Daniel Swift
The elegant little fighters, with their distinctive elliptical wings and purring Merlin engines, are most famous for combat during the Battle of Britain, when they held back the Luftwaffe’s attempts to destroy British air defences, and therefore arguably prevented the long-planned German land invasion of Britain. As McKinstry recounts, they served also in photo-reconaissance, and were central to the defence of Malta in the spring of 1942. They saw their first intensive combat in May 1940, over Dunkirk. Later in the war, they provided initial cover for the troop landings at D-Day, and subsequently ‘some Spitfires even delivered beer to RAF personnel, the bomb racks under the wings carrying barrels’.
The colourful story begins with the Honourable Noel Pemberton Billing, a monocle-wearing ‘right-wing politician, prolific inventor, theatrical impresario, magazine publisher and aeronautical pioneer’. Billing, who was obsessed by the threat of lesbianism infiltrating English society during the first world war, and who took out no fewer than 2,000 patents for his own inventions during his lifetime, founded the Supermarine company near Southampton in 1913. As the name suggests, Supermarine initially designed flying boats, but when in the early 1930s the RAF decided to modernise its fighter squadrons, which were composed mainly of fabric-winged biplanes, the company turned to what would be its distinctive invention.
The chief designer of the Spitfire was a shy and ‘hopelessly unpunctual’ engineer called Reginald Mitchell. Despite his irregular working habits — he ‘would often disappear in the middle of the day for a round of golf or a trip in his sailing boat’ — Mitchell was obsessed by the plane, and the Spitfire slowly emerged from his ceaseless redesigns. The plane was shown at air shows in the summer of 1936, and the Air Ministry ordered 310 of them.
Yet, as McKinstry narrates, ‘the Spitfire saga was filled with setbacks’. The factory at Southampton was too small, and too cold in the winter; Supermarine had to subcontract the building work to more than 80 other firms. By the end of the 1937, only six fuselages had been completed, and they lacked wings. By mid 1938, ‘not a single RAF squadron had been provided with any Spitfires’, and this delay had an effect upon the British entrance into the war. As McKinstry emphasises, ‘this chronic shortage of fighter planes heavily influenced Neville Chamberlain in his negotiations with Hitler’.
McKinstry places the Spitfire at the centre of the history of the second world war. But, as his subtitle suggests, this is also the history of a legend, and he goes beyond detailing the Spitfire’s invention and its combat adventures to describing its role in the popular fantasies of the second world war. The Spitfire was particularly loved, he argues, because it offered ‘the one tangible form of protection against the most frightening fear of all: the bomber’.
The indiscriminate destruction promised by bombing was a widespread fear in the 1930s, stoked by popular science-fiction novels such as H. G. Wells’s The Shape of Things to Come and S. Southwold’s The Gas War of 1940, which predicted total devastation of European cities. London had been briefly bombed during the first world war, and since then well-publicised air offensives by the Japanese in China and the Italians in Abyssinia added to the panic. The Spitfire, writes McKinstry, ‘was a source of reassurance against these nightmares’.
It was not only the English who saw the irresistible glamour of the Spitfire. German pilots who had been shot down by other English fighters, such as the Hurricane, would often claim that they had fallen victim to a Spitfire. This was a noble defeat. The Spitfire was a flying machine, but also a powerful fantasy of flight, and McKinstry’s satisfying and nostalgic study gives equal weight to both its roles.
Post this entry to: del.icio.us | Digg | Newsvine | NowPublic | Reddit
Advertisement
The Economist Book of Obituaries, by Keith Colquhoun and Ann Wroe
When does a novel stop being a novel and become a crime story? It’s often assumed that there is an unbridgeable gap between them, but that’s not necessarily so.
The Third Reich at War, 1939-1945, by Richard L. Evans
The Politics of Official Apologies, by Melissa Nobles
Just What I Always Wanted: Unwrapping the World’s Most Curious Presents, by Robin Laurance
Subscribe to Sky from £16 a month. Get free equipment and free broadband - Join Now. Sky HD - be amongst the first to have it - order now.
Subscribe to Sky from £16 a month. Get free equipment and free broadband - Join Now. Sky HD - be...
PORTA METRONIA, ROME Standing high on the top of one of the seven hills of Rome- the Coelian- this unique
ROME and PARIS: over 350 holiday rentals apartments listed: visit www.romanreference.com and www.parisreference.com or call +39 0648 903612.
Goldsmiths by Design Welcome to Ruffs! You have found a company of Goldsmiths that specialises in the manufacture, amongst other
Spectator Business | Apollo Magazine
Corporate | Advertising | Privacy | Terms
Spectator, 22 Old Queen Street, London, SW1H 9HP
All Articles and Content Copyright ©2008 by The Spectator | All Rights Reserved
Paul Corrigan - New Zealand
December 9th, 2007 7:33am'The elegant little fighters, . . . are most famous for combat during the Battle of Britain, when they held back the Luftwaffe’s attempts to destroy British air defences, and therefore arguably prevented the long-planned German land invasion of Britain.' I don't wish to comment about the aircraft. I've heard New Zealand fighter pilots say it was the finest aircraft they'd flown. But that remark appears to perpetuate the myth that the Spitfire won the Battle of Britain. Pilots flying Hurricanes inflicted most losses on the Luftwaffe during the Battle of Britain -- I believe as high as 80 per cent. Nearly two-thirds of Fighter Command squadrons engaged in the battle flew Hurricanes.
Steve Halstead
December 10th, 2007 5:39amThe Spitfire is / was a beautiful aircraft without doubt, but I want to echo Paul Corrigans comment. The Hurricane was the backbone of fighter command during the B of B. It did not have the cachet of the Spitfire but was a rugged well developed fighter in its own right and has been sadly eclipsed by its prettier sister.
Derek Sole
January 13th, 2008 10:29pmI enjoyed reading this , particularly the early political wrangling. However I was disappointed that he referred to the V1 as a rocket. it was powered by a pulse jet engine