The death of the golden share
‘A triumph for the European Commission’ (as USA Today chose to describe it) is not something usually to be celebrated here. But yesterday’s finding by the European Court of Justice against Germany’s ‘VW law’ – protecting Volkswagen against takeover via a blocking minority vote held by the state – really does look like a blow for greater dynamism, industrial synergy, and efficient use of capital throughout Europe.
In Britain, the golden share was used to allow the government a continuing hand in the destiny of privatized businesses – but this ruling seems to mean that the device has finally had its day. Similar mechanisms protecting German and Portuguese energy companies, Telecom Italia and a variety of businesses in Hungary and Poland are now in competition commissioner Charlie McCreevy’s sights. Rulings have already been made against the Dutch government blocking powers in relation to postal and telecoms services. The French will now have to watch their step with EADS, the aerospace group, and Thales in the defence sector. Some 23 British entities, including Royal Mail, British Energy, which runs our nuclear power stations, and the Rosyth and Devonport naval dockyards, still have golden share arrangements, but can now expect to forfeit them if challenged.
More articles from: Martin Vander Weyer | this section
Post this entry to: del.icio.us | Digg | Newsvine | NowPublic | Reddit
Advertisement
A fatal crash for Porsche and Volkswagen?
Matthew LynnMatthew Lynn unravels the three-generation feud behind the crisis that has overtaken two of the mightiest names in German car-making and threatens to ruin both of them
New wine in old bottles
Lucinda BaringLucinda Baring meets Simon Berry, chairman of a 200-year-old company that’s more modern than it looks
The plotters mean business. But the Gordonator will survive
Matthew d'AnconaIn a disastrous week for the PM, Matthew d’Ancona reveals the plot to mount a leadership challenge after the June elections. But Brown is absolutely determined to cling to power; and Labour has shabby psychological reasons for keeping him where he is
Can mercenaries defeat the Somali pirates?
Matthew LynnMatthew Lynn says private armies who made money in Iraq have spotted a promising new market: protecting merchant ships in pirate-infested waters off lawless Somalia
No time to relax for BA’s fighter pilot
Judi BevanBritish Airways staff have sometimes been accused of ‘working without enthusiasm’, says Judi Bevan — but you certainly couldn’t say that of chief executive Willie Walsh
Winter drifts
Ursula BuchanWhat is it with snowdrops? Why do people make so much fuss about them, when they are so small and relatively insignificant?
Latest blog posts
sponsored links
BIG SAND STEEL BAND
IF YOU ARE PLANNING A CHAMPAGNE RECEPTION and looking for some light entertainment, you can now hire London's busiest steel
BOSC LEBAT, Tarn et Garonne.
BOSC LEBAT, SW France. Only 45 minutes from Toulouse Airport with daily flights from most provincial airports avoiding the horrors
ROME CENTRE
PORTA METRONIA, ROME Standing high on the top of one of the seven hills of Rome- the Coelian- this unique
Spectator Business | Apollo Magazine
Corporate | Advertising | Privacy | Terms
Spectator, 22 Old Queen Street, London, SW1H 9HP
All Articles and Content Copyright ©2008 by The Spectator | All Rights Reserved
David Lindsay
October 24th, 2007 5:01pmAnyone still disputing that the "free" market is utterly unconservative, or that the EU and globalisation are but one threat to national self-government? "Of these three strands of golden-share logic – security, protectionism, patriotic sentiment – the last two really have to be set aside in a globalised economy." Priceless.
Max Kaye
October 24th, 2007 6:58pmDavid Linsay, You obviously have misunderstood the meaning of the word conservative.
David Lindsay
October 25th, 2007 10:12amWell "patriotic sentiment" seems pretty central to it, wouldn't you say? Do you believe in the conservation or restoration of such good things as national self-government (the only basis for international co-operation, and including the United Kingdom as greater than the sum of its parts), local variation, historical consciousness, family life, the whole Biblical and Classical patrimony of the West, agriculture, manufacturing, small business, close-knit communities, law and order, civil liberties, academic standards, all forms of art, mass political participation within a constitutional framework, and respect for the absolute sanctity of each individual human life from the point of fertilisation to the point of natural death? If so, then you cannot possibly beleive in "free" market capitalism, which corrodes each and all of them to nought, both directly and by driving despairing millions into the arms of equally corrosive Jacobinism, Marxism, anarchism or Fascism. If you believe in the "free" market, then you are not a conservative. What, exactly, does the "free" market conserve?