Who are housebuilders trying to fool?
If Britain’s housebuilders really want to sell more homes, they ought to slash their prices rather than lobby the government for packages like last week’s ill-conceived attempt to boost the property market. That’s what the rest of us have done, but while prices of all other houses have plunged, new homes have still been selling for more than they did a year ago.
When the Halifax announced that the fall in house prices had reached double digits in the year to July, the figure that failed to catch the headlines was that new homes had gone up by 1.1 per cent over the previous year. Are we really to believe that new-build is the oasis in the housing market desert — or are the builders playing tricks?
There is indeed sleight of hand by the housebuilders. Though reluctant to cut their prices, they are actively offering other incentives, from waiving the need for mortgage deposits to paying buyers’ legal and survey fees and settling their stamp duty bills — a liability that they largely transferred to the government last week, thanks to their special pleading. Indeed, so successful was their lobbying — even if they criticised the package as insufficient — that the builders who have been giving five-year interest-free loans for a quarter of the purchase price got the government to chip in to that too. So, rather like car manufacturers that offer cashbacks to people buying their vehicles, housebuilders such as Crest Nicholson and Taylor Wimpey have a galaxy of incentives so long as buyers agree a high price.
More articles from: Richard Northedge | this section
Post this entry to: del.icio.us | Digg | Newsvine | NowPublic | Reddit
Advertisement
Ingots are just another commodity
At last, a fine statue of Brian Clough — but still not even a plaque for Jesse Boot
Jonathan Ruffer argues that state bail-outs in response to the credit crunch could lead to yet another massive shock: a widespread collapse of currencies, and a new inflation
A confusing guide to greener eating
Edinburgh is an undemonstrative city, says Bill Jamieson, but its financial community has been mortified by the loss of two banks that have guarded its wealth for centuries
Ross Clark says speculators and fraudsters saw easy money in buying city-centre flats with borrowed money — but investors and lenders now face huge losses as prices crash
Matthew Lynn says Britain’s largest building society prospered by refusing to follow fashion — while its bolder, greedier rivals have all gone bust or been taken over
Leading hedge-fund manager Paul Marshall says Rowan Williams was wrong to scapegoat share traders
Subscribe to Sky from £16 a month. Get free equipment and free broadband - Join Now. Sky HD - be amongst the first to have it - order now.
Subscribe to Sky from £16 a month. Get free equipment and free broadband - Join Now. Sky HD - be...
PORTA METRONIA, ROME Standing high on the top of one of the seven hills of Rome- the Coelian- this unique
ROME and PARIS: over 350 holiday rentals apartments listed: visit www.romanreference.com and www.parisreference.com or call +39 0648 903612.
Goldsmiths by Design Welcome to Ruffs! You have found a company of Goldsmiths that specialises in the manufacture, amongst other
Spectator Business | Apollo Magazine
Corporate | Advertising | Privacy | Terms
Spectator, 22 Old Queen Street, London, SW1H 9HP
All Articles and Content Copyright ©2008 by The Spectator | All Rights Reserved
Mike A
September 12th, 2008 12:18pmThe most sensible article I have seen so far - so why are Brown and Darling not saying the same to the Builders asking for Taxpayers money-cut the prices.
Mike A
September 12th, 2008 12:18pmThe most sensible article I have seen so far - so why are Brown and Darling not saying the same to the Builders asking for Taxpayers money-cut the prices.
Mike A
September 12th, 2008 12:18pmThe most sensible article I have seen so far - so why are Brown and Darling not saying the same to the Builders asking for Taxpayers money-cut the prices.
Mike A
September 12th, 2008 12:18pmThe most sensible article I have seen so far - so why are Brown and Darling not saying the same to the Builders asking for Taxpayers money-cut the prices.
Mike A
September 12th, 2008 12:18pmThe most sensible article I have seen so far - so why are Brown and Darling not saying the same to the Builders asking for Taxpayers money-cut the prices.
Mike A
September 12th, 2008 12:18pmThe most sensible article I have seen so far - so why are Brown and Darling not saying the same to the Builders asking for Taxpayers money-cut the prices.
Mike A
September 12th, 2008 12:18pmThe most sensible article I have seen so far - so why are Brown and Darling not saying the same to the Builders asking for Taxpayers money-cut the prices.
Mike D
September 15th, 2008 9:34amIf the recession continues other factors will come into play. Building contracts dry up. Builders break ranks as they chase scarce contracts. The bloated margins of the parties in the production chain are cut. The cost of building reduces in real terms.
Consensus seems to be that the recession will continue. The UK economy is rip off land bar none - it staggers visitors to see the prices charged for anything with a labour or service component, the overindulged workforce and the completely unnecessary jobs. There is plenty of room for price cutting. With low cost Asia and Eastern Europe having a greater influence on the West, it is going to have to be real term price cutting across the economic board. Or sink.
Ten years of debt funded boom has resulted in a generation that has never lived through periods of recession where the market value of new property becomes less than its replacement cost. Probably before the UK reaches this point government will reflate with inflation to follow. Timing is thus likely to be the key issue.
Matt
September 15th, 2008 12:55pmMaybe the reason that builders will not lower prices is because a lower price will become the new benchmark for all the other properties in the street. This could cause a cascading bid down of the nearbye properties.
Toolmaker
October 14th, 2008 6:03pm1.) Because CEOs and directors of house builders always need more inputs & outputs to get their marginal returns, they only build one half to three quarters of needed housing, they dont want fill all the housing needs and use up all their inputs and they want to increase the rarity value of housing as a commodity! If they really wanted to build enoth houses they have enoth financial influence to get local governments to allocate land!
Therefore in order to save capitalism one or two large house builders will have to be nationalised!
Toolmaker
October 14th, 2008 6:05pmI didnt post these comments above called Mike A, im the real Mike A aka Toolmaker