Home > The Magazine > Cartoons

Tuesday 2 December 2008

Dare to dream and make your ultimate trip a reality

The latest culture as recommended by our staff

Michael Henderson

Michael Henderson suggests

Email registration

Free weekly email update

Great products and special offers for Spectator readers

Click here for great value events

Click here for exclusive articles, offers, tasting notes and discussion

Double trouble

Anthony Browne

Saturday, 1st October 2005

Anthony Browne on the marked increase in the number of twins and its social and economic consequences

Twins usually have a soulmate and ally for life unavailable to the rest of us, making them more confident, less depressive, less prone to suicide and, with this greater social support, less prone to crime (the Krays may have been criminals, but they were criminals with a social conscience). Families, with closer bonds between siblings, will become a more robust part of the social fabric. With stronger ties, society as a whole will become stronger.

Twins are still so rare that their very rarity arouses fascination. Try shopping with twin babies (if you don’t happen to have your own, borrow some from some exhausted parents) and you’ll spend all your time being proud to curious well-wishers. But when people start seeing double wherever they look, twins will enter the mainstream. Society will be divided down the middle between twins and singletons. When you first meet someone socially, one of the first questions will be which group they belong to. Singletons, claiming unfair disadvantages, will campaign for special affirmative action programmes.

Of course, it is conceivable that things may turn out differently. The number of twins is growing rapidly but, as my financial adviser keeps insisting he told me, past performance is no guarantee of future performance. Geneticists and perfectionist parents may have another future in store for us — domination by blond or blonde, blue-eyed Olympic-winning Einsteins. For mere mortals, that really would be something to worry about.

Anthony Browne is Europe correspondent for the Times.

Previous page 1 | 2 | 3 | 4

More articles from: Anthony Browne | this section

Print this article | Email to a friend | Permalink | Comment

Post this entry to: del.icio.us | Digg | Newsvine | NowPublic | Reddit

Highs and lows on the laughometer

Bevis Hillier

Just What I Always Wanted: Unwrapping the World’s Most Curious Presents, by Robin Laurance

Murdoch’s big secret is that he doesn’t have one

Michael Wolff

Michael Wolff reveals how he secured Rupert Murdoch’s co-operation for his biography and discovered that this media titan has no interest in posterity. He is, at heart, a city editor

I will always defend a big spender like J.M. Keynes

Nancy Dell�Olio

Nancy Dell’Olio makes an impassioned case for Keynesian economics as the necessary remedy for the global crisis. It is to the Cambridge economist that we should turn once more

How I became Bulgaria’s etiquette guru

Dylan Jones

Dylan Jones is astonished to find in Sofia that the former communist country has embraced his guide to the mores of modern life — and that not everybody looks like Borat

Rudd has lurched from indecision to phoney war

Matthew Castray

Matthew Castray looks back on the Australian Prime Minister’s first year in office and audits an administration which has reviewed much and done very little

High Life

Taki

In praise of older women

A cliché too far

Deborah Ross

Taken
15, Nationwide

Our obsession with paedophilia is more dangerous than Gary Glitter’s return

Rod Liddle

Rod Liddle says that the hunt for this foul child molester is the symptom of an unhealthy and disproportionate fixation that has spawned all sorts of absurd rules and regulations

Reading on the web is not really reading

Susan Jacoby

Susan Jacoby laments the intellectual crisis now gripping America and says that the torrent of digital infotainment is threatening basic literacy and news knowledge

It is commercial television that is really in peril

Neil Midgley

Channel 4 can’t afford Carol Vorderman and says it needs more cash for its public service remit. Nonsense, writes Neil Midgley: it is mass-market television that needs help