Subscribe to The Spectator

Friday 10 February 2012

Latest issue

Buy the current issue

Jobs at Telegraph

Tears, idle tears

Monday, 8th February 2010

There is no doubt in my mind that if I were to appear on television today, or indeed on any day, and I was asked about Imogen I would cry. I would not be able to help myself. Imogen was our second daughter, who was born very prematurely in 1984 and died in the special care baby unit five weeks later. Gordon Brown’s daughter was also born prematurely and died in special care. His son Fraser has cystic fibrosis, which is not necessarily fatal nowadays but can be and in any case is a draining and debilitating condition for the child and for the parents.
 
David Cameron’s severely handicapped child, his firstborn Ivan, also died recently.

There are times and places for discussion of these things. I wrote a book about our experience, not for money or sympathy but because I was asked to do it so that the many thousands of people who have similar experiences might be helped by reading that they were not alone, in all the physical and emotional senses. And so indeed it proved. I was dubious about publishing it but I was wrong. My file has hundreds of letters, some of them very long and all of them heartfelt, from people whose infants and young children died and who suffered from bewilderment, grief, distress, and many other emotions and experiences with which they struggled and who were relieved to find that someone else had felt similarly. ‘I was angry with the doctors who were only trying to help us.’ ‘I lay down on the grass above my baby’s grave because I wanted to cradle her. I have never been able to tell anyone until now.’

‘I thought I was going mad until I read that you had thought the same.’

After all the struggle, and when time was running out, we had a healthy  daughter, not a replacement for Imogen but our third child and I also have a wonderful file of letters from women who too gave birth successfully after earlier distress.

David Cameron spoke movingly about Ivan, the Browns have done so in several contexts about Jennifer and the entire House of Commons set aside differences to embrace them both in moving tributes and understanding.. That was all as it should be.

But - and it is a very big but – in interviews about politics and nothing but politics and in the run-up to a General Election, Brown and Cameron, and any others who may have suffered similarly, have a clear duty to make it crystal clear to every interviewer that the subject is politics and politics only and that  questions about personal grief and loss and the deaths of children are out of bounds and will be ignored, even when the NHS is being discussed.

Because neither man could help weeping and who would expect them to? Weeping when reminded of the death of one’s child is not something one can control.

The deaths of those we love help to shape and define us. They become as much a part of who we are, what we believe and think and feel, how we change and grow, as the lives of our living family and friends – more so, probably. I know that the deaths of those I have loved deeply are woven into the fabric of my being and can never be unravelled unless you unravel me. That is surely as it should be.

But these griefs are not for casual airing and they are emphatically not, not ever, to be used along with the subsequent tears, for party political purposes, not to make others feel sympathy or, heave forbid, that they are being emotionally blackmailed into giving their vote.

Of course, you will respond, this was not Brown’s intention when he shed tears for his dead child on television. No, I am sure it was not. But it happened and he might have known that it would and the only way he, and David Cameron, can be certain that he can never be accused of using that death for the wrong ends is to ensure that the subject is not aired in the course of public comments or interviews during the next few months.
 


Blogs: Alex Massie | Martin Bright | Rod Liddle | Melanie Phillips | Coffee House | Faith Based

Actions: Print this article  |  Email to a friend  |  Permalink   |   Comments (6)

Post this entry to:   del.icio.us | Digg | Newsvine | NowPublic | Reddit

Comments Post comment

Bunnykins

February 8th, 2010 5:16pm Report this comment

Thank you Susan for a very heartfelt and measured post. It is unfortunate that Gordon Brown was unintentionally (or otherwise) steered down that path. From what I hear, most people were unimpressed by this outpouring of such a personal nature which was an unnecessary departure to the matter in hand. If it were an accidental departure, could it not have been edited? G0d Forbid there was a more cynical reason for its inclusion.

James Delingpole

February 9th, 2010 10:06am Report this comment

Thank you, Susan. Brilliant post.

SUSAN HILL

February 15th, 2010 9:11am Report this comment

And yet Brown did it again with Piers Morgan. Disgusted does not begin to cover it.

Ian C

February 15th, 2010 6:50pm Report this comment

Agree with you Susan - and as Martin Bright says he now has to live with himself. Good luck to him with that. It will ensure that we, the rest of the country, will not have to for much longer.

martin

February 16th, 2010 1:40pm Report this comment

"Of course, you will respond, this was not Brown’s intention when he shed tears for his dead child on television. No, I am sure it was not."
No I wouldnt respond any such thing, I would bet good money that Brown knew that question was coming before he ever walked into the studio. It is S.O.P for politicians to be informed of the questions to expect on air, and to believe a wholly supportive interviewer like Piers Morgan would spring that one unexpectedly? No chance.
It was all stage-managed. That they weren't crocodile tears, Ok just about, but he fine well knew it was coming and walked into it with his eye open.

hadrian

February 19th, 2010 10:57pm Report this comment

Whatever sympathy one had for him before this sorry episode, with his 'My children are not political props.' assertion, well, that sympathy has totally evaporated. The man is shown to be so desperate he does a blatant U-turn. Hypocritical and repugnant.

Post comment

Back to top

About Susan Hill
Cartoons

Search this blog

Susan Hill's blog archive

sponsored links

Spectator recommends

Spectator classifieds

THE PRESENT FINDER

1,700 Unusual Christmas Presents Request Catalogue 01935 815 195 Quote SPEC10 for 10% discount www.presentfinder.co.uk

OLIVE BRANCH FLORISTS

Pimilco based Florist with online ordering Web: www.olivebranch.net Tel: 020 7630 1868 Fax: 020 7233 8844

RUFFS Bespoke Signet rings

62 Shore Road, Warsash, Southampton, SO31 9FT Telephone: 01489 578867 Web site: www.ruffs.co.uk