How to fill a lecture hall, and how to empty it
I recently gave a lecture, on quite a solemn subject, the connection between freedom and the ownership of property, to about 200 people, and was gratified — and surprised — at how well it was received. I think it was because I followed my own maxim, and spoke for only 25 minutes, leaving the rest of the hour for questions. It is a fact of life that any discourse, on any subject, whatever the occasion and whatever the status of the speaker, will always please if it is five minutes shorter than people expect. That is one reason why Lincoln’s Gettysburg address became so famous.
Of course what made it so unusual was that in the Victorian period orations of all kinds were expected to be long. Gladstone, on one of his Midlothian campaigns, was told by a working man that no sermon could properly be less than an hour in length, as it took at least that time to explain any important theological point. He bore this in mind, and not long afterwards, when addressing the Cabinet on the subject of his proposed Home Rule bill, his exposition lasted a full three hours, and was listened to ‘in perfect silence’. Of course, holding forth in the Cabinet Room required no great verbal force. But Gladstone often spoke for well over an hour in public, to audiences of 10,000 or more. How did he make himself heard? How did his vocal chords stand it? In the Middle Ages, Muslim clergy, sermonising to vast congregations in the open, were accompanied by a tall, barrel-chested figure with a powerful voice, who repeated fortissimo each phrase as uttered. This man was known as a Loud Speaker. The phrase has persisted into the electronic age. Odd to think that the diabolically amplified caterwauling issuing from pop festivals, which keeps awake decent people within a ten-mile radius, should have its verbal origins in ancient Islam.
More articles from: Paul Johnson | this section
Post this entry to: del.icio.us | Digg | Newsvine | NowPublic | Reddit
Advertisement
It is good that MPs have second jobs — but they should share the proceeds
Peter Jones looks into some classical apophthegms
‘Hyper-parenting’ may be bad — but look what happened when I tried the alternative
A fortnightly column on technology and the web
When I was young, being given ‘options’ was a treat.
By my epic standards, this was an extremely polite best man’s speech
Sarah Standing wonders what has happened to our universities
Roger the Great
If I run for parliament, it will be to campaign for selective education
Who sits in Upper Class? The battle of the sexes was never fiercer
IF YOU ARE PLANNING A CHAMPAGNE RECEPTION and looking for some light entertainment, you can now hire London's busiest steel
BOSC LEBAT, SW France. Only 45 minutes from Toulouse Airport with daily flights from most provincial airports avoiding the horrors
PORTA METRONIA, ROME Standing high on the top of one of the seven hills of Rome- the Coelian- this unique
Spectator Business | Apollo Magazine
Corporate | Advertising | Privacy | Terms
Spectator, 22 Old Queen Street, London, SW1H 9HP
All Articles and Content Copyright ©2008 by The Spectator | All Rights Reserved
Jonathan Steele from Speechmastery.com
June 21st, 2008 12:39pmGreat Point on limiting public speaking timing.
Two of the most memorable speaking experiences in my life were the speakers going over time. Can not even begin to tell you what they said.
One went 15 minutes over and I had to leave to pick up a friend from South Africa just coming to the States.
The other, two speakers before me took 71/2 minutes more than they should have. The break followed my part.
I had to cut my part. Don't remember what they said but my shorter talk is indelibly etched in my head.
Good point for all speakers.