Philip Hensher reviews How to Talk about Books
And Bayard avoids the crucial point that, in many ways, we don’t know when we have read a book at all. They are much more slippery things than he presumes. In the case of Proust, with three immensely distinct separate texts in French and three or four major translations into English, when have we actually read the thing? To the English reader, Bayard’s apparent trust in these somehow stable objects to be attained by the wavering, forgetful and lazy reader is shown up when he starts talking about a celebrated American film, Groundhog Day.
This made me pause: I didn’t remember Rita’s interest as being quite so obscure as that. In fact, what Rita actually studies is 19th-century French poetry. The company which dubbed Groundhog Day into Un jour sans fin presumably wanted to spare national feeling in thinking of a totally pointless object of study. When Bayard talks about a Japanese novel, an English novel, an Italian one, what is he actually reading?
The virtue of Bayard’s book with its seemingly jocular premise is to suggest that not- reading-but-talking is quite an important step on the long road towards the goal of actually reading the book. The weakness of it is that he doesn’t see that not-reading is, tragically, the only possible conclusion. Like Achilles and the tortoise, with every step the reader seems to halve the distance between himself and the book. Like the tortoise, a book always remains teasingly out of reach, and ultimately unreadable. You will never get to the end of Proust, though that isn’t a good reason not to make a start.
Post this entry to: del.icio.us | Digg | Newsvine | NowPublic | Reddit
Advertisement
James Robertson Justice: What’s the Bleeding Time? by James Hogg, with Robert Sellers and Howard Watson
From the Front Line: Family Letters & Diaries, 1900 to the Falklands & Afghanistan, by Hew Pike
State by State: A Panoramic Portrait of America, edited by Matt Weiland and Sean Wilsey
‘When young lips have drunk deep of the bitter waters of Hate, Suspicion and Despair, all the Love in the world will not wholly take away that knowledge.’
The Economist Book of Obituaries, by Keith Colquhoun and Ann Wroe
Subscribe to Sky from £16 a month. Get free equipment and free broadband - Join Now. Sky HD - be amongst the first to have it - order now.
Subscribe to Sky from £16 a month. Get free equipment and free broadband - Join Now. Sky HD - be...
PORTA METRONIA, ROME Standing high on the top of one of the seven hills of Rome- the Coelian- this unique
ROME and PARIS: over 350 holiday rentals apartments listed: visit www.romanreference.com and www.parisreference.com or call +39 0648 903612.
Goldsmiths by Design Welcome to Ruffs! You have found a company of Goldsmiths that specialises in the manufacture, amongst other
Spectator Business | Apollo Magazine
Corporate | Advertising | Privacy | Terms
Spectator, 22 Old Queen Street, London, SW1H 9HP
All Articles and Content Copyright ©2008 by The Spectator | All Rights Reserved
Paul Perry (Melbourne Australia)
January 11th, 2008 11:42pmAs someone who does not own a television, I regularly find myself discussing programs that I have never seen.The fact that I am never caught out, must say something about TV - or the people who watch it.
Noleen Wyatt-Jones
January 18th, 2008 11:17amHaving read Mr Henshers lengthy and compelling review of Pierre Bayard's masterpiece I found myself braving the weather in order to obtain a copy - I am sure he will be delighted to know the potency of his words. It is indeed a wonderful book and one which will grace my bookshelves for years to come and I am sure it will prompt much lively debate round the dinner table and who knows, one day I may even get around to reading it!!
Richard Wyatt-Jones
January 18th, 2008 4:21pmI Assume they all live happily ever after?