And now everyone is a hack, what hope for the professionals?
Now I understand why James Whittaker, the former royal correspondent of the Mirror, would snap ‘Am I talking in my own time?’ if taking a call from a production company/another journalist/researcher. The opportunities for providing content for nothing are apparently limitless, and at the same time the market has been saturated by a similar oversupply in content-providers. As Professor Roy Greenslade says, ‘In effect, every citizen is now a journalist. Journalistic skills are not entirely wiped out in an online world, but they are eroded and, most importantly, they cannot be confined any longer to an exclusive elite group.’ Aaagh! The joyful message of the cartoon movie Ratatouille is that anyone can cook, even a rat. And the sinister message of the age of Prof. Greenslade, the free newspapers and the blogosphere is that anyone can be a journalist, as well as all the rats who already are.
So this is where we are. Everyone is writing, everywhere, all the time. Which is bad news, no? If market economics suggest that four million bloggers are willing to file for free, and if commuters read pappy freesheets rather than hand out 50p for the crunchier fare of the Standard, then newspapers will be less keen to pay their staff or freelancers a living wage, and ‘free speech’ will come to be a euphemism for ‘unpaid writers’ in the New Media Age of Change.
In the hierarchy of things people don’t care about â” the Lib Dem leadership contest, the new Britney album, the Diana inquest â” the pay-rate per word of the freelance journalist wins hands down, I know. But still, the writers’ strike in Hollywood seems to signal that those who make words for a living are feeling hard done by.
There, the row is mainly over residuals â” the tiny crumbs in fees that writers are paid when their work is shown again in other formats and media. The TV networks and film studios won’t can their existing DVD deal, which pays the writer four cents on each $15 DVD. In fact, they want to extend this terrific deal on the same minimal terms to internet downloads and mobile phone viewing. The writers, meanwhile, want eight cents per DVD, which doesn’t seem an awful lot.
Now I know that Hollywood is different and journalists don’t make fortunes for their companies in the same way as, say, the writers of the Sopranos do, but publishers and distributors are under the same pressure here to push down the cost of the raw materials, which are words. According to the NUJ, ‘newspaper rates haven’t gone up for 20 years’. Indeed, if you want to put in a day’s work at the Guardian as a sub (£160 and sinking), I would steer you to the offices of the Turkish daily Hürriyet, where the day-rate is £200.
More articles from: Rachel Johnson | this section
Post this entry to: del.icio.us | Digg | Newsvine | NowPublic | Reddit
Advertisement
Nancy Dell’Olio makes an impassioned case for Keynesian economics as the necessary remedy for the global crisis. It is to the Cambridge economist that we should turn once more
Dylan Jones is astonished to find in Sofia that the former communist country has embraced his guide to the mores of modern life — and that not everybody looks like Borat
Matthew Castray looks back on the Australian Prime Minister’s first year in office and audits an administration which has reviewed much and done very little
Rod Liddle says that something has gone wrong when 15 South Lanarkshire social workers are sacked over a dodgy Gary Glitter joke while none of their counterparts in Haringey has even been reprimanded over the ‘Baby P’ case
Fraser Nelson says that the Pre-Budget Report killed off New Labour without landing a punch on the Tories. It has paved the way for a new Conservatism, in which Cameron woos aspirational voters, focuses on government debt and looks for responsible spending cuts
If there really is a secret Zionist brotherhood running the world, why aren’t I a member?
Just What I Always Wanted: Unwrapping the World’s Most Curious Presents, by Robin Laurance
Catherine Blyth says that conversation is an art: its essence is the acrobatic business of reading and changing minds — talking with people, not at them
I’m not saying these are bad people. Just that they are fat
Ross Clark on investment
Subscribe to Sky from £16 a month. Get free equipment and free broadband - Join Now. Sky HD - be amongst the first to have it - order now.
Subscribe to Sky from £16 a month. Get free equipment and free broadband - Join Now. Sky HD - be...
PORTA METRONIA, ROME Standing high on the top of one of the seven hills of Rome- the Coelian- this unique
ROME and PARIS: over 350 holiday rentals apartments listed: visit www.romanreference.com and www.parisreference.com or call +39 0648 903612.
Goldsmiths by Design Welcome to Ruffs! You have found a company of Goldsmiths that specialises in the manufacture, amongst other
Spectator Business | Apollo Magazine
Corporate | Advertising | Privacy | Terms
Spectator, 22 Old Queen Street, London, SW1H 9HP
All Articles and Content Copyright ©2008 by The Spectator | All Rights Reserved
pj
November 15th, 2007 2:14pmGood. Next question?
ian skidmore
November 15th, 2007 3:58pmMs Joynson proves the truth of her own headline
mburgess
November 16th, 2007 4:29pmThis piece would have had greater force had it been better written. The casual nepotism (what makes her think her daughter will be able to write?) is tawdry.
Max
November 18th, 2007 9:00pmThe only hope for the professionals is for them to prove that they can produce something worth paying for. There are many examples on the internet of amateurs being supported by subscriptions/payments because people genuinely want to read their work.
Gavin
November 23rd, 2007 2:30pmWe tell my granny she's a great cook, and I have to say, she's not half bad. But good enough to win a Michelin award? Or run a high street restaurant? Naw, takes a real pro to bring all the elements together. Even if they are not appreciated or properly paid.
Lucan C. Heraclitus
November 25th, 2007 2:27pmRachel Johnson belongs to the chit-chat school of columnizing (has anybody seen that word before - if not I claim it) and it is not for me to speak of its value, or her skill as an exponent. However, it would be helpful to know if any reader can identify even one observation or argument in this piece as being worthy of note?