William Leith reviews two new books on anthropology
Here are two books by anthropologists — Sam Gosling, from the University of Texas, and Daniel Miller, from the University of London. Both are British. Both set out to explore one of anthropology’s central questions: what is the relationship between people and their possessions? At the start of his book, Gosling says, more or less, that if you look at people’s stuff in the right way, you can find out what makes them tick. Miller, on the other hand, is more tentative. He doesn’t want to generalise. But then, the people he studies seem much weirder than the people Gosling studies. Or maybe Miller is weirder than Gosling. As with all anthropological matters, it’s hard to know for sure.
Both Gosling and Miller know that the relationship between people and their stuff is a complex one. You can’t walk into somebody’s house and see a tennis racquet and know for sure that the person in question plays tennis. They might just want to give the impression they play tennis, in an effort to fool people. Or someone might have left a tennis racquet at their house. As Gosling points out, if you jump to conclusions, you might easily jump to the wrong ones. A bible in somebody’s office might be a sign of a religious person. On the other hand, some companies give a bible to every employee.
So jumping to conclusions is wrong, right? Not necessarily. Gosling once devised an experiment about jumping to conclusions. Malcolm Gladwell described it in his book Blink, which is the best book ever written on jumping to conclusions. In the experiment, Gosling asked people to answer certain questions about their friends. Then he asked some strangers to snoop around the bedrooms of the same people. The results were fascinating. If you’re somebody’s friend, you will have a pretty accurate idea of how extrovert they are, and also how agreeable they are. That sounds fairly straightforward, doesn’t it?
Post this entry to: del.icio.us | Digg | Newsvine | NowPublic | Reddit
Advertisement
Breaking the rules
Fifty years ago, Alan Sillitoe’s first novel, Saturday Night and Sunday Morning, changed the history of English fiction. Richard Bradford explains how.
In Tearing Haste: Letters between Deborah Devonshire and Patrick Leigh Fermor, edited by Charlotte Mosley
The Casebook of Victor Frankenstein, by Peter Ackroyd
The Gate of Air: A Ghost Story, by James Buchan
Sky TV & free broadband packages available from £16 a month. Choose from a standard free sky box, sky plus or sky hd.
Sky TV & free broadband packages available from £16 a month. Choose from a standard free sky box, sky plus...
PORTA METRONIA, ROME Standing high on the top of one of the seven hills of Rome- the Coelian- this unique
ROME and PARIS: over 350 holiday rentals apartments listed: visit www.romanreference.com and www.parisreference.com or call +39 0648 903612.
Goldsmiths by Design Welcome to Ruffs! You have found a company of Goldsmiths that specialises in the manufacture, amongst other
Spectator Business | Apollo Magazine
Corporate | Advertising | Privacy | Terms
Spectator, 22 Old Queen Street, London, SW1H 9HP
All Articles and Content Copyright ©2008 by The Spectator | All Rights Reserved
James Manners
July 18th, 2008 2:51amThe reference to brake cables is daft. Cars have used hydraulic brakes for over 50 years. Even looking at the state of the brake linings is no indication as they should only be changed when worn down to their safe limit. However, you could check on the car service record to see how often its brake linings have been changed and compare it to the average for the same model.