Made in China
Wages are very low. Chinese workers average $0.57 per-hour, 3 per cent of the average US manufacturing wage. These wages are lower, Harney says, than the earnings of UK handloom operators during the Industrial Revolution. As she writes, in her vivid way, the young women in Canton who work and live in sub-sub-standard conditions, or face the prospect of prostitution, have ‘taken up the baton in the relay race that began in 18th-century Britain with the Industrial Revolution. They were the most affordable and productive workers the world had found.’
Harney spent hours with 12 of these spunky teenagers:
There was no kitchen in room 817, no air- conditioner or heater, no dressers. Just a rusty fan and a cracked vinyl chair next to a broken mirror in the corner of the room. Their modest wardrobes took up only half a foot at the end of each bed — shirts and jeans hung from every frame. Their shoes and worldly possessions fit under their beds.
These conditions make one chuckle mordantly at recent assurances in The Times by well-known UK manufacturers that overseas workers making goods for sale here are paid the minimum wage — in China $0.57 cents per hour. They don’t mention health insurance, which few Chinese workers have, or pensions, which are almost unknown.
Indeed, the whole matter of monitoring, of which these UK household names boast, is explored minutely by Harney. Poisonous and counterfeit goods, bad enough, are not the biggest scandals. It is the diseases of China’s factory hands that might make even Scrooge wince. Owners lie, monitors skimp, ‘shadow factories’ manufacture in conditions that Wal-Mart never sees. Only six of China’s largest cities meet national standards for pure drinking water. Four of the world’s 20 most polluted cities, burning coal from the world’s most dangerous mines, are Chinese. One third of the entire population breathes pollution, from which 400,000 people die every year and the annual bill for water and air pollution is $54 billion.
And as Harney observes, ‘What happens in China doesn’t stay in China.’ Much Chinese pollution floats across to the US, along with carbon monoxide, ozone and mercury. So does the apocalyptic cargo of disease, poverty, horrible working practices and other scandals carried to our shores by those cheap goods that Marks and Spencer, Gap and H&M claim are so morally produced. The ghastly point is that Chinese workers work, live and die in conditions that Charles Dickens could not have described better than Alexandra Harney has.
Post this entry to: del.icio.us | Digg | Newsvine | NowPublic | Reddit
Advertisement
Willy and the Killer Kipper (1981) by Jeffrey Archer
West Workroom towards a new sobriety in architecture theory + practice, by Paolo Conrad-Bercah+w office (including contributions from Daniel Sherer, Pierluigi Panza and George Baird)
Last Chorus: An Autobiographical Medley, by Humphrey Lyttleton
The Ancient Shore, by Shirley Hazzard and Francis Steegmuller
The Buddha & Dr Fuhrer, by Charles Allen
Subscribe to Sky from £16 a month. Get free equipment and free broadband - Join Now. Sky HD - be amongst the first to have it - order now.
Subscribe to Sky from £16 a month. Get free equipment and free broadband - Join Now. Sky HD - be...
PORTA METRONIA, ROME Standing high on the top of one of the seven hills of Rome- the Coelian- this unique
ROME and PARIS: over 350 holiday rentals apartments listed: visit www.romanreference.com and www.parisreference.com or call +39 0648 903612.
Goldsmiths by Design Welcome to Ruffs! You have found a company of Goldsmiths that specialises in the manufacture, amongst other
Spectator Business | Apollo Magazine
Corporate | Advertising | Privacy | Terms
Spectator, 22 Old Queen Street, London, SW1H 9HP
All Articles and Content Copyright ©2008 by The Spectator | All Rights Reserved
KMcC
July 10th, 2008 11:08amI haven't read this book, but I've read enough about the subject of sweatshops, industrialisation and the economics of growth and development to offer a few thoughts.
First, sweatshops are indeed not nice places to work, but poor people in poor countries make the rational choice to work in them because a job in a sweatshop sewing clothes or making toys is better than the alternatives. These alternatives may be unpaid labour in subsistence agriculture; prostitution; picking over rubbish heaps. You get the picture. Sweatshops not nice; alternatives worse.
Second, I'd suggest that the process of industrialisation takes many decades less than it used to. It took Britain grim generations to move from sweatshops and early industrial activity to a service-based economy; other nations, with much more capital to utilise and more experience of earlier successes and failures to examine, will do it in less. Japan and S Korea and Taiwan all made the gruelling transition in less time than Britain and the US and Western Europe did. I expect China will do it in even less time.
Finally, it would be wrong not to buy goods made by poor people because you don't like the way they were produced. Without people willing to purchase said goods, those who manufacture them will find their progress out of poverty to take much longer.
wonderfulforhisage
July 10th, 2008 8:29pmAnd what if China's leaders are playing a long game.
Get the West thoroughly dependent on cheap Chinese imports by keeping the exchange rate ludicrously low and ten, twenty, thirty years on...the World is Their Oyster.
Game Set and Match to those that understand dynasty.
Why else would the Chinese Government be subsidising our under class.
peter adler
July 12th, 2008 6:44pmThank you KMcC! I know that Jonathan Mirsky is very knowledgeable about China and I can only assume the same of Alexandra Harney. So it is a terrible pity that they don’t realise the vital truth that KMcC raises. Furthermore, while there is of course a lot of truth in their actual description of the situation on the ground today, I can still only see it as a very selective truth, tailored for a Western audience who expect to hear how terrible things are in China. I came back from China a few months ago, after five years of living there. I have visited hundreds of factories, including many factories doing ”dirty” things like fabric dying, electroplating of metal and tanning of leather. I have seen some with appalling working conditions. But although the vast majority certainly had many faults in the working environment, which I would point out, most of them were not Dickensian. I do not deny that there are Dickensian factories out there, probably at a greater proportion than what I have seen, but I deny that they are the majority. I have also visited dozens of dormitories – foreigners’ luxury compounds they ain’t, but livable, they are. I have wandered on the streets of Dongguan, the grey city between World-record City Shenzhen and Guangzhou (Canton), which can be seen as the heart of the Pearl River Delta massive light industry regins, and is famed for consisting solely of sweatshops and dormitories. The spirit is open, the girls giggle and hold each others’ hands, and the men are not so macho or aggressive.
Why do I call Shenzhen ”World-record City”? Because no other city in World History has grown from nothing to 14 million people in a period of less than 30 years. Just to illustrate KMcC’s point.
Having been a reporter for the FT, Harney should know full well that it is exceedingly difficult to measure inflation – and therefore to compare wage levels – over longer time periods. How do you measure the inflation in the price of mobile phones over the last 200 years? According to some particular econometric yardstick, the Chinese migrant laborers may have lower wages ”than the earnings of UK handloom operators during the Industrial Revolution”– but I don’t believe that the latter had the option of talking with their friends any time, anywhere – there are something like 700 million mobile phone subscribers in China today, and counting – at a rate of approximately 5 million per month. For that matter, I don’t believe those UK handloom operators had electric lighting or tarmaced roads either.