Half a house is hardly worth having
Ross Clark on shared equity schemes
I suspect most first-time buyers will be able to work this out for themselves. The government’s previous attempts to encourage social-housing tenants into shared-equity schemes have not proved a huge success. In 2005, it introduced the ‘Social Homebuy’ scheme designed to entice tenants to buy a stake in their homes. By last November only 88 had chosen to do so. There are good reasons why the take-up is low. Under shared-equity schemes, tenants are invited to buy a share in their home of typically between 30 and 70 per cent. The remaining share they continue to rent from their housing association, or in a few cases the local authority. However, they are obliged to stump up 100 per cent of the maintenance costs for the property.
Not only that, selling a share in a shared-equity home is not a straightforward business. You can’t simply place your shared-equity home on the market through an estate agent. Most schemes oblige a vendor to give the housing association the right to sell your share to another of its customers, at a price set by a valuer recommended by the housing association. Only if the housing association fails, usually within eight weeks, to find a customer willing to buy your share may you offer it on the open market.
In a falling market, the prospects for selling shared-equity properties are not good. Shared-equity housing made its first appearance during the 1980s boom, but rapidly fell out of popularity when prices fell and first-time buyers could afford to buy homes outright: long after the market began to recover from its early-Nineties slump, estate agents’ windows still carried dog-eared photographs of shared-equity properties which they could not sell.
The one thing which Gordon Brown’s scheme will achieve is to annoy people who have recently bought new homes. Imagine you’ve just paid quarter of a million for a house on what you believed was going to be a cul-de-sac full of owner-occupiers. How are you going to react when Gordon buys the property next door and moves in a social-housing tenant?
Housebuilders reacted to last week’s initiative not by saying ‘thank you’, but by demanding the government spend even more millions buying up unsold new homes. It isn’t hard to understand why the housebuilders should be so anxious: Barratt last week warned it may have to lay off 5,000 staff due to a collapse in sales. But filling privately built homes with social-housing tenants will ultimately undermine the market, as private estates are transformed into council estates. If I were a housebuilder I would sooner slash my prices than accept Gordon Brown’s shilling.
More articles from: Ross Clark | this section
Post this entry to: del.icio.us | Digg | Newsvine | NowPublic | Reddit
Advertisement
The global currency crisis is still to come
Jonathan RufferJonathan Ruffer argues that state bail-outs in response to the credit crunch could lead to yet another massive shock: a widespread collapse of currencies, and a new inflation
Is gold still a safe haven?
Matthew LynnIngots are just another commodity
City Life
Robert Beaumont
At last, a fine statue of Brian Clough — but still not even a plaque for Jesse Boot
Scapegoats, hate figures and superheroes
Lucy BeresfordPsychotherapist and former banker Lucy Beresford says we’re all in denial about our guilt for the debt crisis
Chasing dragons: the Chinese army takes up art collecting
Elliot WilsonElliot Wilson profiles Poly Group, a company controlled by the Chinese military which uses arms-sales profits to buy back artworks that have been illicitly flogged off abroad
To muzzle the short-seller is to muzzle free speech
Patrick MacaskieThe market needs speculators who are willing to challenge the big battalions, says Patrick Macaskie. Don’t believe the hype: short-sellers were not the villains of this financial crisis
The unravelling of the great buy-to-let scam
Ross ClarkRoss Clark says speculators and fraudsters saw easy money in buying city-centre flats with borrowed money — but investors and lenders now face huge losses as prices crash
Welcome to the new austerity era, Mr Cameron
Fraser NelsonFraser Nelson says that the Tory leader must not be tempted by a ‘safety first’ strategy at his conference in Birmingham. The global financial crisis has transformed the political context and left an opening for the Conservatives to promise true radicalism and to be proudly bold
Latest blog posts
sponsored links
Free Sky Digital Offer - Order Now
Subscribe to Sky from £16 a month. Get free equipment and free broadband - Join Now. Sky HD - be amongst the first to have it - order now.
Free Sky Digital Offer - Order Now
Subscribe to Sky from £16 a month. Get free equipment and free broadband - Join Now. Sky HD - be...
ROME CENTRE
PORTA METRONIA, ROME Standing high on the top of one of the seven hills of Rome- the Coelian- this unique
City Breaks. ROME and PARIS
ROME and PARIS: over 350 holiday rentals apartments listed: visit www.romanreference.com and www.parisreference.com or call +39 0648 903612.
Jewellery. RUFFS (Estd. 1904).
Goldsmiths by Design Welcome to Ruffs! You have found a company of Goldsmiths that specialises in the manufacture, amongst other
Spectator Business | Apollo Magazine
Corporate | Advertising | Privacy | Terms
Spectator, 22 Old Queen Street, London, SW1H 9HP
All Articles and Content Copyright ©2008 by The Spectator | All Rights Reserved
Tony
May 27th, 2008 3:07pmThis is what shared equity is all about.
It's just the dregs the developers can't sell on and dreadful value for buyers.
But Brown thinks he can use it to divert attention away from the immigration crisis: "We need more homes, blah, blah, blah, we're buying homes for people, blah, blah, blah."
It is a key plank of social housing policy that there is "pepperpotting", that's their polite version of saying we'll let any old scumbag move in next door to you. It's all part of their drive to create "mixed communities".
Ah, community, the word so beloved of people who've never had the misfortune to live in one.