‘I’ve always wanted to do a wedding,’ the mother said. ‘And as
there’s only Becky I really hope she and Sam will get engaged soon.’
Sam is a junior doctor. He and Becky met at university and have had a fairly ongoing relationship for six years – ‘fairly’ meaning there has been some of the usual blowing hot and cold and Sam has been working too hard this year to see much of her. Becky’s parents are pushing her into Sam’s arms and up the aisle not so much because they like him and he is a nice young man – they do and he is, but because they have always had social aspirations and a doctor in the family represents quite a few ladder-rungs to them. That sounds appallingly patronising and snobbish but it is no more than the plain truth and the fact that Becky’s mother has always wanted to ‘do a wedding’ is only part of the whole scheme. But she has and she has been saving for, oh, ever, and getting Bridal magazines secretly for two years. All very harmless you may think. Is it?
Whether Sam and Becky love one another enough to commit to spending the rest of their lives together, ‘forsaking all other’ I do not know. I do know that neither has had another serious relationship. But given time and growing up they would be perfectly capable of reaching their own decision. They just need to be left alone to do it, and they are not being left alone. There is pressure, sometimes subtle, usually not, from Becky’s parents – the Bridal magazines are not always well hidden. Sam’s family are apparently far less keen, not because they don`t like Becky – they probably do, but because he is very young, has a lot of time and energy-consuming years ahead of him making his way as a surgeon, and because they worry that he has somehow slipped into a sort of easy groove along which he will glide without much thought, to marriage. They feel that he ought to see something of the world and of other girls too. They may or may not be right. Whether they also feel that Sam is marrying beneath him or could do better for himself I don`t know – they’re a medical family, both parents consultants and Dad has a Knighthood, two other children in the profession, well-heeled. Those snobbish attitudes are not as common as they used to be but they are not rare either.
The worst-case scenario is that Sam and Becky for want of the strength or cleverness to resist, will allow themselves to be pushed by her parents into a marriage they think they want for themselves but will discover, a year or five down the line, was not actually their own choice. They will be unhappy, they will separate and then divorce - hopefully before they have any children.
Well, this is a common enough story and unremarkable save for the fact that at least in certain respects I fear it might be the story of Prince William and his long term girlfriend Kate Middleton. Every week I see the headline or sub-line in a social gossip magazine or on a tabloid newspaper– even occasionally a broadsheet, shame on them, which tells me that these two are secretly engaged, that an announcement is imminent, the wedding is pencilled in for 2011, it will /won’t be Westminster Abbey/St Paul’s/Scotland. I am glad that I have not held my breath for the last few years. I certainly don`t plan to start holding it now. Are they secretly engaged? I have no idea Will they marry, in 2011 or any other year ? No idea about that, either. Do I care? No. Well, no, except that I think it is quite wrong of the media to add any pressure to what might – or might not – already be pressure of the family sort. I heard from someone very much ‘in the know’ that Mrs Middleton is desperate for her daughter to marry and be a Princess. I heard from someone else in a different ‘know’ that Prince Charles is extremely worried about the relationship and anxious that William should not marry this girl. Do either of these know-alls really know anything? No idea again and none of it matters a two penny damn either, though I do wonder if the British public would be happy about the amount of public money that would have to be spent on this putative royal wedding in these straitened times. Still, then again, there’s always a few as loves a jamboree.
My point is not personal. It is that here are two young people, like Becky and Sam, in a long-term relationship, with neither having apparently had any other serious ones before, and who are being pressurised non-stop by the media to name the day. They may, they may not but it will be very hard for them to go on resisting if they stay together at all, and that does not bode well, in a family whose recent marital track record is so poor.
The royal life is a miserable one, and aspiring to it is bizarre in any human being – save for one proviso, which is that the aspirant loves the royal personage so much that the way of life is shouldered gladly not for itself, but as a sine qua none of the relationship.
A seemingly nice, ordinary young Swedish man, Daniel Westerling, recently married Crown Princess Victoria of Sweden in the Wedding of the Millennium, and became Prince (though not Crown Prince – the Swedish are quite feminist) Daniel. Two things struck me when watching some of the wedding footage – that they were both overwhelmingly happy and that this was a love match to end all love matches. They too have known one another for some years but whether there was any pressure on them to marry from the Swedish media I do not know. It would have been irrelevant because they looked so happy on their wedding day that it was clear they would have eloped and become non-royals in a second rather than lose one another, if they had not been given the family blessing. They seem very well able to withstand any sort of outside pressure and their joy was a joy to behold.
Marriage is a difficult enough relationship even between two people who love one another as much as this. Being royal and in the media spotlight for life makes succeeding at it far more difficult. I really do think that only the greatest love and determination can make it survive.
A lot of people have responsibility to help not hinder here, whether we are talking about William and Kate or Sam and Becky. It’s easy enough - just leave them alone, do not try and organise their future lives or their weddings for them and if the weddings never take place at all, just shut up about it.
Some hope.
Blogs: Alex Massie | Martin Bright | Rod Liddle | Melanie Phillips | Coffee House | Faith Based
Actions: Print this article | Email to a friend | Permalink | Comments (11)
Post this entry to: del.icio.us | Digg | Newsvine | NowPublic | Reddit
Advertisement
1 Ignore the European Court and deport Abu Qatada tonight - Douglas Murray
2 We must be honest about honour killings - William Maxwell
3 Storm in an Indian teacup - Daniel Korski
4 Don’t let’s be beastly to the bankers - Fraser Nelson
5 Livingstone will get away with it, of course — because he's on the ‘left’ - Douglas Murray
1 Ignore the European Court and deport Abu Qatada tonight - Douglas Murray (100)
2 Don’t let’s be beastly to the bankers - Fraser Nelson (71)
3 We must be honest about honour killings - William Maxwell (62)
4 Lawson: Abolish DECC - Fraser Nelson (48)
5 Livingstone will get away with it, of course — because he's on the ‘left’ - Douglas Murray (44)
1,700 Unusual Christmas Presents Request Catalogue 01935 815 195 Quote SPEC10 for 10% discount www.presentfinder.co.uk
Pimilco based Florist with online ordering Web: www.olivebranch.net Tel: 020 7630 1868 Fax: 020 7233 8844
62 Shore Road, Warsash, Southampton, SO31 9FT Telephone: 01489 578867 Web site: www.ruffs.co.uk
Apollo Magazine | Corporate | Advertising | Privacy | Terms
Spectator, 22 Old Queen Street, London, SW1H 9HP
All Articles and Content Copyright ©2012 by The Spectator | All Rights Reserved
ajs
August 29th, 2010 5:44pm Report this commentYou lovely lady, Susan (if I may address you by your Christian name without being introduced).
In an era when marriage seems to be denigrated regularly, and includes just about everything except between humans and animals (and that won't be long, I suspect), will the ghastly media just leave all of us alone. Some hope. But - audiences/readers will get what they crave...was this the case with Greek tragedy?
SRS
August 29th, 2010 8:28pm Report this commentI agree with your thoughts on meddling and interference in these matters, Susan, even though I am the mother of an unmarried daughter and am sorely tempted, from time to time, to push and prod. It does seem to me that the pressures to marry in my own generation were not entirely negative-- I see a number of young people now who put off making any commitment for so long that taking that step becomes harder and harder. They seem to dwell solely on the 'forsaking all others' aspect, to see marriage as a closing off and not the opening of new possibilities in a new life. At any rate, this summer we in the US have had the pleasure of watching Chelsea Clinton marry with every indication that, like Princess Victoria, she and her new husband are deeply and happily in love.
Fergus Pickering
August 30th, 2010 7:19am Report this commentPeople marry for all sorts of reasons and it's not necessary to be in love to make it work. Being in love is a rather delusional state liable to sudden change, don't you find? In fact, let's face it, it's not necessary to marry at all these days to bring up a family. But divorce is obviously regrettable and serves to line the pockets of lawyers - always a bad thing. I don't think Prince William's fate has much bearing on anybody else's, and he culd hardly do worse than his father who married a vacuous woman fully intending to keep up the relationship he already had with the much less vacuous woman he preferred. Now THAT was a really immoral act (which he got away with). Why would it be snobbish of Sam's parents to suppose he could do better, particularly if he doesn't seem to have any burning ambition to marry. Though it's true that chaps often don't. They bumble along and need to be shoved up the aisle. Hasn't that been pabulum for novelists at least since Jane Austen?
Andy Carpark
August 31st, 2010 9:11am Report this commentEdge of topic, but I would give human-animal miscegenation another decade max to infiltrate the statute books, via the edict of some spurious transnational authority that no-one has had the chance to elect. Feral partnerships, anybody?
Anne Wotana Kaye 1
August 31st, 2010 11:30am Report this commentNot enough that there are now those ridiculous "marriages" between same-sex couples, but there is now the suggestion of marriages between humans and other species. One shudders at the thought of the divorce procedure between say a man and a bitch, what riches a greedy lawyer would accumulate. How about a schizophreniac marrying his/herself? The most violent disagreements, even those ending in divorce, would hardly enrich the lawyers, or would they?
Naomi Muse
August 31st, 2010 4:17pm Report this commentLovely observations, Susan. I've seen a young bride frightened off by a mother in law, who 'thought it was time to have a baby.' The bride ran off and the couple are now divorced.
Likewise an interfering father who did not let his very talented daughter find her own path, subjected her to a misery of criticism and comparison with her older brother, who was a totally different kettle of fish. She's married now but waited for years to do so, and very happy indeed. More to the point she does not now feel she has to succumb to what her father says, whereas before she did.
People need to make their own minds up in their own time. Live and let live, is a good motto.
SUSAN HILL
August 31st, 2010 7:05pm Report this commentNAOMI. Indeed. A very wise friend said to me 'We learn by our mistakes and the older I get the more I think that is the only thing we learn by.' But one does not want the mistake to be as big a one as a marriage. Just let people marry when they choose. Or not. It really has nothing to do with anyone else, least of all the media.
Vivien
August 31st, 2010 9:49pm Report this commentA lot of troubles come from easy divorce, but how awful to live previous centuries when a wife's property and money belonged to her husband and she could have been completely stuck, for ever, with someone ghastly! Sometimes widowhood was the only way out - viz "The Merry Widow", and the line in one of Oscar Wilde's plays - something like "Her hair has gone quite gold with grief".
Augustus
September 1st, 2010 3:22pm Report this commentHow about the Gretna Green marriages? Now called 'One Stop Marriages', organised in 'historic Gretna Green'. although I should imagine that all the romance of the elopement has now probably disappeared.
sarah123
September 1st, 2010 4:57pm Report this commentParents always pressurise their children into marriage, its a stage of success for them as a parent. If you married and settled children you come off in a much better light then Marge from down the street whose sons are both single and living at home...and you can hardly blame them, they've put all that work into making you the person you are - they need something out of it! And unless you're famous, then marriage seems to be the way to make your parents fantastically proud.
Private Schultz
September 2nd, 2010 12:55pm Report this comment@ sarah123
No, parents do not always pressure their children into marriage. Mine never, ever did, leaving me to develop into a happily-single 50-odd, and my brother to marry in his own time, for love, now proud parent of two lovely kids.
Back to top