The Kremlin is full of paranoia, not aggression
Even if Mr Putin does stand down as president after he completes his second term of office next year, it will be business as usual for the small clique of former KGB officers — the siloviki — who effectively run the country and who have made vast personal fortunes out of what is officially described as the nationalisation of Russia’s oil wealth, but in reality has been the transfer of the title deeds from one group of corrupt oligarchs to another.
The vast riches generated by Russia’s seemingly limitless oil and gas reserves have put the swagger back in the bear’s step. With Russia now boasting the world’s third largest currency reserves — some £200 billion — the Kremlin has been able to finance a massive increase in spending on the nation’s defence budget — from 140 billion roubles in 2001 to 870 billion (£16.7 billion) this year. And it is this resurgent militarism, together with the increasingly confrontational approach Mr Putin has recently adopted in his dealings with the West, which has raised fears about the prospect of a new Cold War enveloping the European continent.
In fact, looking at the world through the prism of the Kremlin’s inner sanctum, a very different sort of perspective emerges, one in which the Russians, for all their newfound wealth, remain utterly paranoid about what they regard as the West’s Machiavellian designs to subjugate them to the status of international serfdom.
‘Look,’ said one senior Kremlin official pointing at a huge map of the vast mass of Russia’s hinterland displayed upon his wall. ‘If the Americans put their radar systems in central Europe, as they plan to do, they will be able to monitor everything we do throughout half of our territory. What’s that got to do with protecting the West from attack by rogue states?’
I had raised the vexed issue of Washington’s missile defence system, key parts of which will be located on Russia’s border in Poland and the Czech Republic, because it appeared to me to lie at the heart of the recent escalation in tensions between the Kremlin and the West, but I had been unprepared for the almost hysterical response it generated from my Kremlin host.
More articles from: Con Coughlin | this section
Post this entry to: del.icio.us | Digg | Newsvine | NowPublic | Reddit
Advertisement
Nancy Dell’Olio makes an impassioned case for Keynesian economics as the necessary remedy for the global crisis. It is to the Cambridge economist that we should turn once more
Dylan Jones is astonished to find in Sofia that the former communist country has embraced his guide to the mores of modern life — and that not everybody looks like Borat
Matthew Castray looks back on the Australian Prime Minister’s first year in office and audits an administration which has reviewed much and done very little
Rod Liddle says that something has gone wrong when 15 South Lanarkshire social workers are sacked over a dodgy Gary Glitter joke while none of their counterparts in Haringey has even been reprimanded over the ‘Baby P’ case
Fraser Nelson says that the Pre-Budget Report killed off New Labour without landing a punch on the Tories. It has paved the way for a new Conservatism, in which Cameron woos aspirational voters, focuses on government debt and looks for responsible spending cuts
The French President’s strop is more eloquent than any policy or speech, says Celia Walden. He is a pint-sized de Gaulle regularly made to look a fool by his wife
Philip Bobbitt says that the crisis reflects Russia’s determination to remain an old-fashioned nation state, dominating its region. Intellectual imagination will be needed to thwart that ambition: a recognition that the post-Cold War world needs new global institutions
Owen Matthews says that the great literary prophet has been attacked on the internet by Russians who associate him with the collapse of the Soviet Union. The truth still hurts
From the President downwards, all Afghans know that the peace in Helmand is precarious.Fraser Nelson reports from a shattered land of corruption and murky power where warlords wait to see if the West has what it takes to stay the course and thwart a horrific new conflict
Melanie Phillips says that the prosperity and growing cultural confidence of Israel is a fitting riposte to the Western intelligentsia, American meddling and the daily propaganda assault that ignores the Islamisation of the Palestinians
Subscribe to Sky from £16 a month. Get free equipment and free broadband - Join Now. Sky HD - be amongst the first to have it - order now.
Subscribe to Sky from £16 a month. Get free equipment and free broadband - Join Now. Sky HD - be...
PORTA METRONIA, ROME Standing high on the top of one of the seven hills of Rome- the Coelian- this unique
ROME and PARIS: over 350 holiday rentals apartments listed: visit www.romanreference.com and www.parisreference.com or call +39 0648 903612.
Goldsmiths by Design Welcome to Ruffs! You have found a company of Goldsmiths that specialises in the manufacture, amongst other
Spectator Business | Apollo Magazine
Corporate | Advertising | Privacy | Terms
Spectator, 22 Old Queen Street, London, SW1H 9HP
All Articles and Content Copyright ©2008 by The Spectator | All Rights Reserved
Alex
November 19th, 2007 6:56amI think, that americans place this radar and missiles because they are not interested to see quet and friendly Europe. If EC and Russia help each other. Russia to Europe with energy and Europe to Russia with technologies and transport. Everybody will forget about USA, they will lose their influence. Look! They come to European outsiders and place their military facilities to protect Europe, but nobody in Europe was asking them or even was warried about danger from Iran. The main reason is to politicaly destabilize relations between EC and Russia, in this case USA have their role and keep control!