Revolution at the London Library
The Stalinists have taken over the London Library
High drama at the AGM of a literary institution
To be a member is like belonging to a kind of club. To roam the open stacks, with their extraordinary assemblages of known and unknown authors, makes me — member No. 0317 — feel, however briefly, that I may be a sort of intellectual, after all.
Or, at least, it has until now had that air of friendly mutual support. The library isn’t a ‘mutual’ in the technical sense of the Yorkshire Building Society or the Wine Society. But it has appeared to be run in a spirit of collegiality. That spirit evaporated last week, confronted with a display of central committee Stalinism. The anger had to be heard to be believed. One distinguished former trustee has said it may be the beginning of the end for a great institution.
This was the AGM, which is normally, I believe, a polite little get-together — meeting the trustees over a glass of wine. What caused the blow-up? Why did I, and so many others, go along for the first time? We’d received a little green brochure, tucked in with the annual report, saying that the trustees had decided to near-double the subs — from £210 a year to £375. No organisation I have ever belonged to, public or private, commercial or charitable, has given its customers such a cold-bath experience. The usual effect of such drastic price rises is to drive people away. A peculiar way to run a railroad.
I went along, ready to propose that the matter should be referred back for further consideration. There are worries about running costs, which the trustees have allowed to drift on. The library has also, as one member noted, plunged into buying, and converting, adjacent property in the dearest part of the dearest capital in the world; the idea is to cling to its policy of holding absolutely every book on site. In the resultant panic, the membership subscription is targeted. Allegedly, it now only covers 55 per cent of its true cost. Even so, why couldn’t any increase be staged, especially at a moment when an authoritative survey finds that the average income of authors from their work is £4,000 a year?
More articles from: Paul Barker | this section
Post this entry to: del.icio.us | Digg | Newsvine | NowPublic | Reddit
Advertisement
Murdoch’s big secret is that he doesn’t have one
Michael WolffMichael Wolff reveals how he secured Rupert Murdoch’s co-operation for his biography and discovered that this media titan has no interest in posterity. He is, at heart, a city editor
I will always defend a big spender like J.M. Keynes
Nancy Dell’OlioNancy Dell’Olio makes an impassioned case for Keynesian economics as the necessary remedy for the global crisis. It is to the Cambridge economist that we should turn once more
How I became Bulgaria’s etiquette guru
Dylan JonesDylan Jones is astonished to find in Sofia that the former communist country has embraced his guide to the mores of modern life — and that not everybody looks like Borat
Rudd has lurched from indecision to phoney war
Matthew CastrayMatthew Castray looks back on the Australian Prime Minister’s first year in office and audits an administration which has reviewed much and done very little
Incompetence is fine: but being offensive is sure to get you sacked
Rod LiddleRod Liddle says that something has gone wrong when 15 South Lanarkshire social workers are sacked over a dodgy Gary Glitter joke while none of their counterparts in Haringey has even been reprimanded over the ‘Baby P’ case
For a bit of perspective, try thinking Jurassic
Christopher LloydThe first takeaways originated about 150 million years ago, says Christopher Lloyd; global travel is pretty ancient, too. And as for democracy...
Sense of occasion
Alan JuddThe first Rolls-Royce I drove was a 1960s Shadow, across the Cairngorms on the glorious A939 to Tomintoul.
The Spectator's Notes
Charles MooreCharles Moore's reflections on the week
Adventures of a lost soul
Philip ZieglerEttie: The Intimate Life and Dauntless Spirit of Lady Desborough, by Richard Davenport-Hines
Status Anxiety
Toby Young
Why Kirsten Dunst banned me from the set of the film about my life
Latest blog posts
sponsored links
Free Sky Digital Offer - Order Now
Subscribe to Sky from £16 a month. Get free equipment and free broadband - Join Now. Sky HD - be amongst the first to have it - order now.
Free Sky Digital Offer - Order Now
Subscribe to Sky from £16 a month. Get free equipment and free broadband - Join Now. Sky HD - be...
ROME CENTRE
PORTA METRONIA, ROME Standing high on the top of one of the seven hills of Rome- the Coelian- this unique
City Breaks. ROME and PARIS
ROME and PARIS: over 350 holiday rentals apartments listed: visit www.romanreference.com and www.parisreference.com or call +39 0648 903612.
Jewellery. RUFFS (Estd. 1904).
Goldsmiths by Design Welcome to Ruffs! You have found a company of Goldsmiths that specialises in the manufacture, amongst other
Spectator Business | Apollo Magazine
Corporate | Advertising | Privacy | Terms
Spectator, 22 Old Queen Street, London, SW1H 9HP
All Articles and Content Copyright ©2008 by The Spectator | All Rights Reserved
Margaret Gaskin
November 11th, 2007 3:06pmAs a member of the Library who swallowed the increase but didn't attend the meeting, can I thank all those who did for putting up a fight –not against higher prices, which may be inevitable, but against an apparently high-handed attitude that does indeed seem to go against everything I have ever felt about this great institution. The committee may feel they have been preaching to the choir for years now and this sudden increase has at least stirred members from their desks. Well, clearly, all members who care about the institution must stir their stumps and be prepared to give more (in time and commitment) in return for their great inheritance to ensure that a genuine democracy of intellect prevails. We none of us created the London Library, but we should be ashamed to feel that we stood by while its spirit, if not its substance, was destroyed.