Liz suggests

Email registration

Free weekly email update

Great products and special offers for Spectator readers

Click here for great value reader offers and events

Click here for the latest Spectator Wine Offers

Repayment in full

Simon Baker

Thursday, 1st March 2007

The title refers to a real document. The author once received a formal letter on foolscap from Edward, itemising the author’s upbringing and demanding a $2 million repayment. Just a month before, Edward had promised to buy Bernard a car, but was unable to beat down the salesman during the inevitable argument about price. This public humiliation is the author’s only way of explaining the subsequent demand (which led to nothing, but which Bernard initially took seriously, knowing his father only too well).

Beyond observing that senility exacerbated his father’s antagonistic nature, Bernard Cooper does not attempt to explain the cause of all this. Perhaps he wished to avoid the unoriginal ‘weakness disguised as strength’ motif. However, that motif becomes irresistible. Edward, although successful, was ever-conscious of his gritty upbringing. As the author puts it, ‘Nothing infuriated my father as much as having his grammar corrected.’ He would occasionally commit solecisms such as ‘the guy don’t know’; each time he did so, ‘his eyes would widen at the realisation, and he’d bluster with fancy, ready-made phrases’. It could be that his anger was defensive, an uncivilised response from an occasionally uncivilised man (whose idea of relaxation was a tin of peanuts in front of Wheel of Fortune). But a good memoirist, unlike a bad novelist, knows that people are not two-dimensional, and the author acknowledges that Edward could be goonishly witty and remarkably non-judgmental for a man of his generation; Bernard’s homosexuality, for instance, was never criticised.

There is more than just Bernard and Edward’s relationship in this elegant memoir. Possibly the most affecting passages are those describing the premature deaths of Bernard’s three older brothers, who each succumbed to illnesses. One of them, Gary, had the unenviable distinction of once finding his father being fellated by a secretary. Edward’s response to this was so absurd as to be almost heroic: ‘He continued to talk with Gary as if nothing had happened, his hands calmly folded atop an ink blotter.’ Not a good man to know, perhaps, but a great one to read about.

Previous page 1 | 2

More articles from: Simon Baker | this section

Print this article | Email to a friend | Permalink | Comment

Post this entry to: del.icio.us | Digg | Newsvine | NowPublic | Reddit

Et tu, Scott? Bush’s press aide turns on his boss

James Forsyth

James Forsyth talks to Scott McClellan, former press secretary to the President, about his new book attacking the Bush administration, its methods and its deceits

The Law Lords are right to resist the government

Lord Lloyd of Berwick

Lord Lloyd of Berwick says that the government’s emergency legislation to overturn their lordships’ ruling on witness anonymity is part of a ‘gradual usurpation’ of our liberties

I was starstuck by David Cameron

Steven Berkoff

In the week of the Spectator Summer Party, Steven Berkoff recalls another of our celebrations at which he sought out the Tory leader and forgave his confusion of Brando and Dean

Glasgow East is Brown’s dirty little secret: a hideous, costly social experiment gone wrong

Fraser Nelson

Glasgow East symbolises — as few other places in Britain can — the fact that the problem Labour faces is not just lack of leadership but lack of mission. What is to be seen in this constituency encapsulates and dramatises Labour’s abject failures to comprehend, let alone tackle, the nature of the poverty which grips our council estates.
For all the latest on the Glasgow East by-election, visit Coffee House

Brown’s security strategy is the worst of all worlds

David Davis

It’s draconian, expensive and ineffective, says David Davis. All the evidence shows that the Prime Minister is eroding our civil liberties pointlessly