Home > The Magazine > Features

Wednesday 3 December 2008

Dare to dream and make your ultimate trip a reality

The latest culture as recommended by our staff

Michael Henderson

Michael Henderson suggests

Email registration

Free weekly email update

Great products and special offers for Spectator readers

Click here for great value events

Click here for exclusive articles, offers, tasting notes and discussion

Gordon Brown vs David Cameron

Irwin Stelzer

Wednesday, 14th June 2006

Irwin Stelzer says that the sharp policy distinctions of the past are no more, but that the choice ahead of the voters is still one to relish. This is his audit of the scores so far

When it comes to Britain’s position in the world, I must warn readers that I speak with the prejudice of an American who believes, with Winston Churchill, Margaret Thatcher and Tony Blair, that the cause of world peace and order is best served by the special relationship between our countries. Blair, Brown and Cameron all believe that that relationship serves Britain’s interests, even though at times America regrettably neglects its end of the reciprocity bargain. But Blair was able to move seamlessly from third-way talkfests with Bill Clinton to a wartime alliance with George W. Bush. Brown’s more left-leaning domestic politics makes it less likely that he will be as comfortable with a Republican president as would Cameron. After all, Brown values his chats with Democratic strategist Bob Shrum, a certified Bush-hater (whose candidates have lost in all of the seven campaigns he has managed), while Cameron has adopted President Bush’s language of ‘compassionate conservatism’, and recently had his shadow Cabinet visit Washington to re-establish ties with the Republican White House, State Department and economic team. The Bush-haters in Britain will deem this a stain on Cameron’s escutcheon; America-lovers a positive. Americans will worry, and so should the world, that Brown’s flirtation with a Democratic party that has become neo-isolationist and his desire to skimp on military spending will reduce Britain’s effectiveness as an American partner in maintaining world order.

That’s the score sheet. Las Vegas roulette wheel operators like to say, ‘You pays your money, and you takes your choice.’ Or they did before the Strip became as high-toned as it is today. British voters surely are paying enough in taxes to have the right to make a choice. But for now, watchful waiting is the best course. There is still time for Gordon Brown to establish his reform credentials by backing Blair on education, healthcare, crime and other issues — and not merely with mumbled asides or press releases from the safe distance of Africa or China. And there is still time for David Cameron to prove he is not a Lib Dem pretty face in Tory clothing. A reformist Brown v. a modern but conservative Tory, that’s a choice for a nation to relish.

Irwin Stelzer is director of economic policy studies at the Hudson Institute and a columnist for the Sunday Times.

Previous page 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9

More articles from: Irwin Stelzer | this section

Print this article | Email to a friend | Permalink | Comment

Post this entry to: del.icio.us | Digg | Newsvine | NowPublic | Reddit

Murdoch’s big secret is that he doesn’t have one

Michael Wolff

Michael Wolff reveals how he secured Rupert Murdoch’s co-operation for his biography and discovered that this media titan has no interest in posterity. He is, at heart, a city editor

I will always defend a big spender like J.M. Keynes

Nancy Dell�Olio

Nancy Dell’Olio makes an impassioned case for Keynesian economics as the necessary remedy for the global crisis. It is to the Cambridge economist that we should turn once more

How I became Bulgaria’s etiquette guru

Dylan Jones

Dylan Jones is astonished to find in Sofia that the former communist country has embraced his guide to the mores of modern life — and that not everybody looks like Borat

Rudd has lurched from indecision to phoney war

Matthew Castray

Matthew Castray looks back on the Australian Prime Minister’s first year in office and audits an administration which has reviewed much and done very little

Incompetence is fine: but being offensive is sure to get you sacked

Rod Liddle

Rod Liddle says that something has gone wrong when 15 South Lanarkshire social workers are sacked over a dodgy Gary Glitter joke while none of their counterparts in Haringey has even been reprimanded over the ‘Baby P’ case

Brown has played into the hands of the Tory Bullingdon Boys he loathes

Fraser Nelson

Fraser Nelson says that the Pre-Budget Report killed off New Labour without landing a punch on the Tories. It has paved the way for a new Conservatism, in which Cameron woos aspirational voters, focuses on government debt and looks for responsible spending cuts

Thank goodness we can have a run on the pound when we need one

Martin Vander Weyer

Martin Vander Weyer looks ahead to next week’s Pre-Budget Report and reflects on George Osborne’s contentious remarks about the devaluation of sterling. It looks like Gordon Brown is getting away with his borrowing binge — leaving the Tories isolated

The Republicans are where the Tories were in 1997

James Forsyth

This is bad news for the Conservatives, who have always feasted on US right-of-centre ideas, says James Forsyth. But the GOP can learn from the Cameroons

Want to cut taxes? First cut spending. Here’s how

Fraser Nelson

After a week of clamorous competition between the parties over tax cuts, Fraser Nelson offers a guide to paying for them: a programme of spending cuts that would preserve core services but shave off the fat of the Brown years. All that is needed is political will

There is nothing magic about this Keynesian fad

Tim Congdon

Last week, The Spectator said that ‘Keynesianism is not the answer’. Here, Tim Congdon says the government’s economic recovery strategy is a sham based on outmoded leftist thinking