Friday 5 December 2008

Barclays Wealth
 

The latest culture as recommended by our staff

Michael Henderson

Michael Henderson suggests


Life and Letters

Allan Massie
Wednesday, 3rd September 2008

Breaking the rules

‘The result is a minor masterpiece, so good that one can even forgive the author’s affected forays into demotic English (‘don’t’ and ‘wouldn’t’ for ‘did not’ and ‘would not’, etc.).’ Setting aside the writer’s mistake — ‘don’t’ being the contraction of “do not” rather than ‘did not’ — this sentence brought me up sharp , all the more so because it was the conclusion of Jonathan Sumption’s review in this magazine of John Guy’s book about Thomas and Margaret More; and Jonathan Sumption is not only a Spectator reviewer, but also one of our finest historians.

‘Affected forays into demotic English’ is a splendid magisterial put-down. Poor Mr Guy! Poor me too, now I think of it, for I see that in my most recent column, delivered before I had read Mr Sumption’s condemnation of ‘demotic English’ — that is, English as it is spoken - I was guilty of three such ‘affected forays’ in the first paragraph alone: one ‘hadn’t’, one ‘didn’t’ and one ‘wasn’t’. Should I blush with shame?

In my defence I might say that the style of this column is, generally, relaxed; that it doesn’t aspire to the dignity of History, as I suppose Mr Guy’s book does; that instead it is couched in conversational tones which may make the use of such contractions permissible. (And, indeed, I see that a ‘doesn’t’ has already slipped, in unconsidered fashion, into this paragraph.)

Then I might seek allies among other contributors to The Spectator. In the same issue as Mr Sumption‘s review, I am happy to find Matthew Parris and Paul Johnson both making similar ‘affected forays’ into the demotic. Mr Parris indeed does so on ten occasions in his article, while our sub has put a ‘don’t’ in its heading. As for Paul Johnson — surely an authority with whom few would argue? — he began the last paragraph of his essay with the observation: ‘But we can’t all be wise.’ How very true!

Spectator Book Club

Subscribe now

Post this entry to:   del.icio.us | Digg | Newsvine | NowPublic | Reddit

Comments

Post a comment


Your comment:*

Your name:*

Your email address:*
(We won't publish this)

*Required information

Please click the button only once - your comment will not be published immediately

The Spectator Parliamentarian Awards
Spectator Book Club
The Spectator Billabong
Related articles

Surprising literary ventures

Gary Dexter

Willy and the Killer Kipper (1981) by Jeffrey Archer

Differences and similarities

Colin Amery

West Workroom towards a new sobriety in architecture theory + practice, by Paolo Conrad-Bercah+w office (including contributions from Daniel Sherer, Pierluigi Panza and George Baird)

Humph swings

Patrick Skene Catling

Last Chorus: An Autobiographical Medley, by Humphrey Lyttleton

A rose-tinted view of the bay

Barry Unsworth

The Ancient Shore, by Shirley Hazzard and Francis Steegmuller

Dirty diggers

Justin Marozzi

The Buddha & Dr Fuhrer, by Charles Allen

Spectator recommends

Free Sky Digital Offer - Order Now

Subscribe to Sky from £16 a month. Get free equipment and free broadband - Join Now. Sky HD - be...


Spectator classifieds

ROME CENTRE

PORTA METRONIA, ROME Standing high on the top of one of the seven hills of Rome- the Coelian- this unique

City Breaks. ROME and PARIS

ROME and PARIS: over 350 holiday rentals apartments listed: visit  www.romanreference.com  and  www.parisreference.com or call +39 0648 903612.

Jewellery. RUFFS (Estd. 1904).

Goldsmiths by Design Welcome to Ruffs!  You have found a company of Goldsmiths that specialises in the manufacture, amongst other