Richard Beeston on Benazir Bhutto's final appeal
According to Bhutto, there were certainly plots by al-Qa’eda terrorists to kill her but also strong suspicions that the Pakistani authorities colluded with them. Her argument is based on the failed assassination attempt against her made on 18 October last year in Karachi, where 139 people were killed. Before the attack on her home- coming procession through the city, street lights were mysteriously switched off. Pakistani security forces prevented her from using sophisticated electronic defences against car bombs. The most damning evidence is that none of the investigators ever questioned her about the attack.
‘In Pakistan things are almost never as they seem. There are always circles within circles, rarely straight lines. This was meant to look like the work of al-Qa’eda and the Taleban, and I do not doubt that they were involved. But the sophistication of the plan . . . suggested a larger conspiracy,’ she wrote. ‘Elements from within the Pakisani intelligence services had actually created the Taleban in the 1980s and certain elements sympathised with al-Qa’eda ideologically and theologically. Some had recruited or worked with it. I had identified those I suspected in my letter to the general before my return.’
Bhutto uses the incident as part of the central argument of her book, that democracy and Islam are not incompatible, that it is in the West’s interests to promote a democratic Pakistan and that the contest between Islam and the West does not need to become a clash of civilisations.
Some of the argument, particularly when she strays into the Middle East, is a little thin on detail but her central thesis is made with passion and conviction. At times it reads like an open appeal to the White House and Downing Street not to ditch democracy in Pakistan in favour of more military rule.
We will never know what sort of leader Bhutto would have made had she lived to become Pakistan’s prime minister again. But it would be good to listen to her final appeal from beyond the grave.
Richard Beeston is Foreign Editor of The Times.
, £, pp. , ISBN
Post this entry to: del.icio.us | Digg | Newsvine | NowPublic | Reddit
Advertisement
In Tearing Haste: Letters between Deborah Devonshire and Patrick Leigh Fermor, edited by Charlotte Mosley
The Casebook of Victor Frankenstein, by Peter Ackroyd
The Gate of Air: A Ghost Story, by James Buchan
True North: Travels in Arctic Europe, by Gavin Francis
Travelling Heroes: Greeks and Their Myths in the Epic Age of Homer, by Robin Lane Fox
Sky TV & free broadband packages available from £16 a month. Choose from a standard free sky box, sky plus or sky hd.
Sky TV & free broadband packages available from £16 a month. Choose from a standard free sky box, sky plus...
PORTA METRONIA, ROME Standing high on the top of one of the seven hills of Rome- the Coelian- this unique
ROME and PARIS: over 350 holiday rentals apartments listed: visit www.romanreference.com and www.parisreference.com or call +39 0648 903612.
Goldsmiths by Design Welcome to Ruffs! You have found a company of Goldsmiths that specialises in the manufacture, amongst other
Spectator Business | Apollo Magazine
Corporate | Advertising | Privacy | Terms
Spectator, 22 Old Queen Street, London, SW1H 9HP
All Articles and Content Copyright ©2008 by The Spectator | All Rights Reserved
Ganpat Ram
February 29th, 2008 2:23pmOne way the West could buy Pakistan and Islamists off cheaply is by forcing India to give up Kashmir to Pakistan. Any thoughts on this?
Scott Martin
March 3rd, 2008 7:33pmSure, conceeding to terrorist demands always makes them go away. Just ask Israeli's in towns that border Gaza.
Wajid Shamsul Hasan
March 10th, 2008 6:25pmRichard Beeston observes in his review of Benazir Bhutto’s book ‘Reconciliation’, that the most damning evidence concerning who lay behind the first attempt on Bhutto’s life is that none of the investigators ever questioned her about the attack. This, and so many other ‘loose ends’ point to a deliberate policy of culpable neglect so far as security was concerned. Whatever the motives for killing her, and whoever the plotters were will continue to be discussed for a long time. But one simple, uncomfortable, fact will not go away. Why was there so little security provided, at a time of self-evidently heightened tensions in the country? It was even explicitly denied her, when she asked for it. Of course, the same problem confronted other opposition politicians, too. No doubt it was part of a deliberately planned, low-profile strategy by Musharraf’s regime to make political campaigning so dangerous that no rallies would be held. Let alone large ones. The fewer rallies or political gatherings, the fewer changes to the status quo there would be, namely the pro- Musharraf’ parties, who held power thanks to previously-rigged elections. You might call it a policy of low-level sabotage. When you consider that Benazir Bhutto’s killer in Rawalpindi managed to get within a couple of metres of her car before shooting and detonating the explosives, it begs the question: who, exactly, was responsible for this appalling lapse in security? Whether this lack of security was deliberate or otherwise should be for the courts to decide. Those responsible should be called to justice and answer for their neglect before a jury. Due process of law must be seen to be observed, or the country cannot move forward. Whether one supported Bhutto’s politics or not is beside the point. All loyal Pakistanis of whatever political stripe, and indeed democrats the world over, will surely join me in calling for this. Just where the trail of blame leads, is for an independent judiciary to establish, or better still, a UN enquiry. It is high time to clean out the Augean stables that are the military-intelligence nexus in Pakistan. They, more than perhaps any other part of successive administrations, have had a strong negative influence on Pakistan, going back decades. Enough is enough. Yours truly Wajid Shamsul Hasan Former Pakistan High Commissioner London NW3