Martin Jacomb assesses the extent of the damage to the banking system so far — and the effectiveness of responses by central banks, regulators and lawmakers
Will it be short and sharp, or drawn out and deep, with lasting damage? A recession is upon us, but no one knows its path. Its course and its force are, like Hurricane Gustav’s, unpredictable.
It is already more than a year since it all started. Banks everywhere have made enormous losses; some, even important ones such as Lehman Brothers in New York, have collapsed, and more may do so. They are being blamed for the catastrophe. But it is not as simple as that.
A decade of the miraculous combination of low interest rates and low inflation inevitably led to banks lending ever higher volumes to riskier borrowers. Conditions in credit markets awash with easy money were made to seem even more benign with the growth of securitisation. This is the process whereby banks bundle up a package of loans, such as residential mortgages, and then slice these up into tranches of differing quality, so that these tranches can then be sold to investors outside the banking system. Banks were thus enabled to expand the volume of their lending which made up for the lower returns they were able to earn in an era of low interest rates. It also supposedly diversified risk. Everyone thought that this made the banking system safer; even Alan Greenspan made pronouncements to this effect.
However, when the underlying lending started to go bad (in the US mortgage market) many of these securitised loans turned out not to have been effectively disposed of but to have remained the responsibility of the banks which originated them. Many senior managers, paid big salaries and bonuses based on the volume of business and ‘apparent’ profitability, had not grasped the reality.
More articles from: Martin Jacomb | this section
Post this entry to: del.icio.us | Digg | Newsvine | NowPublic | Reddit
Advertisement
At last, a fine statue of Brian Clough — but still not even a plaque for Jesse Boot
Jonathan Ruffer argues that state bail-outs in response to the credit crunch could lead to yet another massive shock: a widespread collapse of currencies, and a new inflation
Ingots are just another commodity
Judi Bevan meets Sir John Parker, who chairs National Grid and the Court of the Bank of England — and takes an optimistic view of the deepening recession
So many ways to say we’re in trouble
Neil Collins on alternative investment
Edinburgh is an undemonstrative city, says Bill Jamieson, but its financial community has been mortified by the loss of two banks that have guarded its wealth for centuries
The ticking parcel I failed to spot and the oil-price prediction I got spot on
Build your own Sky package online. Sky TV, Broadband & Talk only £17.
Subscribe to Sky from £16 a month. Get free equipment and free broadband - Join Now. Sky HD - be amongst the first to have it - order now.
Build your own Sky package online. Sky TV, Broadband & Talk only £17.
Subscribe to Sky from £16 a month. Get free equipment and free broadband - Join Now. Sky HD - be...
PORTA METRONIA, ROME Standing high on the top of one of the seven hills of Rome- the Coelian- this unique
ROME and PARIS: over 350 holiday rentals apartments listed: visit www.romanreference.com and www.parisreference.com or call +39 0648 903612.
Goldsmiths by Design Welcome to Ruffs! You have found a company of Goldsmiths that specialises in the manufacture, amongst other
Spectator Business | Apollo Magazine
Corporate | Advertising | Privacy | Terms
Spectator, 22 Old Queen Street, London, SW1H 9HP
All Articles and Content Copyright ©2008 by The Spectator | All Rights Reserved
Andrew Barnes
September 18th, 2008 6:30pmNot sure about the public sector Panacea. If the market believes that the govt will step in only when the shareholders have been decimated and then finish the job by killing off the equity the short sellers have no incentive to stay away and the shareholders have no incentive to keep their funds in the company. The govt should fast track takeovers/mergers with some minimal special regulatory caveats. This would have the benefit of supporting the businesses without costing the tax payer, and seeing off the so-called speculators.