Home > The Magazine > Features

Thursday 4 December 2008

Dare to dream and make your ultimate trip a reality

The latest culture as recommended by our staff

Michael Henderson

Michael Henderson suggests

Email registration

Free weekly email update

Great products and special offers for Spectator readers

Click here for great value events

Click here for exclusive articles, offers, tasting notes and discussion

A ray of hope for television

The end of the ‘noddy shot’ is a ray of hope for television

Rod Liddle

Wednesday, 5th September 2007

Channel Five is leading the way to greater transparency

There is maybe something intrinsic to TV that automatically commands our derision; it plays to our faults, as a species — our narcissism, our impatience, our woefully low attention span. Recently, though, the fugue of discontent has grown a little louder, and particularly within the industry. It is not just the flagrant dishonesty of those rigged phone-in shows, which you know all about — the tawdry money-making scams where the public was gulled right, left and centre. That stuff made one or two people within television sit up suddenly and say, ‘Christ, what am I doing with my life?’

Nor is it simply the BBC, or one of the companies which is franchised to work for the Corporation, stitching Her Majesty up like a kipper to gain a few more thousand viewers by pretending she’d had a strop. That stuff has had its impact, sure. It has, for a start, effected a sort of catharsis within TV executives — but a very ‘TV’ catharsis, rather than the kind of thing which might have been recognised as such by Aristotle. There has been much photogenic hand-wringing and crocodile tears, but in the end I doubt very much that there is the will to change things a great deal. Meanwhile, the bosses of the various TV channels have appeared before us and said hell, what can we do to regain the trust of the audience?

Thing is, they never had the trust in the first place: the public isn’t stupid. Television is known popularly as the ‘idiot box’ for a good reason; the viewing public know it’s a scam and a con, but it performs a function, it fills in those terrible longueurs which might otherwise be occupied by human interaction and that scary thing, conversation.

Previous page 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 Next page

More articles from: Rod Liddle | this section

Print this article | Email to a friend | Permalink | Comment

Post this entry to: del.icio.us | Digg | Newsvine | NowPublic | Reddit

New Sondheim: enjoy it while stocks last

Gerald Kaufman

Gerald Kaufman is enthralled by the first Sondheim premiere in 14 years. A minor work Road Show may be, but it is still worth much more than anyone else’s musicals

The law applies to Damian Green, too

Rod Liddle

Rod Liddle is reluctant to join the journalistic herd in its unqualified outrage at the Tory MP’s arrest. But it is certainly time to put the police under the microscope

After Baby P: the crisis in child foster care

Mary Wakefield

Mary Wakefield talks to a courageous woman who blew the whistle on the deep systemic failures in the foster care service — and whose only reward was to be hounded and vilified

The global force behind Mumbai’s agony is in our midst

Stephen Schwartz

Stephen Schwartz and Irfan Al-Alawi say that LET — the Army of the Righteous — is a worldwide Islamist organisation which is well-established in Britain. The Mumbai atrocities are further proof that the march of Islamic extremism is the central fact of our time

‘They treat me more like a devil than a god’

Lloyd Evans

Lloyd Evans finds that Bernard-Henri Lévy is not the ageing French dandy of caricature but a serious intellectual with views on everything from Barack Obama to the Muslim veil

Apocalypse now

James Delingpole

The TV programmes you watched as a child are like acid flashbacks.

Chicago Notebook

Emily Maitlis

In the end, it really was a fairytale.

Is Barack Obama really black? Actually, I’m not so sure

Rod Liddle

Rod Liddle, who wanted the Democrat to win, says the racial dimension to this presidential election was never straightforward, and probably favoured Obama rather than McCain

The Tory quest for a fiscal Holy Grail is doomed

Irwin Stelzer

Brown’s golden rules have been exposed as a sham, says Irwin Stelzer, but the Tory response has been feeble. Their target should be the PM’s feathering of Old Labour nests