Sunday 5 July 2009

 

The latest culture as recommended by our staff

Liz Anderson

Liz Suggests


Jobs at Telegraph

Not a scandal but a textbook success

Wednesday, 18th June 2008

Ross Butler says MPs’ criticisms of the sell-off of theformer Defence Research Agency are financially naive

Yet, in reality, the QinetiQ’s story has been a textbook example of smart privatisation. It was initially spun out of what had by then become the Defence Evaluation & Research Agency in July 2001. The intention was to seek an immediate public listing, but the stock market was unfavourable and the government’s defence research budget, on which the company would clearly depend for years to come, was shrinking. Instead, it was decided to bring in a commercial investor-partner prior to seeking flotation when both company and market were ready.

The decision by MoD officials not to sit on their hands until the stock market revived has received strong criticism from the Committee, displaying remarkable naivety about commercial realities. Furthermore, the Committee has compounded the fiction that Carlyle was handed its 33.8 per cent stake for a song, guaranteeing it an exceptional return when the company eventually did come to market. In reality, a fierce auction among 40 interested parties, managed by UBS, was narrowed to 12 bids, resulting in the Carlyle Group paying £42.2 million for its stake. Most of the underbidders were seasoned players in the competitive world of private equity. I spoke to several at the time, and gathered that their highest realistic growth trajectories and future valuations were not sufficient to make the numbers work. This was no silver-platter gift.

So how could Carlyle make eight times its money when QinetiQ was floated three years later, in February 2006? At the time of the auction, with prospects for MoD work fading, QinetiQ’s managers had vague plans to diversify into fields such as healthcare. But Carlyle encouraged them not to divert from their core expertise but instead to expand into other areas of the defence market and establish joint ventures with larger firms such as Thales and BAE Systems. Carlyle also encouraged (and no doubt opened doors for) the company to launch into the world’s largest defence market, the US. During the period of Carlyle’s involvement, QinetiQ acquired four US defence companies and built up its US revenues from zero to more than $600 million.

More articles from: Ross Butler | this section

Post this entry to:   del.icio.us | Digg | Newsvine | NowPublic | Reddit

Comments

Post a comment


Your comment:*

Your name:*

Your email address:*
(We won't publish this)

*Required information

Please click the button only once - your comment will not be published immediately

Cogito Ergosum

June 19th, 2008 4:39pm

If the Governement feels it got too little from the deal, that merely matches their disdain for the scientific skills which propelled the company.

If they really valued scientists and engineers, they would have kept ownership of the company.

Peter Sugar

June 20th, 2008 2:58am

You are forgetting the large single tender government contract handed down by government for the management of the ranges, just prior to flotation.
You are also forgetting the enormous amount of land that the government allowed QinetiQ to keep and which they sold for cash to fund the purchase of those companies in the USA.
The chairman and people who profiteered did not work for that but were handed all of that on a plate. How could the valuation of the business had been so low escapes everyone and it stinks to high heaven.
The numbers look unbelievable whatever you say about context. The business of this firm today is what it always was a handout from government (UK or US) and the patents and elite scientists they inherited meant that they could not fail. The firm is not as robust as you are describing it for otherwise the share value would be much higher than at flotation prices.


Spectator Book Club

In this section

A fatal crash for Porsche and Volkswagen?

Matthew Lynn

Matthew Lynn unravels the three-generation feud behind the crisis that has overtaken two of the mightiest names in German car-making and threatens to ruin both of them

Related articles

The business of politics

David Young

As London’s mayor, Sir Alan, you’d be a mere apprentice

Health’n’safety everywhere — except in the banking system

David Young

David Young was the first minister for deregulation, 25 years ago. What we need now, he says, is stronger regulation of banks combined with a bonfire of red tape for business

City death: why so many moneymen kill themselves

Matthew Lynn

Matthew Lynn analyses the pressures that have driven a startling number of financiers and investors, hit by this and previous market crashes, to take their own lives

An idea whose time has come

Janice Warman

Janice Warman says ventures that address social problems rather than chasing profits can thrive in a recession

Any Other Business

Martin Vander Weyer

The ticking parcel I failed to spot and the oil-price prediction I got spot on

Spectator recommends

Spectator classifieds

BIG SAND STEEL BAND

IF YOU ARE PLANNING A CHAMPAGNE RECEPTION and looking for some light entertainment, you can now hire London's busiest steel

BOSC LEBAT, Tarn et Garonne.

BOSC LEBAT, SW France. Only 45 minutes from Toulouse Airport with daily flights from most provincial airports avoiding the horrors

ROME CENTRE

PORTA METRONIA, ROME Standing high on the top of one of the seven hills of Rome- the Coelian- this unique