William Leith reviews two new books on anthropology
What’s less straightforward is the fact that, when it comes to certain other characteristics, the bedroom snoopers come out better than the friends. When it comes to judging how conscientious somebody is, or how emotionally stable, or how open they are to new experiences, it’s better to snoop around someone’s bedroom for half an hour than to befriend them for years. A friend of mine, for instance, once told me that, during a certain period, he’d been having a nervous breakdown, but he’d decided not to tell anybody. And nobody knew. But I bet if he’d let people look around his bedroom they’d have known.
Sometimes, then, you can have a lot of information about a particular person but a poor idea of what they’re like, and sometimes a little bit is all you need. As Gladwell pointed out, it can be better to know less about somebody, because some information can be misleading. Knowing that somebody is a sportsman, for instance, might make you less able to interpret the books on their shelf. So snooping on people is difficult – but, as Gosling says, that’s why it’s so interesting: ‘Snooping is so fascinating because the relationship between clues and personality is imperfect.’
Here’s the problem. You can sometimes look at somebody’s bedroom or office and instantly get a whiff of what they’re really like, just as you can walk past somebody in the street and think: ‘that person is a criminal’ — and you might well be right. But can you know why you know? Can you understand the process scientifically? What I wanted from Gosling’s book was a series of concrete answers. The thing is that these answers don’t yet exist. This area of anthropology, as Gosling says, is still young. When we ‘form an impression’, what is actually happening is ‘a set of complex mental processes that have only recently been systematically investigated’.
Post this entry to: del.icio.us | Digg | Newsvine | NowPublic | Reddit
Advertisement
Willy and the Killer Kipper (1981) by Jeffrey Archer
West Workroom towards a new sobriety in architecture theory + practice, by Paolo Conrad-Bercah+w office (including contributions from Daniel Sherer, Pierluigi Panza and George Baird)
Last Chorus: An Autobiographical Medley, by Humphrey Lyttleton
The Ancient Shore, by Shirley Hazzard and Francis Steegmuller
The Buddha & Dr Fuhrer, by Charles Allen
Subscribe to Sky from £16 a month. Get free equipment and free broadband - Join Now. Sky HD - be amongst the first to have it - order now.
Subscribe to Sky from £16 a month. Get free equipment and free broadband - Join Now. Sky HD - be...
PORTA METRONIA, ROME Standing high on the top of one of the seven hills of Rome- the Coelian- this unique
ROME and PARIS: over 350 holiday rentals apartments listed: visit www.romanreference.com and www.parisreference.com or call +39 0648 903612.
Goldsmiths by Design Welcome to Ruffs! You have found a company of Goldsmiths that specialises in the manufacture, amongst other
Spectator Business | Apollo Magazine
Corporate | Advertising | Privacy | Terms
Spectator, 22 Old Queen Street, London, SW1H 9HP
All Articles and Content Copyright ©2008 by The Spectator | All Rights Reserved
James Manners
July 18th, 2008 2:51amThe reference to brake cables is daft. Cars have used hydraulic brakes for over 50 years. Even looking at the state of the brake linings is no indication as they should only be changed when worn down to their safe limit. However, you could check on the car service record to see how often its brake linings have been changed and compare it to the average for the same model.