The politically correct have declared Powell an unperson
The issue in this case is not about immigration at all, but about the language our politicians use, the things they are allowed to say and the stuff they are not allowed to say. Increasingly, politics has become a vapid and meaningless discourse, conducted in a sort of hideous, politically correct grammar, deviation from which results in an immediate summons to head office. It is no wonder that the public feels estranged from the great debate, when the debate is couched in such terms that meaning is almost impossible to discern. All we have is an endless glissando of empty nouns — stakeholder, community, diversity, and so on. The politicians — and one or two journalists, such as John Lloyd and Steve Richards — insist that we, the media, are to blame for this state of affairs, that our propensity as journalists to leap upon anything controversial, or which might be seen as a gaffe, has caused the bosses of our three major political parties to be ever more constraining. But the public is not stupid: it knows what it thinks and it has a tendency to respect those who speak their minds, regardless of the faux-furore which the press might whip up as a result. How else can one explain the popularity of Boris Johnson, or, for that matter, Ken Livingstone?
I don’t know who will replace Nigel Hastilow as the candidate for Halesowen and Rowley Regis, but whoever it is would be well advised to keep his gob shut about immigration. There is almost nothing you can say about it which will be risk-free — so better by far just to shut your mouth and not mention it at all.
More articles from: Rod Liddle | this section
Post this entry to: del.icio.us | Digg | Newsvine | NowPublic | Reddit
Advertisement
Theodore Dalrymple examines the evidence against two much-vilified British paediatricians, Professors Southall and Meadow, and finds it sadly lacking
Rod Liddle says that the appointment of an inexperienced, gun-toting formerbeauty queen as his running mate may well be John McCain’s undoing
Ross Clark says that far from keeping our streets safer or cleaner, the government’s new force of amateur policemen are ignoring the worst offenders and pursuing law-abiding innocents instead
Christina Lamb interviews the husband of the late Benazir Bhutto, Asif Ali Zardari, who hopes to be named President of Pakistan this Saturday
Free and open to everyone, the Queen’s Diamond Jubilee in 2012 will eclipse the London Games, says Robert Hardman — an unforgettable tribute to the monarch
The ‘No’ republic
Taking sides
It didn’t occur to Cameron that White Van Man might be trying to pat him on the back
The taboo on discussing migration has only been partly lifted, says Dennis Sewell. We pretend that all migrants are the same, whereas the statistics reveal some uncomfortable truths
The view from 2018: how it all went wrong for Prime Minister Osborne
Sky TV & free broadband packages available from £16 a month. Choose from a standard free sky box, sky plus or sky hd.
Sky TV & free broadband packages available from £16 a month. Choose from a standard free sky box, sky plus...
PORTA METRONIA, ROME Standing high on the top of one of the seven hills of Rome- the Coelian- this unique
ROME and PARIS: over 350 holiday rentals apartments listed: visit www.romanreference.com and www.parisreference.com or call +39 0648 903612.
Goldsmiths by Design Welcome to Ruffs! You have found a company of Goldsmiths that specialises in the manufacture, amongst other
Spectator Business | Apollo Magazine
Corporate | Advertising | Privacy | Terms
Spectator, 22 Old Queen Street, London, SW1H 9HP
All Articles and Content Copyright ©2008 by The Spectator | All Rights Reserved
Ioannes Hiberniensis
November 8th, 2007 7:16pmAn "oppportunist"? What an extraordinary comment. I would have thought that opportunist was the last thing one would call Enoch Powell. The man's life is a textbook case in how to destroy one's career through truth-telling.
JohnC
November 10th, 2007 8:41amThe very best article todate I have read on the true nature of the sorry current state of public discussion about immigration. You have hit the nail on the head, political dicourse only using PC grammer, any deviation or use of the word Enoch! you are branded a racist, xenophobic, Nazi sympathiser. Being married to an Asian(lady), how sad I feel compelled to preface this statement on uncontrolled immigration before going public about its impact on social cohesion,stress on public services due to Central Government in denial to the reality of the numbers already here. The travisty for me about 10 years of Labour is how our service personnel are dying in foreign fields to "protect" our way of life while at home an open door policy allows untold numbers in to create this multicultural Nivahna and the greatest upheaval in our population mix since the Saxon,Viking raids of the post Roman era. Enoch Powell was an arrogant brilliant intellectual who valued absolute truth and rigerous logic but moved in the toxic enviroment of politics, where mendacity and obsfucation is the norm.
L Stewart
November 11th, 2007 2:38amMr Liddle is right in everything he says, including advice on immigration to each & every Tory hopeful that "there is almost nothing you can say about it which will be risk-free - so better by far just shut your mouth and not mention it at all." Of course, our Ron may be 'tongue in cheek', but most typical New Conservatives will do just that. Let's not damage our gracefully ageing or shiny new careers. Leave it to the BNP to say it all, they don't have fabulous salaries and wonderful allowances to lose. Principles ? Concern for the very destruction of the British nation ? Please. Don't be so naive.
Noela Fraser
November 11th, 2007 3:02amWhat a mess the UK is in because politicians no longer consider the views of the people they are supposed to represent. A plague on them all.
Bill Cass
November 11th, 2007 8:35amA fine article and some highly interesting comments. Enoch Powell was by no means a political opportunist.For those who can remember,he was making highly controversil speeches for many years before 1968 and even those like me who at the time rarely agreed with him found him usually at least intersting and always very precise in his use of words.Speaking as someone who has been in a mixed marriage and whose own children are a very attractive ethnic cocktail,I can claim at least not to be racist even as I acknowledge that on many issues Powell has proved right.It seems to me that there is an underlying racism in those who refuse to discuss an issue openly - as if it touches some deep guilt feelings they would prefer not to explore. On a course in France in the early eighties, I found myself the only white guest at an all- night drinks party thrown by a large group of black students from various parts of Africa.It was not until the early hours of the morning that I realised I was the only white guest when I found myself defending some actions of the Empire.In this position, I accused my hosts themselves of being racist and asked why there were no other white guests.The reply: You are the only one who just says what you believe without embarrassment. I think we would all prefer honest discussion to furtive PC.
Robert James Watkins
November 11th, 2007 5:19pmCouldn't agree more. I have e-mailed the local Conservative Association to complain. David Cameron should be ashamed of himself. I only wish I was as literate as Ron Liddle, and capable of putting my opinion (and that of most of my friends and work colleagues)more strongly without being offensive.
Ollamh Fodhla
November 11th, 2007 7:57pmPolitics used to be War by other means, Jaw-Jaw, Sticks n Stones...; now it is about self-censorship, evading the shocking truth, spin (sorry deception) and touchy-feely inuendo. The Tory high command, by its sacking of two honest candidates who only articulate, in moderate language, what the reasonable voters are telling them, is only encouraging massive native Celto-Saxon frustration and future horrible Civil War. Sack the Camerooons instead!
Afagddu
November 16th, 2007 9:13amExcellent article, and some very timely (if depressing) comment from Richard Dell, Chingford Man, John C etc. The task of emasculated policitians is made infinitely easier with the aid of a collusive and mendacious press and media. In my opinion the BBC has much to answer for. Typically, it "addresses" awkward questions relating to its own betrayal of the public interest by invoking derogations which effectively dismiss such questions as inadmissible. So much for openness and accountability.
Rosemary Gitsham
November 16th, 2007 10:15amNigel Hastilow was quite right, and so was Enoch Powell all those years ago. It is the fault of the government which has let this country get in such a mess. You cannot blame the immigrants, illegal or legal for trying to get a better life in a country that bends over backwards to give them all they need. But the Government should consider the needs of its indigenous citizens before those of the wider world.