Britain is being demolished
Wake up: Britain is being demolished under our very noses
Almost by stealth, our built landscape is being transformed
These principles created the sort of problems that a beautiful historic town like Gloucester faces today. They are deep, intractable and scarring. But luckily they are often also self-destructing. The concrete shopping centres of Gloucester, Huntingdon and Bath are falling apart, civic buildings are often poorly located, road schemes intrusive. Even if they had not failed us, many would have to be replaced anyway.
The story of Birmingham encapsulates this perfectly. The city centre had been very badly damaged in the Blitz and Herbert Manzoni, the father of Birmingham’s postwar redevelopment, had a clear vision of a great new modern city. The 23-acre Bullring shopping centre, begun in 1961 and costing the vast sum of £8 million, was based on the American mall and incorporated a bus station and a nine-storey office block. Soon the Victorian library was demolished and replaced with a new Brutalist one, an inverted pyramid with space for 1.5 million books. The new multilevel motorway network ringed the city including, on its outskirts, the remarkable and sculptural Spaghetti Junction, and in the centre the inaptly named Paradise Circus. New housing was created in medium- and high-rise to a high density, providing a new sort of home for Brummies.
By the 1970s Birmingham represented both the dream of the postwar planners and the Frankenstein they had created. But Birmingham’s story is ending happily. Over a period of ten years Manzoni’s vision has been carefully and comprehensively dismantled by a new generation of planners and, if the council’s plan to demolish the library goes ahead, within a short while no trace will be left of Britain’s first and most comprehensive Brutalist city. Birmingham, for anyone who has not been there recently, has been transformed; Brindley Place is one of the most successful and enjoyable new city centres in England, brilliantly harmonising old and new, small and large, modern and traditional materials. It spreads much further than that, scrubbing out the old Bullring and the arterial roads. All that is now needed is the demolition of Britain’s most depressing railway station â” New Street.
More articles from: Simon Thurley | this section
Post this entry to: del.icio.us | Digg | Newsvine | NowPublic | Reddit
Advertisement
Here’s how McCain can beat Obama to the White House
Reihan SalamThe acclaimed young Republican writer, Reihan Salam, says that McCain can win the presidency if he appeals relentlessly to the non-college-educated white middle class, pursues family-friendly tax reform and stands for global peace through American strength
Beijing Notebook
Boris JohnsonBoris Johnson recalls his recent jaunt to China on the occasion of the Olympic games
Our obsession with paedophilia is more dangerous than Gary Glitter’s return
Rod LiddleRod Liddle says that the hunt for this foul child molester is the symptom of an unhealthy and disproportionate fixation that has spawned all sorts of absurd rules and regulations
Confessions of a travelling non-dom
O`ar PaliO’ar Pali says it isn’t easy being on planes next to strangers all the time — and you quickly find there are a series of character types, dying to tell you about themselves
Reading on the web is not really reading
Susan JacobySusan Jacoby laments the intellectual crisis now gripping America and says that the torrent of digital infotainment is threatening basic literacy and news knowledge
Give us back our Big Idea, Mr Cameron
Liam ByrneLiam Byrne — tipped for Cabinet promotion in the reshuffle — says that when Cameroons advocate ‘fraternity’ they are repackaging the Conservative case for the shrinking of the state
Russia’s aggression in Georgia is a portent of perils to come
Philip BobbittPhilip Bobbitt says that the crisis reflects Russia’s determination to remain an old-fashioned nation state, dominating its region. Intellectual imagination will be needed to thwart that ambition: a recognition that the post-Cold War world needs new global institutions
Don’t mention the Afghan–Pakistan war
Fraser NelsonBoth Britain and America are reluctant to admit it but, says Fraser Nelson, our most pressing foreign policy problem is what to do about Pakistan, a nuclear-armed state in which terrorists have taken sanctuary
Our lazy firemen must make a radical change
Leo McKinstryBritain’s firefighters are under-worked and inflexible, says Leo McKinstry. It’s time we created a unified emergency service
I feel for Ingrid Betancourt — I was kidnapped, too
Tristan Garel-JonesTristan Garel-Jones on being kidnapped and why the world should stand with Colombia
Latest blog posts
sponsored links
Sky TV, Broadband & Talk from £16 a Month
Sky TV & free broadband packages available from £16 a month. Choose from a standard free sky box, sky plus or sky hd.
Sky TV, Broadband & Talk from £16 a Month
Sky TV & free broadband packages available from £16 a month. Choose from a standard free sky box, sky plus...
ROME CENTRE
PORTA METRONIA, ROME Standing high on the top of one of the seven hills of Rome- the Coelian- this unique
City Breaks. ROME and PARIS
ROME and PARIS: over 350 holiday rentals apartments listed: visit www.romanreference.com and www.parisreference.com or call +39 0648 903612.
Jewellery. RUFFS (Estd. 1904).
Goldsmiths by Design Welcome to Ruffs! You have found a company of Goldsmiths that specialises in the manufacture, amongst other
Spectator Business | Apollo Magazine
Corporate | Advertising | Privacy | Terms
Spectator, 22 Old Queen Street, London, SW1H 9HP
All Articles and Content Copyright ©2008 by The Spectator | All Rights Reserved
Nyal Williams
November 15th, 2007 3:59pmWhy would I subscribe when your teaser beginning of an article is covered up by an ad for an automobile such that I can't even read your teaser?
Nicholas Millman
November 15th, 2007 10:25pmSimon Thurley's interesting article focusses on urban "re-generation" but fails to mention the "urbanisation" of the rural countryside under this government's watch. Densely packed computer-plotted mini-estates squeeze themselves into even the smallest villages, pavements, kerbstones and railings appear, there are signs everywhere - mirroring the new town hall "Do this, do that" nannyism. New roads weave between blocks of houses with no front gardens, no space. Nowhere it appears have planners or designers got to grips with building in harmony with the rural environment; the beauty of our small towns and villages is being laid waste by blatent greed. And don't let anyone spin that yarn of the need for low-cost housing and more houses; this is not about that. This is about making the most money from development and re-development and disregarding the impact on the visual environment. The very worst kind of short-termism that proliferates in 21st Century corporate Britain.
Herbert Thornton
November 16th, 2007 4:06amI already mentioned that I echo what Nyal Williams wrote. The car advert. is irritating.
Now I ask - why do I get a blank page when I try to read Paul Johnson's piece?
One-eye
November 19th, 2007 9:30amWe ain't seen nothing yet, millions more affordable homes, population 70 million by 2035-50. I dunno, where is all the short term - long term energy to come from to power all of this expansion? I reckon it's all a no brainer. Water availability is probably the biggest potential disaster waiting to happen. Just one long hot summer is all that it will take.
Minnie Ovens
November 21st, 2007 10:27amHow very true. There are very few post war buildings which live up to their Victorian counterparts. For instance, Chelsea and Kensington is a borough with a split personality Left with some of the most beautiful architecture in Britain it spent decades replacing this with concrete boxes. Yet they also have, at times, left the Victorian facades and rebuilt the interiors. This allows for the best of both worlds.
Laura Fox
November 21st, 2007 3:02pmYou selfish elitist! We have millions of young people unable to afford decent housing! Young couples delaying getting married for not being able to buy, and some times not even rent, a house! A home! Young couples delaying having children, and having to pay exorbitant rents on miniscule flats! In the XXI century! And you, the middle and upper classes, keep talking about “urban sprawl”, “green belts”, or "concreting over the countryside"! Flimsy, pitiful excuse! Less than 2% of British soil is built up! Yes, less than 2%! And in the Southeast less than 4%! If you doubt it, do a proper academic research, but with SOLID data - Don’t just quote each other… Or, just fly over Britain and see for yourselves! You may even fly out of Heathrow or Gatwick, and you will be amazed. The feeling of crowdedness is just consequence of ridiculously low levels of investments, in all areas, but particularly transport, and a criminal planning system. Similar rubbish happened in the 1920s, with the Kensington elites leading a sneering campaign at the then new middle-classes building their family homes in the suburbs. What about the basic human right for SHELTER! Basic! A HOME for my family! I am not demanding any luxury here! You just want to keep your houses prices up! And don’t even have the courage and decency of admitting or even realising it! Talk about “cognitive dissonance”! Repugnant. In many decent countries, when development brings better living standards to the people, the elite is happy with it. I've personally seen it in USA, Italy, Sweden and Netherlands. But Britain? No... Shame on you all! Disgusting!
Natalie Law
November 22nd, 2007 10:49amLaura Fox - you are the selfish one here. What gives on earth gives you the "right" to a home for "you and your family"? No doubt you also want a garden and bedroom for each of the endless number of children you may want to have, and if you are not in work no doubt you will also expect the state to pay for it. Moreover, the debate is not about stopping development, but the type and method of development. Why do you think the vast failed council estates of the 1960s are now being pulled down? They were also built due to the mistaken propaganda from people like you who demanded new homes be built at all costs. What's wrong with renovating an old home? There are 1 million empty homes in Britain - why don't you get off your backside and renovate one yourself?
gerry
November 22nd, 2007 4:00pmExcellent article with no obscuring advert. Hey guys, you need Firefox's "adblock plus".
Nicholas Millman
November 24th, 2007 12:49amLaura, you sound like someone strident and right-on who missed out on buying a home because you spent too long camped outside Greenham Common. Natalie is spot on. This is not about stopping development but about the way it is being done. Perhaps you need to spend more time reading and understanding what people have actually written than shouting, placard waving and name-calling?
Peter York
November 24th, 2007 5:40pmSimon Hurley makes a good point and appears to be concentrating on the nature of rather than the extent of development. Why have we not been able to create a modern aesthetic which is appreciated?
The tawdry character of our general urban environment appears to be a lack of imagination and lack of care rather than lack of funding.
Roger Inkpen
November 25th, 2007 11:32amHousing I agree with Laura Fox. This is all down to nimbyism. Sometimes those who complain about excess development argue that they want better quality homes and towns. Of course we all want this, but if anyone ever hints that some field will be built on, the protests start. If you want better homes, how about coming up with serious proposals, unlike the luddites at CPRE who think we can make do with the odd 2-3 homes built at any one location. We need new towns. No, not dictated by the state, but preferably between the developers and the people who will live there. These need to be planned where are there are decent transport links already, so that you won’t get the situation we have in a new town built between Portsmouth and Southampton, which is already looking like a ghost town just 10 years after being built with its only access from a congested motorway link road. Besides, I don’t understand why all the fuss about the Gorgon’s housing plans. Just like so much else he and his predecessor announced: the integrated transport policy, NHS improvements, better education, environmental changes, it won’t happen as they aren’t capable.
Laura Fox
April 25th, 2008 4:35pmNatalie and Nicholas,
My husband and I both university graduated. He graduated in 1998 and helped me to graduate in 2003. Since then, in career-starting jobs, we started trying to save for a deposit, and tried to qualify for a mortgage. But as you probably foresaw, from the years of our graduations, the housing market boom has kept ahead of us.
No, we have NEVER used any state benefit, and don't want any either. If we could by a little plot, at normal land price, we could build our own house = home! But planning blocks us from it.