Matthew Parris on the new book from Damian Thompson
As I intend to dispute the entire thesis on which this little book rests, I should say at the outset that it is one of the best short contributions to an important argument I have ever read. Cleanly and crisply written, entertaining and clear, and packed with factual ammunition, Counterknowledge makes the ideal companion for any huntsman minded to go shooting down silly ideas.
And Damian Thompson bags a whole cartload of them. Idiotic 9/11 theories, religious nuttery and creationism, Da Vinci Code-style false history, and homeopathy and ‘alternative’ medicine of every sort, fall flapping to the ground: victims of Thompson’s arsenal of information, unsparing logic and clear aim. There is a chuckle on almost every page as yet another supposed ‘true fact’ is exposed as anything but.
Yet I have three serious objections: not to the wealth of truths and truth contained here, but to the theoretical structure on which Thompson hangs his study. It is central, first, to his argument that the modern world is experiencing a huge upsurge in the spread, reach and potency of intellectual quackery: and Thompson is surely right to argue that the globalisation of thought facilitated by mass-communications does allow untruth to circumnavigate the planet before the truth can get its boots on.
But it also gives wings to the remedy: rebuttal. And when beliefs could travel no faster than a stage-coach, falsehood and misconception could linger longer and reach deeper into a culture. Thompson offers no evidence for the proposition that our age is any sillier or more misinformed, or in the grip of fewer heresies against fact, than any previous age.
Nor am I persuaded — and this is my second objection — by the distinction the author seeks to draw between wrong belief which is also the ‘heterodoxy’ of its age (which he wishes to excuse) and wrongheadedness which runs counter to the knowledge and wisdom of the age. There was no good evidence for the existence of flying witches (or the efficacy of leeches) even when almost everyone believed in these things. Much religious doctrine has been a nonsense from the start.
Post this entry to: del.icio.us | Digg | Newsvine | NowPublic | Reddit
Advertisement
When does a novel stop being a novel and become a crime story? It’s often assumed that there is an unbridgeable gap between them, but that’s not necessarily so.
The Third Reich at War, 1939-1945, by Richard L. Evans
The Politics of Official Apologies, by Melissa Nobles
Just What I Always Wanted: Unwrapping the World’s Most Curious Presents, by Robin Laurance
The British in France: Visitors and Residents since the Revolution, by Peter Thorold
Subscribe to Sky from £16 a month. Get free equipment and free broadband - Join Now. Sky HD - be amongst the first to have it - order now.
Subscribe to Sky from £16 a month. Get free equipment and free broadband - Join Now. Sky HD - be...
PORTA METRONIA, ROME Standing high on the top of one of the seven hills of Rome- the Coelian- this unique
ROME and PARIS: over 350 holiday rentals apartments listed: visit www.romanreference.com and www.parisreference.com or call +39 0648 903612.
Goldsmiths by Design Welcome to Ruffs! You have found a company of Goldsmiths that specialises in the manufacture, amongst other
Spectator Business | Apollo Magazine
Corporate | Advertising | Privacy | Terms
Spectator, 22 Old Queen Street, London, SW1H 9HP
All Articles and Content Copyright ©2008 by The Spectator | All Rights Reserved
Darwin
March 27th, 2008 4:04pmHaven't read Thompson's book, but I'd say there's definitely a conspiracy within Mainstream Media (hilarious name, that) when it comes to keeping silent about Islam. Care to prove me wrong, Speccie, by publishing a full-scale, no holds barred, gloves-off, history, analysis and critique of Islam's doctrines and Mohamed's life, words and deeds? I'm waiting to test my own theory...
Mark Solomon
March 27th, 2008 7:20pmThe real flying witche of our age, that few dare to contest because they are social lepers for doing so, is the whole obsession with man-made climate change. It is both irrational, illogical, against all the evidence and promoted and 'proved' only by people who have a demonstrable interest in it, yet has become the orthodoxy no one dares question. Once you have tackled Islam, how about this one??