Friday 9 January 2009

 

The latest culture as recommended by our staff

Peter Hoskin

Pete suggests


Olympic gold

Monday, 11th August 2008

So I guess I must now be an Olympics addict. The two mainstream sports which bore me most are cycling and swimming (yes, even more than tennis). And yet I have been thrilled by the success of Nicole Cooke and Rebecca Adlington. I suppose I'll even watch Andy Murray when he starts his pursuit of Olympics gold.

Mind you, there's been one aspect of the Olympics - or rather of the BBC's coverage of it - which has enraged me. So far I've heard three commentators say a variation on the theme of: 'That'll keep the critics of the London games quiet'.

No it won't. Those of us who are appalled that London won, and that we are going to have to fork out billions of pounds to stage the games, are not anti-sport, let alone anti-Olympics. We just want someone else to have the dubious honour of paying for it.

(I'm being flippant. There's a serious argument to be had about the cost of the games and how and by whom it should be funded).

Blogs: Clive Davis | Melanie Phillips | Americano | Coffee House | Trading Floor

Actions: Print this article  |  Email to a friend  |  Permalink  |   Comments (8)

Subscribe now

Post this entry to:   del.icio.us | Digg | Newsvine | NowPublic | Reddit

Comments

Post a comment


Your comment:*

Your name:*

Your email address:*
(We won't publish this)

*Required information

Please click the button only once - your comment will not be published immediately

Simon Cawkwell

August 11th, 2008 11:47am

Surely, the really serious comment to be made is that Jowell, no doubt on the orders of her then boss, Blair, elected to tell a massive downright lie as to the cost of the Olympics. She declared a cost for the Olympics of £2.5bn as against a cost that she certainly already then knew of c. £10bn. The purpose of the lie was to conceal the pledging of future taxation revenue to gain an electoral advantage. This is of course merely an extension of Brown's lies about financing the economy. But Jowell told the lies and she should surely get out of politics. Who will hound her?

Curmudgeon

August 11th, 2008 12:26pm

The Chinese have spent $40 billion on these Games. They see this as a symbol of national pride and re-emergence, rather than in mere terms of profit and loss.

Does Britain want to approach the Games in this sense, or do we want to unleash the bean counters? This is a decision that is yet to be made.

Familiar Clown

August 11th, 2008 3:35pm

Don't be "appalled that London won" Stephen. See it as regeneration. London is London after all, its not in China. And at least those 52 pylons will be down.

John

August 11th, 2008 5:49pm

We have enough pride as it is, thanks all the same. We don't need this utterly corrupt circus - from the disgusting IOC to the disgusting Jowell - to prove it.

Very down Down Under

August 12th, 2008 2:46am

A problem I have with the Olympics is that the general tedium is made worse by inane commentary. Here are two examples from the Australian coverage of the opening ceremony:
"When you think of Bhutan, you think of archery"
and, a different jabberer when the Japanese team entered the stadium:
"They have an interesting relationship with China over the years, having invaded before World War II"

Roy

August 12th, 2008 10:17am

Big is not always beautiful. What's wrong with London putting on a modest affair? Showing an example; that it's time the Olympic Games were brought down to earth and shouldn't be forced to put on a world circus spectacular to beat all previous ones! Let them with the spare cash do the spending, unless of course the advocators for the games wish to put in their own money!

Chris M

August 12th, 2008 1:02pm

I feel another Millenium Dome moment coming on. But this time even more vainglorious. Not to mention expensive.

John

August 12th, 2008 7:15pm

Roy, when the British vote stupid megalomaniacs into office, you can't expect them to understand that small is beautiful.

The Spectator Parliamentarian Awards
Spectator Book Club

Stephen Pollard's Blog Roll

Oliver Kamm
Politics, economics and culture from the master. Unmissable.

Daniel Finkelstein's Times Comment Central
A daily must-read. 

Tim Worstall 
Lots of interesting nibbles - and a ruthless swatter of economic gibberish.

Marginal Revolution
Tyler Cowen's riveting economic blog.

Harry's Place
Must-read left of centre blog from writers who understand the threat to the West. 

Thought Experiments
The peerless Bryan Appleyard's blog.

Opera Chic
An American in Milan, on opera.

Intermezzo
A London-based classical music enthusiast.

Jessica Duchen's classical music blog
Does what it says on the tin.

Samizdata
Libertarian blog, packed every day.

Norm's blog
The thoroughly sensible thoughts of renowned left-wing academic Norman Geras, Professor of Government at Manchester. And cricket, too.

Public Interest
Peter Briffa's inimitable take on The Yazzmonster and other assorted demons.

Reform
The public sector reform group; their website is an invaluable source of data and ideas.

Centre for the New Europe
The leading European public policy think tank.

Spectator recommends

Nissan Family Cars - Book a Test Drive Online

Take advantage of unbeatable Nissan value. Book a test drive today.


Spectator classifieds

ROME CENTRE

PORTA METRONIA, ROME Standing high on the top of one of the seven hills of Rome- the Coelian- this unique

City Breaks. ROME and PARIS

ROME and PARIS: over 350 holiday rentals apartments listed: visit  www.romanreference.com  and  www.parisreference.com or call +39 0648 903612.

Jewellery. RUFFS (Estd. 1904).

Goldsmiths by Design Welcome to Ruffs!  You have found a company of Goldsmiths that specialises in the manufacture, amongst other