Thursday 4 December 2008

 

The latest culture as recommended by our staff

Michael Henderson

Michael Henderson suggests


Not a scandal but a textbook success

Wednesday, 18th June 2008

Ross Butler says MPs’ criticisms of the sell-off of theformer Defence Research Agency are financially naive

That change in QinetiQ’s profile boosted its value to more than £1.3 billion at flotation, making the stake retained by the government worth £800 million. But the National Audit Office was concerned that more money might have been raised from the 2003 sale to Carlyle. The reasoning smacks of hindsight, and misses the vital point that QinetiQ found a private equity partner capable of taking the company towards success. Since the government remained the majority shareholder after the Carlyle deal, extracting the highest possible price at that stage to the exclusion of future growth considerations would have been shortsighted. As a result of Carlyle’s investment, QinetiQ is a fundamentally different business, and today’s valuation bears no relation to that of its pre-Carlyle era.

Two other findings from the National Audit Office inquiry stuck in the Committee’s throat. The first is that Carlyle reduced its offer price after being offered an ‘exclusive’ negotiating position in the 2003 auction. Whether Carlyle’s late price reduction — relating to pensions liabilities and an unsigned supplier agreement — could have been resisted is unclear, although one suspects that UBS investment bankers are not pushovers. What is clear is such hardball tactics are part of everyday life in the world of corporate deals. In attempting to second-guess decisions made in the thick of intense negotiations, the Committee has proven itself the real innocent. But the aspect of the privatisation that the MPs found hardest to stomach was the sheer amount of money made by senior management. By any normal standards, it is astonishing: the top ten managers invested £540,000 between them in 2003; it turned into £107 million at the flotation in 2006.

More articles from: Ross Butler | this section

Subscribe now

Post this entry to:   del.icio.us | Digg | Newsvine | NowPublic | Reddit

Comments

Post a comment


Your comment:*

Your name:*

Your email address:*
(We won't publish this)

*Required information

Please click the button only once - your comment will not be published immediately

Cogito Ergosum

June 19th, 2008 4:39pm

If the Governement feels it got too little from the deal, that merely matches their disdain for the scientific skills which propelled the company.

If they really valued scientists and engineers, they would have kept ownership of the company.

Peter Sugar

June 20th, 2008 2:58am

You are forgetting the large single tender government contract handed down by government for the management of the ranges, just prior to flotation.
You are also forgetting the enormous amount of land that the government allowed QinetiQ to keep and which they sold for cash to fund the purchase of those companies in the USA.
The chairman and people who profiteered did not work for that but were handed all of that on a plate. How could the valuation of the business had been so low escapes everyone and it stinks to high heaven.
The numbers look unbelievable whatever you say about context. The business of this firm today is what it always was a handout from government (UK or US) and the patents and elite scientists they inherited meant that they could not fail. The firm is not as robust as you are describing it for otherwise the share value would be much higher than at flotation prices.


The Spectator Parliamentarian Awards
Spectator Book Club
The Spectator Billabong

In this section

Is gold still a safe haven?

Matthew Lynn

Ingots are just another commodity

City Life

Robert Beaumont

At last, a fine statue of Brian Clough — but still not even a plaque for Jesse Boot

The global currency crisis is still to come

Jonathan Ruffer

Jonathan Ruffer argues that state bail-outs in response to the credit crunch could lead to yet another massive shock: a widespread collapse of currencies, and a new inflation

Related articles

Any Other Business

Martin Vander Weyer

The ticking parcel I failed to spot and the oil-price prediction I got spot on

New Deal economics: lessons from Herbert Hoover

Bill Jamieson

Bill Jamieson says calls for a Rooseveltian New Deal to stave off US recession are misinformed; it was FDR’s much-maligned predecessor who set the course for recovery

Can London be turned around like a troubled company?

Judi Bevan

Judi Bevan meets Tim Parker, the controversial private-equity player who slashed jobs and boosted value at Kwik-Fit and the AA, and is about to apply his skills at City Hall

Will the wisdom of Warren Buffett translate into German?

Matthew Lynn

Matthew Lynn wonders whether the world’s greatest investor will be able to pick winners in continental Europe the way he has for more than four decades in the US

The new ‘special relationship’: between London and New York

Michael Bloomberg

Michael Bloomberg, the Mayor of New York, unveils his new partnership with Boris, and their plans to forge a transatlantic alliance between the two greatest cities on earth to promote state-of-the-art public policy, cultural links and economic prosperity

Spectator recommends

Sky - Official Site

Build your own Sky package online. Sky TV, Broadband & Talk only £17.

Free Sky Digital Offer - Order Now

Subscribe to Sky from £16 a month. Get free equipment and free broadband - Join Now. Sky HD - be...


Spectator classifieds

ROME CENTRE

PORTA METRONIA, ROME Standing high on the top of one of the seven hills of Rome- the Coelian- this unique

City Breaks. ROME and PARIS

ROME and PARIS: over 350 holiday rentals apartments listed: visit  www.romanreference.com  and  www.parisreference.com or call +39 0648 903612.

Jewellery. RUFFS (Estd. 1904).

Goldsmiths by Design Welcome to Ruffs!  You have found a company of Goldsmiths that specialises in the manufacture, amongst other