Drawings and computer-generated images of child sex abuse would be made illegal under proposals announced by Justice Minister Maria Eagle.
Owners of such images would face up to three years in prison under the plans.
Under the Obscene Publications Act it is illegal to possess photos of child abuse but it is legal to own drawings and computer-generated images.
I'm happy to be shown that I'm wrong, but it seems to me that this moves us into the realms of legislating against thought crimes.
I have written before that I think there should indeed be zero tolerance shown to those who download images of children being abused. The likes of Chris Langham deserve, in my view, everything they get. But that's based on protecting children. The images downloaded by paedophiles are taken from a child being abused, and the law should do everything possible...
Thos of us who have highlighted some of the views of Ken Livingstone’s friend, Sheikh Yusuf al-Qaradawi, are often told we are distorting what he says, or taking the words out of context. So this review in Democratiya by Dave Rich and Mark Gardner of a new translation of al-Qaradawi’s book Fatawa on Palestine is essential reading. It considers his words, in his official translation. As they write:
It is a book that promises a battle 'between the collective body of Muslims and the collective body of Jews i.e. all Muslims and all Jews' (p.77), which will hasten the end of days for mankind. This is no political analysis of the Israel/Palestine conflict, or even a faith-based lament for the Palestinian people; it is a passionate apocalyptic vision of division, war and final triumph.
Do read the whole review, because it is essential to...
It's difficult to know what's more awful about this article: the headline (which is, of course, the Guardian's rather than the writer's) or the piece itself.
This is the headline:
The good Samaritan - in an SUV
Do the Guardian editors really think it's worthy of note that someone driving an SUV behaved with common humanity? Clearly they do, which says it all about the mindset at large at the paper. They really do think that people who drive SUVs are morally degenerate.
As for the piece:
Driving home from south London, I ran out of petrol on a speed bump. An enormous 4x4 rolled slowly towards me, and I prepared for verbal abuse. "You need a push into a parking space" the blonde driver noted. She squeezed past me, and I presumed she'd driven off, which is what I would have done. But she parked, helped me push my car
Oh my sweet Lord. Please forgive me for inflicting this on you, but I have to share it with someone: Andrea Bocelli and Anna Netrebko at the Classical Brits.
Bocelli - essentially a glorified pub singer with fantastic marketing - sounds as if someone is tightening his throat with string and he's gasping for breath, while Netrebko seems to be trying to show that she, too, can do shrieking rather than singing - and that she is as capable as anyone else at ignoring the conductor's tempo.