Roasted on a gridiron for the sake of Green pseudo-conscience
It is an indictment of our society that, despite huge scientific advances in the last century, particularly in the production of food, millions of people, perhaps hundreds of millions, do not get enough to eat. The principal culprit is the Green movement, in its many species or fanaticisms. The Prince of Wales, who might be described as the most prominent Green man, has recently drawn attention to the destructive power of his ideology by attacking the growing of genetically modified crops, perhaps the largest step forward ever taken by mankind to reduce the cost of basic foodstuffs, and to increase their production and worldwide availability. I imagine if the Greens had lived in the 18th century they would have attacked the innovators who launched the agricultural revolution in England, which preceded the industrial one later in the century, and prevented mass starvation and chronic famine when the population rose sharply at the same time.
I can just see Green polemicists, for whom their blind faith is a substitute for genuine religion, going for Jethro Tull, author of Horse-Hoeing Husbandry, Thomas Coke and his sheep-shearings, Andrew Meikle, who introduced the threshing machine, Salmon of Woburn and his hay-tossing, and the clay drainage pipes of Thomas Scruggy (what splendid names they had in those days). It is the Greens, with their successful opposition to nuclear power plants in the 1960s, who are responsible for the devastating rise in the cost of fuel, and the Greens again, by bullying governments into giving subsidies for biofuels (the most inefficient way of producing power ever conceived), are responsible for the present food shortage. The rise in fuel and food prices has hit the very poorest groups all over the world. Undernourishment and starvation have followed. If the Greens get their way on their fantasy of man-made global warming, which will mean wrecking the most efficient industrial economies, then the consequences for the poor will be even more horrific. The Green road leads directly to a Malthusian catastrophe. On 10 August this year I witnessed a hailstorm in West Somerset. What price global warming? Actually, hail in August is a not uncommon English event. In 1816, ‘the year without a summer’, Byron was staying on Lake Geneva with, among others, the 18-year-old Mary Shelley. The torrential rain they witnessed, and the electric storm raging over the Alps across the lake, gave her the idea for her novel Frankenstein, the man-made monster galvanised into life by lightning. Byron used to say: ‘An English summer begins on 31 July and ends on 1 August.’ He added: ‘This year the Swiss have gone even further, and eliminated summer altogether.’
More articles from: Paul Johnson | this section
Post this entry to: del.icio.us | Digg | Newsvine | NowPublic | Reddit
Advertisement
If there really is a secret Zionist brotherhood running the world, why aren’t I a member?
Scratch the surface and there is always tragedy, mixed, of course, with wickedness.
When the leaves fall is the fun time of year for artists
Classlessness means your five-year-old chanting ‘sheepshaggers’ on the terraces
A fortnightly column on technology and the web
Contrary to myth, we are becoming ever wittier in our deployment of scorn
Stop throwing bricks! You might hit a bishop’s niece
Peter Jones on President Musharraf and the Roman emperors
I feel like Jim Carrey in The Truman Show, but trapped in the Boden catalogue
Matthew Parris provides an A to Z of things that at one point scared us rigid but the dangers of which now appear to have been greatly exaggerated.
Subscribe to Sky from £16 a month. Get free equipment and free broadband - Join Now. Sky HD - be amongst the first to have it - order now.
Subscribe to Sky from £16 a month. Get free equipment and free broadband - Join Now. Sky HD - be...
PORTA METRONIA, ROME Standing high on the top of one of the seven hills of Rome- the Coelian- this unique
ROME and PARIS: over 350 holiday rentals apartments listed: visit www.romanreference.com and www.parisreference.com or call +39 0648 903612.
Goldsmiths by Design Welcome to Ruffs! You have found a company of Goldsmiths that specialises in the manufacture, amongst other
Spectator Business | Apollo Magazine
Corporate | Advertising | Privacy | Terms
Spectator, 22 Old Queen Street, London, SW1H 9HP
All Articles and Content Copyright ©2008 by The Spectator | All Rights Reserved
Walter Ellis
August 21st, 2008 9:15pmWhat an ill-informed,and ill-natured, buffoon!
ian skidmore
August 22nd, 2008 2:11pmwell said. Global changes of weather are cyclical. In the 17ty cenury there was a wiunte so cold birds were freexing to the trees on wh9ch hey perched. In the Middle Ages we had grape harvests
William
August 23rd, 2008 10:53amPerfect reading, as usual. May I say sir that your column is why I read the Spectator, along with Taki's with his very direct style of common sense. Will we ever know what it was like to live in St Lawrence's day or in the Middle Ages? The overwhelming impression is that it would be much the same, though our lords and masters then also bowed down to God, together with priests, in the same direction (bowing to the altar not the priest), and our perception of the passage of time would perhaps be different. Unfortunately the godless, Soviet ideal whose theories of permanent revolution, "change" i.e. destruction, mass migrations, complete disregard for human life, etc. are still with us.
I believe there is a danger from chemically-altered, GM foods in the way there is from nuclear power. Things can go wrong. I feel Prince Charles is sensible to be cautious, as was the Church faced with Galileo. If less money, effort and intelligence had been spent on the atomic bomb and more on conventional, more efficient, warfare perhaps we might have been able to save Poland and other Christian states from the Soviets -- as it is Poland was ravaged by Hitler and by Stalin (twice) We failed them miserably, possibly for the sake of the arms race per se. And there would certainly have been more to spend on improving the speed and efficiency of the American navy and air-force in the Pacific.
Could the same be said of GM? Could the vast amounts spent on research for a potential “global food weapon” be better spent on local development (charity not loans)? If the world economy allowed poor farmers land and subsistence, markets and training, instead of destroying their cultures by forcing them to migrate and survive in a single monolithic “global” economy, then they could feed themselves, without recourse to Monsanto and other multinational concerns born (I believe) from the US defence complex, who are probably not exactly developing GM crops for the benefit of foreign peasants. Our Industrial Revolution was also on a national or local scale. We didn’t have to beg from faceless men thousands of miles away. We were not threatened by atomic bombs, Chernobyl or Union Carbide slaughter as at Bhopal. I am not a Luddite. I think the USA and Britain should quickly develop clean energy from coal and work to increase the efficiency of solar power. I don’t necessarily believe man is responsible for global warming, but he is obviously responsible for awful pollution and his own quality of life.
You will say that there will always be saints and always those to persecute them, and there will always be those who suffer. I agree. You make St Lawrence’s choices and fate very clear. However, again, what would he say today? Would he side with the Christians or Valerian today -- the poor or the powerful? Tolstoy and Tagore both sided with the poor. I cannot imagine Tagore encouraging his peasant friends to become indentured labourers or factory workers abroad. St Lawrence took the food to the poor. He didn’t lead an army of starving citizens or peasants into a foreign unknown and expect them to pay him back.
drg
August 31st, 2008 1:17amYour comments on the green movement are quite correct. Much of Africa and India starved through the 1950s and 1960s and there was a food emergency. Thus came the green revolution. Through the introduction of semidwarf genes into wheat, more fertiliser was applied to wheat crops, without lodging and yields went up and up.
Now is the time for the next revolution and that is genetically modified crops. Most wheat grown in the world today has some rye DNA in it or wheatgrass DNA and this foreign DNA caries disease resistant genes. We have blindly accepted these harmless modifications and of course the foreign DNA does not necessarily provide disease resistance alone, it is possible that other genes are introduced which affect flour colour and may cause allegic responses in humans who eat the flour. At least with the new technologies which have seen the development of glyphosate tolerant crops, the foreign DNA that is transferred is thoroughly understood.
I thought you should have called the environmentalists a bunch of Luddites, although I can think of several more appropriate terms.
Biofuels have a small place and very minor role to play, but in a short time they will go away. The Reverend Malthus scared the shit out of a lot of people for a short time and then everybody got on with getting rich and fat. It is curious that his theory is still given time in university lecture halls and in the press.
Similarly the Club of Rome scared quite a few people but we all got on with living quite well; and the reality is that we actually need a large population to maintain our happy quality of life. I understand that Italy has a population shortage. It is likely that the members of thewestern world will compete for immigrants in the very near future.
Inland Australia has problems finding both dentists and medical practioners, and there is a problem finding teachers and nurses to staff schools and hospitals beyond the major urban centres of Australia.