Home > The Magazine > Features

Wednesday 3 December 2008

Dare to dream and make your ultimate trip a reality

The latest culture as recommended by our staff

Michael Henderson

Michael Henderson suggests

Email registration

Free weekly email update

Great products and special offers for Spectator readers

Click here for great value events

Click here for exclusive articles, offers, tasting notes and discussion

Gordon Brown vs David Cameron

Irwin Stelzer

Wednesday, 14th June 2006

Irwin Stelzer says that the sharp policy distinctions of the past are no more, but that the choice ahead of the voters is still one to relish. This is his audit of the scores so far

On the environment, both men are vying to gain title to the greenest of the green. Brown has his climate change levy, which is more about the Chancellor’s restless search for revenue than about greenhouse gas emissions — witness the fact that it is levied on non-polluting nuclear power. Cameron has offered a series of bizarre stunts (windmills on your roof, biking to work with a trailing ministerial car) and sensible proposals (a combination of targets and market incentives to encourage switching from petrol), but we will have to see just how much economic growth he will be willing to sacrifice on the altar of environmentalism, should the need for such a trade-off become apparent. Brown has decided to live with Blair’s decision to favour the construction of costly nuclear plants, not the most efficient way to increase electricity output while reducing carbon emissions. Cameron, whose backbenchers are more pro-nuclear than Brown’s, is nevertheless more sceptical about providing taxpayers’ money for an industry unwilling to commit its own capital without promises of substantial subsidies: he remains open to arguments that there might be more cost-effective ways of meeting both environmental and energy security needs. Since a significant portion of the costs associated with nuclear come at the tail-end of the lives of these plants, when both Brown and Cameron will be dozing in the House of Lords, or worse, the attraction of the nuclear option for politicians is that they can favour it now and leave it to their successors to bear the final costs. It will be interesting to see which man avoids that temptation.

A final thought about domestic policy. Cameron will operate under an imperative and a constraint that will be absent in the case of Brown: the healthcare, education and other domestic policies he may propose will directly affect his constituents. Brown will be developing programmes that will have no effect on the Scots living in the constituency that sent him to Parliament. That lack of direct democratic accountability is a worrying feature of what Andrew Neil has called ‘the Scottish Raj’.

Previous page 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 Next page

More articles from: Irwin Stelzer | this section

Print this article | Email to a friend | Permalink | Comment

Post this entry to: del.icio.us | Digg | Newsvine | NowPublic | Reddit

I will always defend a big spender like J.M. Keynes

Nancy Dell�Olio

Nancy Dell’Olio makes an impassioned case for Keynesian economics as the necessary remedy for the global crisis. It is to the Cambridge economist that we should turn once more

How I became Bulgaria’s etiquette guru

Dylan Jones

Dylan Jones is astonished to find in Sofia that the former communist country has embraced his guide to the mores of modern life — and that not everybody looks like Borat

Rudd has lurched from indecision to phoney war

Matthew Castray

Matthew Castray looks back on the Australian Prime Minister’s first year in office and audits an administration which has reviewed much and done very little

Incompetence is fine: but being offensive is sure to get you sacked

Rod Liddle

Rod Liddle says that something has gone wrong when 15 South Lanarkshire social workers are sacked over a dodgy Gary Glitter joke while none of their counterparts in Haringey has even been reprimanded over the ‘Baby P’ case

Brown has played into the hands of the Tory Bullingdon Boys he loathes

Fraser Nelson

Fraser Nelson says that the Pre-Budget Report killed off New Labour without landing a punch on the Tories. It has paved the way for a new Conservatism, in which Cameron woos aspirational voters, focuses on government debt and looks for responsible spending cuts

Thank goodness we can have a run on the pound when we need one

Martin Vander Weyer

Martin Vander Weyer looks ahead to next week’s Pre-Budget Report and reflects on George Osborne’s contentious remarks about the devaluation of sterling. It looks like Gordon Brown is getting away with his borrowing binge — leaving the Tories isolated

The Republicans are where the Tories were in 1997

James Forsyth

This is bad news for the Conservatives, who have always feasted on US right-of-centre ideas, says James Forsyth. But the GOP can learn from the Cameroons

Want to cut taxes? First cut spending. Here’s how

Fraser Nelson

After a week of clamorous competition between the parties over tax cuts, Fraser Nelson offers a guide to paying for them: a programme of spending cuts that would preserve core services but shave off the fat of the Brown years. All that is needed is political will

There is nothing magic about this Keynesian fad

Tim Congdon

Last week, The Spectator said that ‘Keynesianism is not the answer’. Here, Tim Congdon says the government’s economic recovery strategy is a sham based on outmoded leftist thinking

As Brown poses as FDR, look ahead to a very new capitalism

Charles Leadbeater

Charles Leadbeater, the acclaimed innovator and new media analyst, predicts a transformed landscape: a new ‘networked’ capitalism in which the state plays a part but cannot pick winners — a system that is chastened, subdued and fraught with social danger