldn't be a doctor.
To be blunt: someone who can't be sure to read 18mg rather than 81mg and who mistakes peroxone for paracetamol is not someone I'd want practising medicine on me - even if they had a wonderful bedside manner and a passion for medicine.
According to Ms Gadian: “Patients aren't going to ask you, ‘Here's four answers. Which one is right?'” Hmmm. Isn't that more or less precisely what patients are going to ask her? It's certainly what I do when I see a doctor. I go over alternative explanations and treatments for my symptoms and get expert advice about which one is right for me.
I'm sure that Ms Gadian is a lovely, caring woman who would, if it were not for her inability to pass the tests designed to see if she would make a good addition to the medical register, be a good addition to the medical register. But not everyone can do everything, and if she can't pass her tests, she can't practise.
It's never occurred to me that the Civil Aviation Authority is discriminating against me. There are just some things that I can do and some that I can't, because of the body I was born with. That's life. It's my lot.
The GMC should have only one response to Ms Gadian: “These are the rules. Shape up or ship out.”
Blogs: Clive Davis | Melanie Phillips | Americano | Coffee House | Trading Floor
Actions: Print this article | Email to a friend | Permalink | Comments (17)
Post this entry to: del.icio.us | Digg | Newsvine | NowPublic | Reddit
Advertisement
Oliver Kamm
Politics, economics and culture from the master. Unmissable.
Daniel Finkelstein's Times Comment Central
A daily must-read.
Tim Worstall
Lots of interesting nibbles - and a ruthless swatter of economic gibberish.
Marginal Revolution
Tyler Cowen's riveting economic blog.
Harry's Place
Must-read left of centre blog from writers who understand the threat to the West.
Thought Experiments
The peerless Bryan Appleyard's blog.
Opera Chic
An American in Milan, on opera.
Intermezzo
A London-based classical music enthusiast.
Jessica Duchen's classical music blog
Does what it says on the tin.
Samizdata
Libertarian blog, packed every day.
Norm's blog
The thoroughly sensible thoughts of renowned left-wing academic Norman Geras, Professor of Government at Manchester. And cricket, too.
Public Interest
Peter Briffa's inimitable take on The Yazzmonster and other assorted demons.
Reform
The public sector reform group; their website is an invaluable source of data and ideas.
Centre for the New Europe
The leading European public policy think tank.
Take advantage of unbeatable Nissan value. Book a test drive today.
Take advantage of unbeatable Nissan value. Book a test drive today.
PORTA METRONIA, ROME Standing high on the top of one of the seven hills of Rome- the Coelian- this unique
ROME and PARIS: over 350 holiday rentals apartments listed: visit www.romanreference.com and www.parisreference.com or call +39 0648 903612.
Goldsmiths by Design Welcome to Ruffs! You have found a company of Goldsmiths that specialises in the manufacture, amongst other
Spectator Business | Apollo Magazine
Corporate | Advertising | Privacy | Terms
Spectator, 22 Old Queen Street, London, SW1H 9HP
All Articles and Content Copyright ©2008 by The Spectator | All Rights Reserved
Ray
July 31st, 2008 8:03amCall me old-fashioned, but it rather echoes the decision by police forces to scrap the 5ft 8ins minimum height requirement.
I'm sure pint-sized coppers can make brilliant detectives, but when it comes to controlling a gang of yobs the policeman who is a beefy 6ft 5ins might find the malcontents pay a bit more attention to his stentorian rendition of "Hello, hello, what's all this then?" that they do his weedy 5ft 2ins companion.
Chris M
July 31st, 2008 8:31amAll must have prizes!!
Debra
July 31st, 2008 8:40amFlying - That is small potatoes compared with the disgraceful behaviour of Blunkett in office. How dare you insult the British Tax Payer with your nonsense. Ordinary people work hard and risk life and limb whilst some of you journalists play fast and loose with national life and morality. Could you not find a better more elevating topic for a book.Here is a story about an RAF Pilot who said Lord how can I know my life is in your hands, at that moment the plane dived and stalled, he ejected and was dragged along the ground, but was still alive. The clean fear of God is the beginning of wisdom, fornicating in public office brings serious consequences so how dare you be so flippant.
Chris M
July 31st, 2008 9:43amDebra - is it happy hour so early? These cheap alcohol promotions must come to an end promoting as they do such bizarre and irrational behaviour.
Jacko
July 31st, 2008 10:08amSpot on, Stephen.
What this young lady needs is a 100mg dose of old-fashioned common sense! Unfortunately, as we all know, common sense is increasingly being supplanted by nutty political correctness.
Apropos common sense, I imagine you must have seen the reports about the government's proposed changes to the murder laws? If I understand these insane proposals correctly, they would give a "partial defence" to cold blooded murderers who could show that their victim had said something to cause serious offence or insult?
It's truly terrifying to think that journalists and bloggers (your buddy Oliver Kamm comes to mind!) could effectively be giving the targets of their attacks a license to kill them!
Mob-violence enshrined in English law? There was a time when I would have thought the very idea laughable. But now I'm not so sure..
Kim Plumtree
July 31st, 2008 11:02am"I'm sure that Ms Gadian is a lovely, caring woman who would, if it were not for her inability to pass the tests designed to see if she would make a good addition to the medical register, be a good addition to the medical register."
Aren't you being over-generous? Her feminist/teen self-absorption tells another story.
Richard Morgan
July 31st, 2008 2:15pmAs a dyslexic ... I was slightly offended by the title for this article. However I cannot fault the reasoning in this article.
The irony for me is that as a dyslexic I found multiple choice questions much easier to handle than written word, I fail see why multiple choice questions would cause her issue.
Your comment about getting 18 mixed up with 81 is somewhat arrogant as we all make mistakes. However considering how often I fail to write down account and telephone numbers correctly makes me glad they aren't attached to a live and death situation.
Where you comments are unfortunately stupid is that it is quite likely you have been seen by a dyslexic doctor in your time (have you seen the average hand written prescription?) All a dyslexic has to do is pass the exam to become a doctor and many of us are very smart indeed. I've a degree in Mathematics for instance.
So swap out the word dyslexic with 'black', 'lesbian', 'Muslim' in your title and it would clearly be offensive. Do we dyslexics have no feelings? Should we as a minority group be more political to rise awareness? Let off some bombs to get attention?
Dare I say that we dyslexics of the world should untie?
Ben
July 31st, 2008 5:53pmHere here, Richard!
Juan Kerr
July 31st, 2008 7:12pmVery well said Mr Pollard.
Blame the medical student by all means. But the real blame should be put to the legal profession, the judiciary and most of all, the frigwit who signed us up to whatever piece of legislation makes such actions possible.
andy
July 31st, 2008 7:37pmI'm dyslexic, and I fully agree with Stephen.
Elizabeth
July 31st, 2008 10:29pmDyslexics vary a lot, and many would make perfectly capable doctors, even if they occasionally check a spelling or are weak on foreign languages. I agree, however, that it sounds as if this student is quite severely effected, and dyslexia is not a reason to be exempted from basic tests that other students take. Some dyslexic students are OK on multiple choice tests if give some extra time - perhaps that could be considered in this case. However, if she is totally unable to take a multiple choice test, maybe she should re-consider her career.
Elizabeth
July 31st, 2008 10:38pmI am dyslexic my self. and I agree with Richard Morgan's comments - dyslexics are not all the same, and it is offensive to say that they are. I also agree that allowing reasonable support is not the same as exempting students from important tests. Patients might be understandably concerned if that happened.
Cathy Ross
August 1st, 2008 2:32pmSo good to read your article on the dyslexic medical student. It's pinned on my notice board.
jonathan
August 1st, 2008 3:25pm"Where you comments are unfortunately stupid is that it is quite likely you have been seen by a dyslexic doctor in your time (have you seen the average hand written prescription?) All a dyslexic has to do is pass the exam to become a doctor and many of us are very smart indeed"
and
"I am dyslexic my self. and I agree with Richard Morgan's comments - dyslexics are not all the same, and it is offensive to say that they are"
If you are so dyslexic that you can't read an exam paper, you shouldn't do the job. If your dyslexia does not prevent you passing the exams, it should not prevent you doing the job.
This isn't hard.
Richard Morgan
August 3rd, 2008 11:35amNo this isn't hard. Passing the exams it the criteria for entering a profession. This girl should not be allowed to skip multiple choice exams, her argument is silly to say the least.
However Stephan goes further than this.
"I don't want to be treated by a dyslexic doctor" and "someone who can't be sure to read 18mg rather than 81mg and who mistakes peroxone for paracetamol is not someone I'd want practising medicine on me"
Is this an argument for keeping dyslexics out of medicine? Or is this just a misunderstanding about what dyslexia is?
Fowler
August 3rd, 2008 7:15pm"Ben 5:53" says "Here, here".
But WHERE? The cheering encouragement should be "Hear, hear".
This is the second or third time I have seen this error in a blog in as many weeks.
Lochani Ganegoda
August 11th, 2008 4:25pmStephen pollard clearly does not understand what dyslexia is. I suggest he does more research into the condition before he writes his articles. Surely every writer should know what they are talking about. From his comments, he has a severe lack of knowledge as to what dyslexia entails, the types of dyslexia and its variation and severity to say the least.
There are other ways to test knowledge. There are highly qualified consultant psychologists who would fully support some dyslexics being doctors and some of which would need different txpes of testing to the normal. Also, you forget that there are different medical professions that doctors can specialise in.
The man who holds the world record for retaining the most numerical information and repeating it backwards is dyslexic.
I would wish for dyslexia rather than naivity and stupidity.