Wednesday 15 October 2008

 

The latest culture as recommended by our staff

Michael Henderson

Michael Henderson suggests


‘So close to war’

We came so close to World War Three that day

Wednesday, 3rd October 2007

On 6 September, when Israel struck a nuclear facility in Syria

Equally, Iran has been put on notice that Israel will not tolerate any nuclear threat. Washington, too, has been reminded that Israel’s intelligence is often a better guide than its own in the region, a crucial point given the divisions between the Israeli and American intelligence assessments about the development of the Iranian bomb. Hezbollah, the Iranian/Syrian proxy force, has also been put on notice that the air-defence system it boasted would alter the strategic balance in the region is impotent in the face of Israeli technology.

Meanwhile, a senior Israeli analyst told us this week that the most disturbing aspect of the affair from a global perspective is the willingness of states to share their technologies and their weapons of mass destruction. ‘I do not believe that the former Soviet Union shared its WMD technology,’ he said. ‘And they were careful to limit the range of the Scud missiles they were prepared to sell. Since the end of the Cold War, though, we know the Russians significantly exceeded those limits when selling missile technology to Iran.’

But the floodgates were opened wide by the renegade Pakistan nuclear scientist Abdul Qadeer Khan, who is revered in Pakistan as the Father of the Islamic Bomb. Khan established a virtual supermarket of nuclear technologies, parts and plans which operated for more than a decade on a global stage. After his operation was shut down in 2004, Khan admitted transferring technology and parts to Iran, Libya and North Korea. Proliferation experts are convinced they know the identities of at least three of his many other clients: Egypt, Saudi Arabia and Syria.

In addition to selling nuclear-related knowhow, the Khan network is also believed to have provided Syria with centrifuges for producing enriched uranium. In 2003, concern about Syria’s nuclear ambitions was heightened when an experimental American electronic eavesdropping device picked up distinctive signals indicating that the Syrians had not only acquired the centrifuges but were actually operating them.

If Israel’s military strike on Dayr as Zawr last month was surgical, so, too, was its handling of the aftermath. The only certainty in the fog of cover-up is that something big happened on 6 September — something very big. At the very least, it illustrates that WMD and rogue states pose the single greatest threat to world peace. We may have escaped from this incident without war, but if Iran is allowed to continue down the nuclear path, it is hard to believe that we will be so lucky again.

Douglas Davis is a former senior editor of the Jerusalem Post and James Forsyth is online editor of The Spectator.

Subscribe now

Post this entry to:   del.icio.us | Digg | Newsvine | NowPublic | Reddit

Comments

Post a comment


Your comment:*

Your name:*

Your email address:*
(We won't publish this)

*Required information

Please click the button only once - your comment will not be published immediately

Neil Taylor

October 4th, 2007 4:17pm

Sir If an operation on the scale of that suggested by Douglas Davis and James Forsyth's article had taken place, would there not be distinctive and measurable radioactivity in the area?

Bill Hensler

October 4th, 2007 6:28pm

You Brits are lucky. Here in the USA they are having major investigations into the way a major radio personality said a set of words. I've got to read your news to find out how close we came to World War 3 (or 4 or 5, depends who's counting) Anyway, keep up the good reporting.

Agincourt

October 4th, 2007 8:21pm

A very serious business. But well done Israel. And Iran - do us all a favour & lay off the nukes! Otherwise....!

Lee Jakeman

October 4th, 2007 10:00pm

The nuclear "parking" explanation seems to me the most logical and likely.

SimoHurtta

October 4th, 2007 10:58pm

Come-on shipping nuclear material from North Korea with a 42 years old 1700 ton a ship, with a rather strange Korean name Al Hamad, passing two naval blockades and stopping in numerous ports. Even in Tripoli, Lebanon and uses one month to come from Port Said. http://www.haaretz.com/hasen/spages/903991.html So far the nuclear "theory" doesn't make any sense. If it would be true why on earth do not Israeli and US reveal all possible evidence of that nuclear "transport"? Naturally if there was nothing this rumour tactics is better.

JohnM

October 5th, 2007 9:52am

"The only problem is that no one outside a tight-lipped knot of top Israeli and American officials knows precisely what that threat involved." I suggest that maybe the Syrians might have a little idea too!

Ed C

October 5th, 2007 3:28pm

Is'nt it interesting that a B-52 was discovered to have 6 cruise missle nukes on board at Barksdale on 9/6. Preparation or a threat-keep it quite or else. Close call, I would say.

Tom

October 5th, 2007 3:57pm

The syrians silence is, in my opinion, the largest admission of serious guilt possible.

Byron Ware

October 5th, 2007 9:29pm

Israel, yes, once up on a time the US could get away with doing just that! we have to many bleeding hearts for our enemys... Byron W.

the nationalist

October 7th, 2007 2:09am

Bloody business, for sure. How many countries will eventually get the bomb before the whole world goes up in a fireball?

Vince P

October 7th, 2007 10:58pm

We're already in World War Three. Our wonderful (sarcasm) leaders don't seem to know it yet.

burnet1187

October 8th, 2007 3:38am

Curiouser and curiouser... Least improbable would be a functional nuclear device.

Angel Elf

October 8th, 2007 3:18pm

I think that after all the money spent by Kim on his atom bomb project the bomb was a dud. Notice how quick he was to give up the project? So now he has all of this nuclear material to sell to someone that can use it. Also the lack of protest from Syria is deafening. Could it be that the Israelis have threatened Assad himself? Remember that overflight by Israeli planes last summer? It seems that Israeli planes can penetrate Syrian air defense with ease.

Eric

October 8th, 2007 6:49pm

Ed C Said: October 5th, 2007 3:28pm Is'nt it interesting that a B-52 was discovered to have 6 cruise missle nukes on board at Barksdale on 9/6. Preparation or a threat-keep it quite or else. Close call, I would say. Eric says: Wow. Wow. Wow. You're probably right. It was no accident.

Rob Kay

October 9th, 2007 1:55am

The use of a sensationalistic headline just to get people to read your story is the apex of incompetent journalism. We came close to WWIII? Please. There is not a single thing that Israel could bomb in Syria that would lead the world to WWIII.

val savarese

October 9th, 2007 9:31am

I checked the validity of yr article on an Israeli website which deals with terrorism espionage and political analysis. The attack did take place but neither side admits to why, it is presumed the Israeli jets went in to test the recently purchased missile defence system from Russia installed in Iran and Syria. If u want the name on the site u are welcome to email me.

BDUSA

October 9th, 2007 11:59pm

Mr. Kay: You may have missed the point, which I believe is "allowing the target to remain unstruck" was the WW III threat.

Michael Cecire

October 10th, 2007 5:19pm

I've heard the greatest amount of credence lent to the 'nuclear parking' and 'dirty bomb' theories for the strike. Syria's silence on the matter, however, stems not only from admission by omission, but also a shocking realization that recently purchased Russian AA systems - supposedly some of the most sophisticated in the world - proved ineffectual against the F-15I (I for Israel. It's not F151.). The F-15I, it should be noted, is not built for stealth. As a matter of fact, its radar cross section is rather obvious; what I've read, however, is that the Israelis employed some kind of communications-network attack to falsify radar data so that their strike flight remained undetected. This is conjecture and hypothesis, but either way it has given the Syrians a nasty scare - their air defense networks are supposedly one of the most comprehensive in the world - as well as their Iranian allies, who have also received similar air defense packages. I'm sure this doesn't make the Russians particularly happy either.

Rob Kay

October 11th, 2007 2:24am

BDUSA: I do see your point and as I often peruse these sites late in the evening I certainly could miss a point. But, as a reread all 3 pages of the story I am still am led to believe that WWIII could have begun "that day." I take that to mean that a Syrian retaliation would have started WWIII which, to me, is ludicrous. But, maybe I am wrong. Let me float this thought..what if there is nothing what-so-ever wrong with the Russian equipment, but the Syrian air defense operators were ordered to stand down? Could the near silence of all parties and lack of Syrian retaliation not be explained by such a scenario?

Michael Robinson

October 23rd, 2007 9:19pm

what a relief!!

eileen m

October 23rd, 2007 11:15pm

Where is the Necular Fallout!!!!!!

The Voice

November 11th, 2007 7:16am

Kudos! About freaking time! America & Israel forever. Now if you just get Condi to cancel that blasted conference that leads to hell, things might just get better.

charly.a

November 22nd, 2007 6:26pm

fear keeps people under control..if there was nuke material after bombing it fallout shouldt be everywhere..dont get too paranoid..cause they want you to be so..

Pl.Jus

November 23rd, 2007 9:59am

Noone seems to report that this strike has put Olmert out of a difficult position. Probably that was the cause and not a nuclear cargo just politics micromanagement. As far as the undetected part etc I ve heard that the place was very near to turkey - do you know how much time does it take for f-15 to attack from turkey borders to syria?? if they did attack at all from syrian airspace and they did just used stand off weapons (popey 150KM range among others)

J. Guth

November 26th, 2007 4:20pm

Thank you for the heads-up on this vital information and assessment. It's better than any of the so-called "news sources" in the U.S. have made. Our government is completely broken and now it seems that governments all around the world are too. Six weeks after the fact, we should be hearing nothing about this but I only received this story today by email.

Roger Hague

April 11th, 2008 2:28pm

I know little about these matters but wouldn't it be true that bombing an installation containing large supplies of nuclear material is very hazardous to the health of people in the surroundings, and even further afield as happenened in Chernobyl? Or am I missing something important here?

bill gates

July 12th, 2008 6:10am

don't panic
radiation has a half life of a thousand years
you will fry brother

choco

September 12th, 2008 9:21pm

no fission - no fallout.
a bombing does not produce fission, even though going there for holidays would probably not be so funny.. anyways, it's a remote area.


The Spectator Parliamentarian Awards
The Spectator Billabong

In this section

Web Exclusive: Lloyd Evans on Thomas Friedman

Lloyd Evans

Thomas Friedman, the influential American commentator, addressed Intelligence Squared on his new book, ‘Hot, Flat and Crowded. Why the world needs a green revolution and how we can renew our global future.’

An evening with the Muslim Facebook crew

Sarfraz Manzoor

Sarfraz Manzoor celebrates an iftar meal with homeless people and his fellow Muslims, a web-generated ‘flashmob’ observing an Islamic tradition of generosity to the needy

Strictly Come Dancing is not the BBC’s core broadcasting

Rod Liddle

Rod Liddle — a former editor of the Today programme — says that the Corporation must stop pretending to be democratic if it is to keep the licence fee. Unashamed elitism is the only chance that the Beeb has in the new media world

Only Abba can save the world financial markets

Martin Vander Weyer

Martin Vander Weyer says that the collapse in the markets reflects a loss of confidence that is out of proportion to all reason: a trip to Mamma Mia! is the answer to this hysteria

Amid the financial turmoil, Peter versus George is the key battle

Fraser Nelson

Stand by for a mighty clash between two politicians, says Fraser Nelson. The now infamous dinner between Mandelson and Osborne was a cordial parting for power-brokers of different generations who will fight each other savagely for electoral advantage

Related articles

‘You grow up with footballs. We grow up with kukris’

James Delingpole

James Delingpole meets the Gurkha veterans seeking citizenship rights in the courts and says that, this time, the government has picked the wrong fight

IQ2 debate — Paths to Peace: proposals to resolve the Israeli-Palestinian conflict

Lloyd Evans

In at the deep end.

Don’t mention the Afghan–Pakistan war

Fraser Nelson

Both Britain and America are reluctant to admit it but, says Fraser Nelson, our most pressing foreign policy problem is what to do about Pakistan, a nuclear-armed state in which terrorists have taken sanctuary

I feel for Ingrid Betancourt — I was kidnapped, too

Tristan Garel-Jones

Tristan Garel-Jones on being kidnapped and why the world should stand with Colombia

Obama and McCain offer a choice, not an echo

Irwin Stelzer

This presidential race will be the first real Right v. Left contest in a long time, says Irwin Stelzer. On free trade, healthcare, tax and pariah regimes, the two men are worlds apart

Spectator recommends

Sky TV, Broadband & Talk from £16 a Month

Sky TV & free broadband packages available from £16 a month. Choose from a standard free sky box, sky plus...


Spectator classifieds

ROME CENTRE

PORTA METRONIA, ROME Standing high on the top of one of the seven hills of Rome- the Coelian- this unique

City Breaks. ROME and PARIS

ROME and PARIS: over 350 holiday rentals apartments listed: visit  www.romanreference.com  and  www.parisreference.com or call +39 0648 903612.

Jewellery. RUFFS (Estd. 1904).

Goldsmiths by Design Welcome to Ruffs!  You have found a company of Goldsmiths that specialises in the manufacture, amongst other