Sing in the pews
Congregational singing is one side of this coin. One wonders whether Jesus and his disciples sang when they were at prayer together: by the law of averages some of them must have had reasonable voices. The other side — anathema to the evangelicals, but relevant to a Cathedral which has a long-established choir-school and an educational responsibility to the local community in music — is that of the trained choir, singing complicated music by itself. The argument against such choirs is that they exclude the unmusical; the argument in favour is that (as the 12th-century Abbot Suger put it) ‘we can only come to understand absolute beauty, which is God, through the effect of precious and beautiful things on our senses’. In this way of looking at things the better the music and the more trained the performance, the nearer we come to God, as much for the people who are listening as for those who are singing.
Why is it that music is always the first art to be used as a weapon by doctrinaire people? Are they frightened of its unique ability to express the inexpressible? Evangelicals dislike abstraction and mysticism. They seem to need everything to be explained in down-to-earth language, so no one can say that someone else is trying to exclude them. Music has the power to hint at meanings which cannot be put into words, to tear into us in a way we cannot resist. This really won’t do for those who want to root everything down into the earth. For the rest of us, keen to have experiences which are larger than ourselves, which can make our imaginations fly, upwards is the only way to go. I will take my stand with Hrabanus Maurus (d. 856): ‘Without music no discipline can be perfect, nothing can exist without it. For the world itself is composed of the harmony of sounds, and heaven itself moves according to the motions of this harmony.’ And I would add that there is no better music to conjure it up than unaccompanied Renaissance polyphony.
More articles from: Peter Phillips | this section
Post this entry to: del.icio.us | Digg | Newsvine | NowPublic | Reddit
Advertisement
Talking to my dentist, as one does, we discover a mutual enthusiasm for Radio Three’s Composer of the Week (Monday to Friday) and especially its presenter, Donald Macleod.
The TV programmes you watched as a child are like acid flashbacks.
Hänsel und Gretel
Royal Academy of Music
Jenufa
Birmingham Hippodrome
Pelléas et Mélisande
Sadler’s Wells
Changeling
15, Nationwide
Subscribe to Sky from £16 a month. Get free equipment and free broadband - Join Now. Sky HD - be amongst the first to have it - order now.
Subscribe to Sky from £16 a month. Get free equipment and free broadband - Join Now. Sky HD - be...
PORTA METRONIA, ROME Standing high on the top of one of the seven hills of Rome- the Coelian- this unique
ROME and PARIS: over 350 holiday rentals apartments listed: visit www.romanreference.com and www.parisreference.com or call +39 0648 903612.
Goldsmiths by Design Welcome to Ruffs! You have found a company of Goldsmiths that specialises in the manufacture, amongst other
Spectator Business | Apollo Magazine
Corporate | Advertising | Privacy | Terms
Spectator, 22 Old Queen Street, London, SW1H 9HP
All Articles and Content Copyright ©2008 by The Spectator | All Rights Reserved
Kent Maddock
January 31st, 2008 8:22amExcellent. As one in Sydney, on the ground as it were, this is very accurate. Biblical Fundamentalism is an excuse for purveyors of cheap fear and loathing to control people and search for their own fiefdom. The bible the read is not the usual RSV, anyway, it stands for Revised Sydney Version.
Phil Craig
January 31st, 2008 5:13pmWhat an odd article. It seems perfectly reasonable for a churchman to say that music, in itself, doesn't represent contact with God. He's not saying that music is a no-no, he's just saying that other things are more important. This writer is twisting his words to make it sound like Jensen is making music and belief mutually exclusive, which is clearly nonsense. Perhaps Peter Phillips should have actually spoken to Jensen before writing this silly piece.
Greg
February 1st, 2008 8:04amHere here. Down with Jensen, I say.
T Reeves
June 2nd, 2008 9:30amExcellent article! Spot on. Sydney Anglicans are barbarians and philistines.
Andy N
July 19th, 2008 9:44amCompletely agree with Phil Craig. Jensen doesn't have a problem with music in church, but clearly sees that there are much more important things when it comes to Christianity. As with organised religion, he doesn't like how traditions of the church is prioritized above the Word of God.
Besides, if someone wanted to have their imagination "fly" or have "sensations", you might as well take some illicit drugs. You don't need singing in church for that.
For the record Sydney Anglicans read ESV - English Standard Version. For a good few years too. So Maddock, stop making false facts.
Also the writer CLEARLY has some biased conservative views on music in church. Pentecostals can easily argue to use rock based music for exactly the same purpose.