Home > The Magazine > Business

Thursday 4 December 2008

Dare to dream and make your ultimate trip a reality

The latest culture as recommended by our staff

Michael Henderson

Michael Henderson suggests

Email registration

Free weekly email update

Great products and special offers for Spectator readers

Click here for great value events

Click here for exclusive articles, offers, tasting notes and discussion

Are markets becoming part of the problem?

Martin Vander Weyer

Wednesday, 9th January 2008

Martin Vander Weyer wonders whether 'City spivs' are responsible for the current economic turbulence.

I blinked, and decided to press home my killer question. Were we all in this unfortunate state, I asked, because of the stupidity of politicians and the feeblemindedness of central bankers, or the folly of over-borrowed homebuyers and consumers on both sides of the Atlantic, or the unalterable tide of long-term economic cycles, or the whims of 21st century weather and harvests. Or was it down to the action of what I undiplomatically (but deliberately, to get a rise) called ‘City spivs’?

Any complete answer to that question would of course seek to attribute blame judiciously between all the factors: in short, house prices always fall after a long rise, people always borrow more than is good for them if offered attractive credit, bankers always lend more than is wise when the going looks good, politicians allow all that to happen because it creates the feel-good factor that gets them re-elected, and Alan Greenspan of the Federal Reserve should take a slice of the blame for making money so cheap in the first place. But what I was aiming at with the barb at the end of my question was this: I have a nagging feeling, this time round, that the damage done by all the other factors in the economic equation is being magnified by the actions of traders and investors in a way which has never really happened before.

Markets are generally good things: they squirt capital in the directions that it is most needed; they allow real-world operators to protect themselves against financial risk; they are the self-lubricating mechanism without which the wheels of globalization could not spin. But they also stand accused, nowadays, of becoming too sophisticated and complex for their own or anyone else’s good.

Previous page 1 | 2 | 3 Next page

More articles from: Martin Vander Weyer | this section

Print this article | Email to a friend | Permalink | Comment

Post this entry to: del.icio.us | Digg | Newsvine | NowPublic | Reddit

City Life

Robert Beaumont

At last, a fine statue of Brian Clough — but still not even a plaque for Jesse Boot

The global currency crisis is still to come

Jonathan Ruffer

Jonathan Ruffer argues that state bail-outs in response to the credit crunch could lead to yet another massive shock: a widespread collapse of currencies, and a new inflation

Is gold still a safe haven?

Matthew Lynn

Ingots are just another commodity

Boom and bust

Richard Northedge

So many ways to say we’re in trouble

Brown has come full circle since 1988

Tom Bower

Tom Bower, the Prime Minister’s biographer, says that Gordon’s reinvention as the socialist who can save capitalism is just the latest in a series of convenient masks he has donned

To muzzle the short-seller is to muzzle free speech

Patrick Macaskie

The market needs speculators who are willing to challenge the big battalions, says Patrick Macaskie. Don’t believe the hype: short-sellers were not the villains of this financial crisis

The unravelling of the great buy-to-let scam

Ross Clark

Ross Clark says speculators and fraudsters saw easy money in buying city-centre flats with borrowed money — but investors and lenders now face huge losses as prices crash